1,929,158 research outputs found

    Graph algebras and orbit equivalence

    Get PDF
    We introduce the notion of orbit equivalence of directed graphs, following Matsumoto’s notion of continuous orbit equivalence for topological Markov shifts. We show that two graphs in which every cycle has an exit are orbit equivalent if and only if there is a diagonal-preserving isomorphism between their C∗C∗-algebras. We show that it is necessary to assume that every cycle has an exit for the forward implication, but that the reverse implication holds for arbitrary graphs. As part of our analysis of arbitrary graphs EE we construct a groupoid G(C∗(E),D(E))G(C∗(E),D(E)) from the graph algebra C∗(E)C∗(E) and its diagonal subalgebra D(E)D(E) which generalises Renault’s Weyl groupoid construction applied to (C∗(E),D(E))(C∗(E),D(E)). We show that G(C∗(E),D(E))G(C∗(E),D(E)) recovers the graph groupoid GEGE without the assumption that every cycle in EE has an exit, which is required to apply Renault’s results to (C∗(E),D(E))(C∗(E),D(E)). We finish with applications of our results to out-splittings of graphs and to amplified graphs

    Singular 0/1-matrices, and the hyperplanes spanned by random 0/1-vectors

    Full text link
    Let P(d)P(d) be the probability that a random 0/1-matrix of size d×dd \times d is singular, and let E(d)E(d) be the expected number of 0/1-vectors in the linear subspace spanned by d-1 random independent 0/1-vectors. (So E(d)E(d) is the expected number of cube vertices on a random affine hyperplane spanned by vertices of the cube.) We prove that bounds on P(d)P(d) are equivalent to bounds on E(d)E(d): P(d)=(2−dE(d)+d22d+1)(1+o(1)). P(d) = (2^{-d} E(d) + \frac{d^2}{2^{d+1}}) (1 + o(1)). We also report about computational experiments pertaining to these numbers.Comment: 9 page

    Search for D0 to p e- and D0 to pbar e+

    Full text link
    Using data recorded by CLEO-c detector at CESR, we search for simultaneous baryon and lepton number violating decays of the D^0 meson, specifically, D^0 --> p-bar e^+, D^0-bar --> p-bar e^+, D^0 --> p e^- and D^0-bar --> p e^-. We set the following branching fraction upper limits: D^0 --> p-bar e^+ (D^0-bar --> p-bar e^+) p e^- (D^0-bar --> p e^-) < 1.2 * 10^{-5}, both at 90% confidence level.Comment: 10 pages, available through http://www.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS/, submitted to PRD. Comments: changed abstract, added reference for section 1, vertical axis in Fig.5 changed (starts from 1.5 rather than 2.0), fixed typo

    Lattice Points in Large Borel Sets and Successive Minima

    Full text link
    Let BB be a Borel set in Ed\mathbb E^{d} with volume V(B)=∞V(B)=\infty. It is shown that almost all lattices LL in Ed\mathbb E^{d} contain infinitely many pairwise disjoint dd-tuples, that is sets of dd linearly independent points in BB. A consequence of this result is the following: let SS be a star body in Ed\mathbb E^{d} with V(S)=∞V(S)=\infty. Then for almost all lattices LL in Ed\mathbb E^{d} the successive minima λ1(S,L),...,λd(S,L)\lambda_{1}(S,L),..., \lambda_{d}(S,L) of SS with respect to LL are 0. A corresponding result holds for most lattices in the Baire category sense. A tool for the latter result is the semi-continuity of the successive minima.Comment: 8 page
    • …
    corecore