Neighborhood Failure Localization in All-Optical Networks via Monitoring Trails

Shared protection, such as failure dependent protection (FDP), is well recognized for its outstanding capacity efficiency in all-optical mesh networks, at the expense of lengthy restoration time due to multi-hop signaling mechanisms for failure localization, notification, and device configuration. This paper investigates a novel monitoring trail (m-trail) scenario, called Global Neighborhood Failure Localization (G-NFL), that aims to enable any shared protection scheme, including FDP, for achieving all-optical and ultra-fast failure restoration. We firstly define neighborhood of a node, which is a set of links whose failure states should be known to the node in restoration of the corresponding working lightpaths (W-LPs). By assuming every node can obtain the on-off status of traversing m-trails and W-LPs via lambda monitoring, the proposed G-NFL problem routes a set of m-trails such that each node can localize any failure in its neighborhood. Bound analysis is performed on the minimum bandwidth required for m-trails under the proposed G-NFL problem. Then a simple yet efficient heuristic approach is presented. Extensive simulation is conducted to verify the proposed G-NFL scenario under a number of different definitions of nodal neighborhood which concern the extent of dependency between the monitoring plane and data plane. The effect of reusing the spare capacity by FDP for supporting m-trails is examined. We conclude that the proposed G-NFL scenario enables a general shared protection scheme, toward signaling-free and ultra-fast failure restoration like p-Cycle, while achieving optimal capacity efficiency as FDP

Neighborhood Failure Localization in All-Optical Networks via Monitoring Trails

Shared protection, such as failure dependent protection (FDP), is well recognized for its outstanding capacity efficiency in all-optical mesh networks, at the expense of lengthy restoration time due to multi-hop signaling mechanisms for failure localization, notification, and device configuration. This paper investigates a novel monitoring trail (m-trail) scenario, called Global Neighborhood Failure Localization (G-NFL), that aims to enable any shared protection scheme, including FDP, for achieving all-optical and ultra-fast failure restoration. We firstly define neighborhood of a node, which is a set of links whose failure states should be known to the node in restoration of the corresponding working lightpaths (W-LPs). By assuming every node can obtain the on-off status of traversing m-trails and W-LPs via lambda monitoring, the proposed G-NFL problem routes a set of m-trails such that each node can localize any failure in its neighborhood. Bound analysis is performed on the minimum bandwidth required for m-trails under the proposed G-NFL problem. Then a simple yet efficient heuristic approach is presented. Extensive simulation is conducted to verify the proposed G-NFL scenario under a number of different definitions of nodal neighborhood which concern the extent of dependency between the monitoring plane and data plane. The effect of reusing the spare capacity by FDP for supporting m-trails is examined. We conclude that the proposed G-NFL scenario enables a general shared protection scheme, toward signaling-free and ultra-fast failure restoration like p-Cycle, while achieving optimal capacity efficiency as FDP

Monitoring trail: on fast link failure localization in all-optical WDM mesh networks

We consider an optical layer monitoring mechanism for fast link failure localization in all-optical wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) mesh networks. A novel framework of all-optical monitoring, called monitoring trail (m-trail), is introduced. It differs from the existing monitoring cycle (m-cycle) method by removing the cycle constraint. As a result, m-trail provides a general all-optical monitoring structure, which includes simple, nonsimple m-cycles, and open trails as special cases. Based on an in-depth theoretical analysis, we formulate an efficient integer linear program (ILP) for m-trail design to achieve unambiguous localization of each link failure. The objective is to minimize the monitoring cost (i.e., monitor cost plus bandwidth cost) of all m-trails in the solution. Numerical results show that the proposed m-trail scheme significantly outperforms its m-cycle-based counterpart.published_or_final_versio

Control and reliability of optical networks in multiprocessors

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1993.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 138-142).by James Jonathan Olsen.Ph.D

Regenerator placement and fault management in multi-wavelength optical networks.

