Artificial intelligence in dentistry, orthodontics and orthognathic surgery: A literature review

Artificial intelligence is the ability of machines to work like humans. The concept initially began with the advent of mathematical models which gave calculated outputs based on inputs fed into the system. This was later modified with the introduction of various algorithms which can either give output based on overall data analysis or by selection of information within previous data. It is steadily becoming a favoured mode of treatment due to its efficiency and ability to manage complex conditions in all specialities. In dentistry, artificial intelligence has also popularised over the past few decades. They have been found useful for diagnosis in restorative dentistry, oral pathology and oral surgery. In orthodontics, they have been utilised for diagnosis, assessment of treatment needs, cephalometrics, treatment planning and orthognathic surgeries etc. The current literature review was planned to highlight the uses of artificial intelligence in dentistry, specifically in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery

Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Where Are We Now? A Scoping Review

Objective: This scoping review aims to determine the applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that are extensively employed in the field of Orthodontics, to evaluate its benefits, and to discuss its potential implications in this speciality. Recent decades have witnessed enormous changes in our profession. The arrival of new and more aesthetic options in orthodontic treatment, the transition to a fully digital workflow, the emergence of temporary anchorage devices and new imaging methods all provide both patients and professionals with a new focus in orthodontic care. Materials and methods: This review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The electronic literature search was performed through MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and IEEE Xplore databases with a 11-year time restriction: January 2010 till March 2021. No additional manual searches were performed. Results: The electronic literature search initially returned 311 records, and 115 after removing duplicate references. Finally, the application of the inclusion criteria resulted in 17 eligible publications in the qualitative synthesis review. Conclusion: The analysed studies demonstrated that Convolution Neural Networks can be used for the automatic detection of anatomical reference points on radiological images. In the growth and development research area, the Cervical Vertebral Maturation stage can be determined using an Artificial Neural Network model and obtain the same results as expert human observers. AI technology can also improve the diagnostic accuracy for orthodontic treatments, thereby helping the orthodontist work more accurately and efficiently

Development of intra-oral automated landmark recognition (ALR) for dental and occlusal outcome measurements

BACKGROUND: Previous studies embracing digital technology and automated methods of scoring dental arch relationships have shown that such technology is valid and accurate. To date, however there is no published literature on artificial intelligence and machine learning to completely automate the process of dental landmark recognition. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated system and software tool for the identification of landmarks on human teeth using geometric computing, image segmenting, and machine learning technology. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-nine digital models were used in the automated landmark recognition (ALR) validation phase, 161 of which were digital models from cleft palate subjects aged 5 years. These were manually annotated to facilitate qualitative validation. Additionally, landmarks were placed on 20 adult digital models manually by 3 independent observers. The same models were subjected to scoring using the ALR software and the differences (in mm) were calculated. All the teeth from the 239 models were evaluated for correct recognition by the ALR with a breakdown to find which stages of the process caused the errors. RESULTS: The results revealed that 1526 out of 1915 teeth (79.7%) were correctly identified, and the accuracy validation gave 95% confidence intervals for the geometric mean error of [0.285, 0.317] for the humans and [0.269, 0.325] for ALR—a negligible difference. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: It is anticipated that ALR software tool will have applications throughout clinical dentistry and anthropology, and in research will constitute an accurate and objective tool for handling large datasets without the need for time intensive employment of experts to place landmarks manually

