Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationAbstraction plays an important role in digital design, analysis, and verification, as it allows for the refinement of functions through different levels of conceptualization. This dissertation introduces a new method to compute a symbolic, canonical, word-level abstraction of the function implemented by a combinational logic circuit. This abstraction provides a representation of the function as a polynomial Z = F(A) over the Galois field F2k , expressed over the k-bit input to the circuit, A. This representation is easily utilized for formal verification (equivalence checking) of combinational circuits. The approach to abstraction is based upon concepts from commutative algebra and algebraic geometry, notably the Grobner basis theory. It is shown that the polynomial F(A) can be derived by computing a Grobner basis of the polynomials corresponding to the circuit, using a specific elimination term order based on the circuits topology. However, computing Grobner bases using elimination term orders is infeasible for large circuits. To overcome these limitations, this work introduces an efficient symbolic computation to derive the word-level polynomial. The presented algorithms exploit i) the structure of the circuit, ii) the properties of Grobner bases, iii) characteristics of Galois fields F2k , and iv) modern algorithms from symbolic computation. A custom abstraction tool is designed to efficiently implement the abstraction procedure. While the concept is applicable to any arbitrary combinational logic circuit, it is particularly powerful in verification and equivalence checking of hierarchical, custom designed and structurally dissimilar Galois field arithmetic circuits. In most applications, the field size and the datapath size k in the circuits is very large, up to 1024 bits. The proposed abstraction procedure can exploit the hierarchy of the given Galois field arithmetic circuits. Our experiments show that, using this approach, our tool can abstract and verify Galois field arithmetic circuits up to 1024 bits in size. Contemporary techniques fail to verify these types of circuits beyond 163 bits and cannot abstract a canonical representation beyond 32 bits

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationFormal verification of hardware designs has become an essential component of the overall system design flow. The designs are generally modeled as finite state machines, on which property and equivalence checking problems are solved for verification. Reachability analysis forms the core of these techniques. However, increasing size and complexity of the circuits causes the state explosion problem. Abstraction is the key to tackling the scalability challenges. This dissertation presents new techniques for word-level abstraction with applications in sequential design verification. By bundling together k bit-level state-variables into one word-level constraint expression, the state-space is construed as solutions (variety) to a set of polynomial constraints (ideal), modeled over the finite (Galois) field of 2^k elements. Subsequently, techniques from algebraic geometry -- notably, Groebner basis theory and technology -- are researched to perform reachability analysis and verification of sequential circuits. This approach adds a "word-level dimension" to state-space abstraction and verification to make the process more efficient. While algebraic geometry provides powerful abstraction and reasoning capabilities, the algorithms exhibit high computational complexity. In the dissertation, we show that by analyzing the constraints, it is possible to obtain more insights about the polynomial ideals, which can be exploited to overcome the complexity. Using our algorithm design and implementations, we demonstrate how to perform reachability analysis of finite-state machines purely at the word level. Using this concept, we perform scalable verification of sequential arithmetic circuits. As contemporary approaches make use of resolution proofs and unsatisfiable cores for state-space abstraction, we introduce the algebraic geometry analog of unsatisfiable cores, and present algorithms to extract and refine unsatisfiable cores of polynomial ideals. Experiments are performed to demonstrate the efficacy of our approaches

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION OF ARITHMETIC CIRCUITS USING COMPUTER ALGEBRA APPROACH

Despite a considerable progress in verification of random and control logic, advances in formal verification of arithmetic designs have been lagging. This can be attributed mostly to the difficulty of efficient modeling of arithmetic circuits and data paths without resorting to computationally expensive Boolean methods, such as Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) that require ``bit blasting\u27\u27, i.e., flattening the design to a bit-level netlist. Similarly, approaches that rely on computer algebra and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) methods are either too abstract to handle the bit-level complexity of arithmetic designs or require solving computationally expensive decision or satisfiability problems. On the other hand, theorem provers, popular solvers used in industry, require a significant human interaction and intimate knowledge of the design to guide the proof process. The work proposed in this thesis aims at overcoming the limitations of verifying arithmetic circuits, especially at the post-synthesis, implementation phase. It addresses the verification problem at an algebraic level, treating an arithmetic circuit and its specification as an algebraic system. Specifically, verification approach employed in this work is based on the algebraic rewriting method. In this method, the circuit is modeled in the algebraic domain, where both the circuit specification and its gate-level implementation are represented as polynomials. This work formally analyzes the algebraic approach and compares it with the established computer algebra methods based on Grobner basis reduction. It shows that algebraic rewriting is more effective than the Grobner basis reduction from the computational point of view. This thesis addresses two classes of arithmetic circuits that could not directly benefit from this type of functional verification, since performing algebraic rewriting of such circuits encounters a serious memory issue. The circuits that fall in the first category are approximate arithmetic circuits, such as truncated integer multipliers. Different truncation schemes are considered, including bit deletion, bit truncation, and rounding. The proposed verification method is based on reconstructing the truncated multiplier to a complete, exact multiplier; it is then followed by algebraic rewriting to prove that it indeed implements multiplication over the required range of bits. The reconstruction of the multiplier helps avoid the memory overload issue as it creates a clean multiplier with a well defined specification polynomial. The other class of circuits that suffer from memory overload during algebraic rewriting are circuits subjected to some arithmetic constraints. An example of such circuits is a divider, where the divisor value cannot be zero. The other example can be found in the basic blocks of the constant divider, where the value of carry into each block must be less than the divisor value. In general, such constraints will be modeled using the concept of vanishing monomials. A case-splitting method is proposed along with the modified algebraic rewriting to resolve the memory issue. The proposed verification method not only can prove that the circuit performs a correct function under the desired (valid) conditions, but also will test all the undesired (invalid) cases. This work also addresses logic debugging of combinational arithmetic circuits over field F2k , including Galois field multipliers. Galois Field (GF) arithmetic has numerous applications in digital communication, cryptography and security engineering, and formal verification of such circuits is of prime importance. In addition to functional verification of GF multipliers, this work proposes a novel and effective method for identifying and correcting bugs in such circuits, commonly referred to as debugging. In this work we propose a novel approach to debugging of GF arithmetic circuits based on forward rewriting, which enables functional verification and debugging at the same time. This technique can handle multiple bugs, does not suffer from the polynomial size explosion encountered by other methods, and allows one to identify and automatically correct bugs in GF circuits. The techniques and algorithms proposed in this dissertation have been implemented in several computer programs, some stand-alone, and some integrated with a popular synthesis and verification tool, ABC. The experimental results for verification and debugging are compared with the state-of-the-art SAT, SMT, and other computer algebraic solvers