Shen, Dong.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011.Includes bibliographical references (p. 98-106).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.i摘要 --- p.ivAcknowledgements --- p.vTable of Contents --- p.viChapter Chapter 1 --- Background --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Translucent Optical Networks --- p.1Chapter 1.1.1 --- The Way Towards Translucent --- p.1Chapter 1.1.2 --- Translucent Optical Network Architecture Design and Planning --- p.3Chapter 1.1.3 --- Other Research Topics in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.6Chapter 1.2 --- Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks --- p.12Chapter 1.2.1 --- Fault Monitoring in Network Layer's Perspective --- p.12Chapter 1.2.2 --- Passive Optical Monitoring --- p.14Chapter 1.2.3 --- Proactive Optical Monitoring --- p.16Chapter 1.3 --- Contributions --- p.17Chapter 1.3.1 --- Translucent Optical Network Planning with Heterogeneous Modulation Formats --- p.17Chapter 1.3.2 --- Multiplexing Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.19Chapter 1.3.3 --- An Efficient Regenerator Placement and Wavelength Assignment Scheme in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.20Chapter 1.3.4 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks Utilizing Real-Time Data Traffic --- p.20Chapter 1.4 --- Organization of Thesis --- p.22Chapter Chapter 2 --- Regenerator Placement and Resource Allocation Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.23Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.23Chapter 2.2 --- Translucent Optical Network Planning with Heterogeneous Modulation Formats --- p.25Chapter 2.2.1 --- Motivation and Problem Statements --- p.25Chapter 2.2.2 --- A Two-Step Planning Algorithm Using Two Modulation Formats to Realize Any-to-Any Topology Connectivity --- p.28Chapter 2.2.3 --- Illustrative Examples --- p.30Chapter 2.2.3 --- ILP Formulation of Minimizing Translucent Optical Network Cost with Two Modulation Formats under Static Traffic Demands --- p.34Chapter 2.2.4 --- Illustrative Numeric Examples --- p.42Chapter 2.3 --- Resource Allocation Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.45Chapter 2.3.1 --- Multiplexing Optimization with Auxiliary Graph --- p.45Chapter 2.3.2 --- Simulation Study of Proposed Algorithm --- p.51Chapter 2.3.3 --- An Efficient Regenerator Placement and Wavelength Assignment Solution --- p.55Chapter 2.3.4 --- Simulation Study of Proposed Algorithm --- p.60Chapter 2.4 --- Summary --- p.64Chapter Chapter 3 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks Utilizing Real-Time Data Traffic --- p.65Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.65Chapter 3.2 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring --- p.68Chapter 3.2.1 --- System Framework --- p.68Chapter 3.2.2 --- Phase 1: Passive Monitoring --- p.70Chapter 3.2.3 --- Phase 2: Proactive Probing --- p.71Chapter 3.2.4 --- Control Plane Design and Analysis --- p.80Chapter 3.2.5 --- Physical Layer Implementation and Suggestions --- p.83Chapter 3.3 --- Placement of Label Monitors --- p.83Chapter 3.3.1 --- ILP Formulation --- p.84Chapter 3.3.2 --- Simulation Studies --- p.86Chapter 3.3.3 --- Discussion of Topology Evolution Adaptiveness --- p.93Chapter 3.4 --- Summary --- p.95Chapter Chapter 4 --- Conclusions and Future Work --- p.95Chapter 4.1 --- Conclusions --- p.96Chapter 4.2 --- Future Work --- p.97Bibliography --- p.98Publications during M.Phil Study --- p.10

Small business innovation research. Abstracts of completed 1987 phase 1 projects

Non-proprietary summaries of Phase 1 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) projects supported by NASA in the 1987 program year are given. Work in the areas of aeronautical propulsion, aerodynamics, acoustics, aircraft systems, materials and structures, teleoperators and robotics, computer sciences, information systems, spacecraft systems, spacecraft power supplies, spacecraft propulsion, bioastronautics, satellite communication, and space processing are covered

Fault Localization in All-Optical Mesh Networks

Fault management is a challenging task in all-optical wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks. However, fast fault localization for shared risk link groups (SRLGs) with multiple links is essential for building a fully survival and functional transparent all-optical mesh network. Monitoring trail (m-trail) technology is an effective approach to achieve the goal, whereby a set of m-trails are derived for unambiguous fault localization (UFL). However, an m-trail traverses through a link by utilizing a dedicated wavelength channel (WL), causing a significant amount of resource consumption. In addition, existing m-trail methods incur long and variable alarm dissemination delay. We introduce a novel framework of real-time fault localization in all-optical WDM mesh networks, called the monitoring-burst (m-burst), which aims at initiating a balanced trade-off between consumed monitoring resources and fault localization latency. The m-burst framework has a single monitoring node (MN) and requires one WL in each unidirectional link if the link is traversed by any m-trail. The MN launches short duration optical bursts periodically along each m-trail to probe the links of the m-trail. Bursts along different m-trails are kept non-overlapping through each unidirectional link by scheduling burst launching times from the MN and multiplexing multiple bursts, if any, traversing the link. Thus, the MN can unambiguously localize the failed links by identifying the lost bursts without incurring any alarm dissemination delay. We have proposed several novel m-trail allocation, burst launching time scheduling, and node switch fabric configuration schemes. Numerical results show that the schemes, when deployed in the m-burst framework, are able to localize single-link and multi-link SRLG faults unambiguously, with reasonable fault localization latency, by using at most one WL in each unidirectional link. To reduce the fault localization latency further, we also introduce a novel methodology called nested m-trails. At first, mesh networks are decomposed into cycles and trails. Each cycle (trail) is realized as an independent virtual ring (linear) network using a separate pair of WLs (one WL in each direction) in each undirected link traversed by the cycle (trail). Then, sets of m-trails, i.e., nested m-trails, derived in each virtual network are deployed independently in the m-burst framework for ring (linear) networks. As a result, the fault localization latency is reduced significantly. Moreover, the application of nested m-trails in adaptive probing also reduces the number of sequential probes significantly. Therefore, practical deployment of adaptive probing is now possible. However, the WL consumption of the nested m-trail technique is not limited by one WL per unidirectional link. Thus, further investigation is needed to reduce the WL consumption of the technique.1 yea

System data communication structures for active-control transport aircraft, volume 2

The application of communication structures to advanced transport aircraft are addressed. First, a set of avionic functional requirements is established, and a baseline set of avionics equipment is defined that will meet the requirements. Three alternative configurations for this equipment are then identified that represent the evolution toward more dispersed systems. Candidate communication structures are proposed for each system configuration, and these are compared using trade off analyses; these analyses emphasize reliability but also address complexity. Multiplex buses are recognized as the likely near term choice with mesh networks being desirable for advanced, highly dispersed systems