Odontology & artificial intelligence

Neste trabalho avaliam-se os três fatores que fizeram da inteligência artificial uma tecnologia essencial hoje em dia, nomeadamente para a odontologia: o desempenho do computador, Big Data e avanços algorítmicos. Esta revisão da literatura avaliou todos os artigos publicados na PubMed até Abril de 2019 sobre inteligência artificial e odontologia. Ajudado com inteligência artificial, este artigo analisou 1511 artigos. Uma árvore de decisão (If/Then) foi executada para selecionar os artigos mais relevantes (217), e um algoritmo de cluster k-means para resumir e identificar oportunidades de inovação. O autor discute os artigos mais interessantes revistos e compara o que foi feito em inovação durante o International Dentistry Show, 2019 em Colónia. Concluiu, assim, de forma crítica que há uma lacuna entre tecnologia e aplicação clínica desta, sendo que a inteligência artificial fornecida pela indústria de hoje pode ser considerada um atraso para o clínico de amanhã, indicando-se um possível rumo para a aplicação clínica da inteligência artificial.There are three factors that have made artificial intelligence (AI) an essential technology today: the computer performance, Big Data and algorithmic advances. This study reviews the literature on AI and Odontology based on articles retrieved from PubMed. With the help of AI, this article analyses a large number of articles (a total of 1511). A decision tree (If/Then) was run to select the 217 most relevant articles-. Ak-means cluster algorithm was then used to summarize and identify innovation opportunities. The author discusses the most interesting articles on AI research and compares them to the innovation presented during the International Dentistry Show 2019 in Cologne. Three technologies available now are evaluated and three suggested options are been developed. The author concludes that AI provided by the industry today is a hold-up for the praticioner of tomorrow. The author gives his opinion on how to use AI for the profit of patients

Craniofacial Growth Series Volume 56

https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153991/1/56th volume CF growth series FINAL 02262020.pdfDescription of 56th volume CF growth series FINAL 02262020.pdf : Proceedings of the 46th Annual Moyers Symposium and 44th Moyers Presymposiu

Künstliche Intelligenz in der Zahnheilkunde: Scoping-Review und Schließung beobachteter Wissenslücken durch eine methodische und eine klinische Studie

