11 research outputs found
Incrementally Computing Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores of QBFs via a Clause Group Solver API
We consider the incremental computation of minimal unsatisfiable cores (MUCs)
of QBFs. To this end, we equipped our incremental QBF solver DepQBF with a
novel API to allow for incremental solving based on clause groups. A clause
group is a set of clauses which is incrementally added to or removed from a
previously solved QBF. Our implementation of the novel API is related to
incremental SAT solving based on selector variables and assumptions. However,
the API entirely hides selector variables and assumptions from the user, which
facilitates the integration of DepQBF in other tools. We present implementation
details and, for the first time, report on experiments related to the
computation of MUCs of QBFs using DepQBF's novel clause group API.Comment: (fixed typo), camera-ready version, 6-page tool paper, to appear in
proceedings of SAT 2015, LNCS, Springe
A Duality-Aware Calculus for Quantified Boolean Formulas
Wir präsentieren ein formales Rahmenwerk, das es ermöglicht das Verhalten von QBF-Beweisen zu beschreiben.Learning and backjumping are essential features in search-based decision procedures for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF). To obtain a better understanding of such procedures, we present a formal framework, which allows to simultaneously reason on prenex conjunctive and disjunctive normal form. It captures both satisfying and falsifying search states in a symmetric way. This symmetry simplifies the framework and offers potential for further variants.W1255-N23S11408-N23(VLID)193237
DepQBF 6.0: A Search-Based QBF Solver Beyond Traditional QCDCL
We present the latest major release version 6.0 of the quantified Boolean
formula (QBF) solver DepQBF, which is based on QCDCL. QCDCL is an extension of
the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) paradigm implemented in state of the
art propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers. The Q-resolution calculus
(QRES) is a QBF proof system which underlies QCDCL. QCDCL solvers can produce
QRES proofs of QBFs in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) as a byproduct of
the solving process. In contrast to traditional QCDCL based on QRES, DepQBF 6.0
implements a variant of QCDCL which is based on a generalization of QRES. This
generalization is due to a set of additional axioms and leaves the original
Q-resolution rules unchanged. The generalization of QRES enables QCDCL to
potentially produce exponentially shorter proofs than the traditional variant.
We present an overview of the features implemented in DepQBF and report on
experimental results which demonstrate the effectiveness of generalized QRES in
QCDCL.Comment: 12 pages + appendix; to appear in the proceedings of CADE-26, LNCS,
Springer, 201
Incremental QBF Solving
We consider the problem of incrementally solving a sequence of quantified
Boolean formulae (QBF). Incremental solving aims at using information learned
from one formula in the process of solving the next formulae in the sequence.
Based on a general overview of the problem and related challenges, we present
an approach to incremental QBF solving which is application-independent and
hence applicable to QBF encodings of arbitrary problems. We implemented this
approach in our incremental search-based QBF solver DepQBF and report on
implementation details. Experimental results illustrate the potential benefits
of incremental solving in QBF-based workflows.Comment: revision (camera-ready, to appear in the proceedings of CP 2014,
LNCS, Springer
Evaluating QBF Solvers: Quantifier Alternations Matter
We present an experimental study of the effects of quantifier alternations on
the evaluation of quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solvers. The number of
quantifier alternations in a QBF in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) is
directly related to the theoretical hardness of the respective QBF
satisfiability problem in the polynomial hierarchy. We show empirically that
the performance of solvers based on different solving paradigms substantially
varies depending on the numbers of alternations in PCNFs. In related
theoretical work, quantifier alternations have become the focus of
understanding the strengths and weaknesses of various QBF proof systems
implemented in solvers. Our results motivate the development of methods to
evaluate orthogonal solving paradigms by taking quantifier alternations into
account. This is necessary to showcase the broad range of existing QBF solving
paradigms for practical QBF applications. Moreover, we highlight the potential
of combining different approaches and QBF proof systems in solvers.Comment: preprint of a paper to be published at CP 2018, LNCS, Springer,
including appendi
Propagators and Solvers for the Algebra of Modular Systems
To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 21.
Solving complex problems can involve non-trivial combinations of distinct
knowledge bases and problem solvers. The Algebra of Modular Systems is a
knowledge representation framework that provides a method for formally
specifying such systems in purely semantic terms. Formally, an expression of
the algebra defines a class of structures. Many expressive formalism used in
practice solve the model expansion task, where a structure is given on the
input and an expansion of this structure in the defined class of structures is
searched (this practice overcomes the common undecidability problem for
expressive logics). In this paper, we construct a solver for the model
expansion task for a complex modular systems from an expression in the algebra
and black-box propagators or solvers for the primitive modules. To this end, we
define a general notion of propagators equipped with an explanation mechanism,
an extension of the alge- bra to propagators, and a lazy conflict-driven
learning algorithm. The result is a framework for seamlessly combining solving
technology from different domains to produce a solver for a combined system.Comment: To appear in the proceedings of LPAR 2
Clause/Term Resolution and Learning in the Evaluation of Quantified Boolean Formulas
Resolution is the rule of inference at the basis of most procedures for
automated reasoning. In these procedures, the input formula is first translated
into an equisatisfiable formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF) and then
represented as a set of clauses. Deduction starts by inferring new clauses by
resolution, and goes on until the empty clause is generated or satisfiability
of the set of clauses is proven, e.g., because no new clauses can be generated.
In this paper, we restrict our attention to the problem of evaluating
Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs). In this setting, the above outlined
deduction process is known to be sound and complete if given a formula in CNF
and if a form of resolution, called Q-resolution, is used. We introduce
Q-resolution on terms, to be used for formulas in disjunctive normal form. We
show that the computation performed by most of the available procedures for
QBFs --based on the Davis-Logemann-Loveland procedure (DLL) for propositional
satisfiability-- corresponds to a tree in which Q-resolution on terms and
clauses alternate. This poses the theoretical bases for the introduction of
learning, corresponding to recording Q-resolution formulas associated with the
nodes of the tree. We discuss the problems related to the introduction of
learning in DLL based procedures, and present solutions extending
state-of-the-art proposals coming from the literature on propositional
satisfiability. Finally, we show that our DLL based solver extended with
learning, performs significantly better on benchmarks used in the 2003 QBF
solvers comparative evaluation