Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts

Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory with a multitude of applications from computational interpretations to proof analysis. It is also the starting point for important meta-theoretical investigations into decidability, complexity, disjunction property, interpolation, and more. Unfortunately cut-elimination does not hold for the sequent calculi of most non-classical logics. It is well-known that the key to applications is the subformula property (a typical consequence of cut-elimination) rather than cut-elimination itself. With this in mind, we introduce cut-restriction, a procedure to restrict arbitrary cuts to analytic cuts (when elimination is not possible). The algorithm applies to all sequent calculi satisfying language-independent and simple-to-check conditions, and it is obtained by adapting age-old cut-elimination. Our work encompasses existing results in a uniform way, subsumes Gentzen’s cut-elimination, and establishes new analytic cut properties

Cut-restriction: from cuts to analytic cuts

Cut-elimination is the bedrock of proof theory with a multitude of applications from computational interpretations to proof analysis. It is also the starting point for important meta-theoretical investigations including decidability, complexity, disjunction property, and interpolation. Unfortunately cut-elimination does not hold for the sequent calculi of most non-classical logics. It is well-known that the key to applications is the subformula property (a typical consequence of cut-elimination) rather than cut-elimination itself. With this in mind we introduce cut-restriction, a procedure to restrict arbitrary cuts to analytic cuts (when elimination is not possible). The algorithm applies to all sequent calculi satisfying language-independent and simple-to-check conditions, and it is obtained by adapting age-old cut-elimination. Our work encompasses existing results in a uniform way, and establishes novel analytic subformula properties.Comment: 13 pages, conference preprin

Enhanced Realizability Interpretation for Program Extraction

This thesis presents Intuitionistic Fixed Point Logic (IFP), a schema for formal systems aimed to work with program extraction from proofs. IFP in its basic form allows proof construction based on natural deduction inference rules, extended by induction and coinduction. The corresponding system RIFP (IFP with realiz-ers) enables transforming logical proofs into programs utilizing the enhanced re-alizability interpretation. The theoretical research is put into practice in PRAWF1, a Haskell-based proof assistant for program extraction

Physics and Proof Theory

Axiomatization of Physics (and Science in general) has many drawbacks that are correctly criticized by opposing philosophical views of Science. This paper shows that, by giving formal proofs a more promi- nent role in the formalization, many of the drawbacks can be solved and many of the opposing views are naturally conciliated. Moreover, this ap- proach allows, by means of Proof Theory, to open new conceptual bridges between the disciplines of Physics and Computer Science

Материалы конференции: "Алгебра и математическая логика: теория и приложения"

Сборник содержит тезисы докладов, представленных на международную конференцию "Алгебра и математическая логика: теория и приложения" ( г. Казань 2-6 июня 2014 год) и сопутствующую молодежную летнюю школу "Вычислимость и вычислимые структуры", посвященную 210-летию Казанского университета, 80-летию со дня основания кафедры алгебры (ныне кафедры алгебры и математической логики) Казанского университета Н.Г. Чеботаревым и 70-летию со дня рождения зав. кафедрой члена-корреспондента АН РТ М.М. Арсланова.17