Objectives: The aims of this dissertation were to (1) conduct a scoping review of stud-ies on machine learning (ML) in dentistry and appraise their robustness, (2) perform a benchmarking study to systematically compare various ML algorithms for a specific dental task, and (3) evaluate the influence of a ML-based caries detection software on diagnostic accuracy and decision-making in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: The scoping review included studies using ML in dentistry published between 1st January 2015 and 31st May 2021 on MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, and arXiv. The risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed with the QUADAS‐2 and TRIPOD checklists, respectively. In the benchmarking study, 216 ML models were built using permutations of six ML model architectures (U-Net, U-Net++, Feature Pyramid Networks, LinkNet, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network, and Mask Attention Network), 12 model backbones of varying complexities (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, VGG13, VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, DenseNet161, DenseNet169, and Dense-Net201), and three initialization strategies (random, ImageNet, and CheXpert weights). 1,625 dental bitewing radiographs were used for training and testing. Five-fold cross-validation was carried out and model performance assessed using F1-score. In the clin-ical trial, each one of 22 dentists examined 20 randomly selected bitewing images for proximal caries; 10 images were evaluated with ML and 10 images without ML. Accura-cy in lesion detection and the suggested treatment were evaluated. Results: The scoping review included 168 studies, describing different ML tasks, mod-els, input data, methods to generate reference tests, and performance metrics, imped-ing comparison across studies. The studies showed considerable risk of bias and mod-erate adherence to reporting standards. In the benchmarking study, more complex models only minimally outperformed their simpler counterparts, if at all. Models initial-ized by ImageNet or CheXpert weights outperformed those using random weights (p<0.05). The clinical trial demonstrated that dentists using ML showed increased accu-racy (area under the receiver operating characteristic [mean (95% confidence interval): 0.89 (0.87–0.90)]) compared with those not using ML [0.85 (0.83–0.86); p<0.05], pri-marily due to their higher sensitivity [0.81 (0.74–0.87) compared to 0.72 (0.64–0.79); p<0.05]. Notably, dentists using ML also showed a higher frequency of invasive treat-ment decisions than those not using it (p<0.05). Conclusion: To facilitate comparisons across ML studies in dentistry, a minimum (core) set of outcomes and metrics should be developed, and researchers should strive to improve robustness and reporting quality of their studies. ML model choice should be performed on an informed basis, and simpler models may often be similarly capable as more complex ones. ML can increase dentists’ diagnostic accuracy but also lead to more invasive treatment.Ziele: Die Ziele dieser Dissertation waren, (1) ein Scoping-Review von Studien über maschinelles Lernen (ML) in der Zahnmedizin, (2) eine Benchmarking-Studie zum systematischen Vergleich verschiedener ML-Algorithmen für eine bestimmte zahnmedizinische Aufgabe, und (3) eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie zur Bewertung einer ML-basierten Karies-Erkennungssoftware bezüglich diagnostischer Genauigkeit und Einfluss auf den Entscheidungsprozess durchzuführen. Methoden: Das Scoping-Review umfasste Studien über ML in der Zahnmedizin, veröffentlicht vom 1. Januar 2015 bis 31. Mai 2021 auf MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore und arXiv. Bias-Risiko und Berichtsqualität wurden mit den Checklisten QUADAS-2 beziehungsweise TRIPOD bewertet. In der Benchmarking-Studie wurden 216 ML-Modelle durch Permutationen von sechs Architekturen (U-Net, U-Net++, Feature Pyramid Networks, LinkNet, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network und Mask Attention Network), 12 Backbones (Res-Net18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, VGG13, VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, DenseNet161, DenseNet169 und DenseNet201) und drei Initialisierungsstrategien (zufällige-, ImageNet- und CheXpert-Gewichtungen) erstellt. Zum Training und Testen wurden 1.625 Bissflügel-Röntgenaufnahmen genutzt. Es wurde eine fünffache Kreuzvalidierung durchgeführt und die Modellleistung anhand des F1-Scores bewertet. In der klinischen Studie untersuchten 22 Zahnärzte jeweils 20 zufällig ausgewählte Bissflügelbilder auf Approximalkaries; 10 Bilder wurden mit und 10 Bilder ohne ML ausgewertet. Die Genauigkeit in der Erkennung von Läsionen sowie die abgeleitete Therapieempfehlung wurden bewertet. Ergebnisse: Das Scoping-Review schloss 168 Studien ein, in denen verschiedene ML-Aufgaben, Modelle, Eingabedaten, Methoden zur Generierung von Referenztests und Leistungsmetriken beschrieben wurden. Die Studien zeigten ein erhebliches Bias-Risiko und eine mäßige Einhaltung der Berichtsstandards. In der Benchmarking-Studie hatten komplexere Modelle gegenüber einfachen Modellen allenfalls geringe Vorteile. Mit ImageNet- oder CheXpert-Gewichtungen initialisierte Modelle übertrafen solche mit Zufallsgewichtungen (p<0,05). In der klinischen Studie erreichten Zahnärzte mit ML eine höhere Genauigkeit bei der Kariesdetektion (Receiver-Operating-Charakteristik [Mittelwert (95 % Konfidenzintervall) 0,89 (0,87–0,90)]) als ohne ML [0,85 (0,83–0,86); p<0,05], hauptsächlich aufgrund höherer Sensitivität [0,81 (0,74–0,87) verglichen mit 0,72 (0,64–0,79); p<0,05]. Zahnärzte mit ML wählten auffallend häufiger invasive Behandlungen als ohne ML (p<0,05). Schlussfolgerung: Zur besseren Vergleichbarkeit von ML-Studien in der Zahnmedizin, sollten Core Outcomes und Metriken definiert sowie Robustheit und Berichtsqualität verbessert werden. Die Entwicklung von ML-Modellen sollte auf informierter Basis erfolgen, bei oft ähnlicher Leistung von einfacheren und komplexeren Modellen. ML kann die diagnostische Genauigkeit erhöhen, aber auch zu mehr invasiven Behandlungen führen

The Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Dental Diagnostics: a State-of-the-Art Review

Optical coherence tomography provides sections of tissues in a noncontact and noninvasive manner. The device measures the time delay and intensity of the light scattered or reflected from biological tissues, which results in tomographic imaging of their internal structure. This is achieved by scanning tissues at a resolution ranging from 1 to 15 μm. OCT enables real-time in situ imaging of tissues without the need for biopsy, histological procedures, or the use of X-rays, so it can be used in many fields of medicine. Its properties are not only particularly used in ophthalmology, in the diagnosis of all layers of the retina, but also increasingly in cardiology, gastroenterology, pulmonology, oncology, and dermatology. The basic properties of OCT, that is, noninvasiveness and low wattage of the used light, have also been appreciated in analytical technology by conservators, who use it to identify the quality and age of paintings, ceramics, or glass. Recently, the OCT technique of visualization is being tested in different fields of dentistry, which is depicted in the article