Software Model Checking with Uninterpreted Functions

Software model checkers attempt to algorithmically synthesize an inductive proof that a piece of software is safe. Such proofs are composed of complex logical assertions about program variables and control structures, and are computationally expensive to produce. Our unifying motivation is to increase the efficiency of verifying software control behavior despite its dependency on data. Control properties include important topics such as mutual exclusion, safe privilege elevation, and proper usage of networking and other APIs. These concerns motivate our techniques and evaluations. Our approach integrates an efficient abstraction procedure based on the logic of equality with uninterpreted functions (EUF) into the core of a modern model checker. Our checker, called euforia, targets control properties by treating a program's data operations and relations as uninterpreted functions and predicates, respectively. This reduces the cost of building inductive proofs, especially for verifying control relationships in the presence of complex but irrelevant data processing. We show that our method is sound and terminates. We provide a ground-up implementation and evaluate the abstraction on a variety of software verification benchmarks. We show how to extend this abstraction to memory-manipulating programs. By judicious abstraction of array operations to EUF, we show that we can directly reason about array reads and adaptively learn lemmas about array writes leading to significant performance improvements over existing approaches. We show that our abstraction of array operations completely eliminates much of the array theory reasoning otherwise required. We report on experiments with and without abstraction and compare our checker to the state of the art. Programs with procedures pose unique difficulties and opportunities. We show how to retrofit a model checker not supporting procedures so that it supports modular analysis of programs with non-recursive procedures. This technique applies to euforia as well as other logic-based algorithms. We show that this technique enables logical assertions about procedure bodies to be reused at different call sites. We report on experiments on software benchmarks compared to the alternative of inlining all procedures.PHDComputer Science & EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168092/1/dlbueno_1.pd

The 1992 4th NASA SERC Symposium on VLSI Design

Papers from the fourth annual NASA Symposium on VLSI Design, co-sponsored by the IEEE, are presented. Each year this symposium is organized by the NASA Space Engineering Research Center (SERC) at the University of Idaho and is held in conjunction with a quarterly meeting of the NASA Data System Technology Working Group (DSTWG). One task of the DSTWG is to develop new electronic technologies that will meet next generation electronic data system needs. The symposium provides insights into developments in VLSI and digital systems which can be used to increase data systems performance. The NASA SERC is proud to offer, at its fourth symposium on VLSI design, presentations by an outstanding set of individuals from national laboratories, the electronics industry, and universities. These speakers share insights into next generation advances that will serve as a basis for future VLSI design

Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2021

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

This open access two-volume set constitutes the proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS 2021, which was held during March 27 – April 1, 2021, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2021. The conference was planned to take place in Luxembourg and changed to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The total of 41 full papers presented in the proceedings was carefully reviewed and selected from 141 submissions. The volume also contains 7 tool papers; 6 Tool Demo papers, 9 SV-Comp Competition Papers. The papers are organized in topical sections as follows: Part I: Game Theory; SMT Verification; Probabilities; Timed Systems; Neural Networks; Analysis of Network Communication. Part II: Verification Techniques (not SMT); Case Studies; Proof Generation/Validation; Tool Papers; Tool Demo Papers; SV-Comp Tool Competition Papers

Programming Languages and Systems

This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 31st European Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2022, which was held during April 5-7, 2022, in Munich, Germany, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2022. The 21 regular papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 64 submissions. They deal with fundamental issues in the specification, design, analysis, and implementation of programming languages and systems