909 research outputs found
The Muse approach to OR-parallel Prolog
Muse (Multi-sequential Prolog engines) is a simple and efficient approach to Or-parallel execution of Prolog programs. It is based on having several sequential Prolog engines, each with its local address space, and some shared memory space. It is currently implemented on a
7-processors machine with local/shared memory constructed at SICS, a 16-processors Sequent Symmetry, a 96-processors BBN Butterfly I, and a 45-processors BBN Butterfly II. The sequential SICStus Prolog system has been adapted to Or-parallel implementation. Extra overhead associated
with this adaptation is very low in comparison with the other approaches. The speed-up factor is very close to the number of processors in the system for a large class of problems. The goal of this paper is to present the Muse execution model, some of its implementation issues, a
variant of Prolog suitable for multiprocessor implementations, and some experimental results obtained from two different multiprocessor systems
ACE: And/or-parallel copying-based execution of logic programs
In this paper we present a novel execution model for parallel implementation of logic programs which is capable
of exploiting both independent and-parallelism and or-parallelism in an efficient way. This model extends
the stack copying approach, which has been successfully
applied in the Muse system to implement or-parallelism, by integrating it with proven techniques used to support independent and-parallelism. We show how all solutions to non-deterministic andparallel goals are found without repetitions. This is done through recomputation as in Prolog (and in various and-parallel systems, like &-Prolog and DDAS), i.e., solutions of and-parallel goals are not shared. We propose a scheme for the efficient management of the address space in a way that is compatible with the apparently incompatible requirements of both and- and
or-parallelism. We also show how the full Prolog language,
with all its extra-logical features, can be supported in our and-or parallel system so that its sequential semantics is preserved. The resulting system retains the advantages of both purely or-parallel systems as well as purely and-parallel systems. The stack copying scheme together with our proposed memory management scheme can also be used to implement models that combine dependent and-parallelism and or-parallelism, such as Andorra and Prometheus
Threads and Or-Parallelism Unified
One of the main advantages of Logic Programming (LP) is that it provides an
excellent framework for the parallel execution of programs. In this work we
investigate novel techniques to efficiently exploit parallelism from real-world
applications in low cost multi-core architectures. To achieve these goals, we
revive and redesign the YapOr system to exploit or-parallelism based on a
multi-threaded implementation. Our new approach takes full advantage of the
state-of-the-art fast and optimized YAP Prolog engine and shares the underlying
execution environment, scheduler and most of the data structures used to
support YapOr's model. Initial experiments with our new approach consistently
achieve almost linear speedups for most of the applications, proving itself as
a good alternative for exploiting implicit parallelism in the currently
available low cost multi-core architectures.Comment: 17 pages, 21 figures, International Conference on Logic Programming
(ICLP 2010
The CIAO Multi-Dialect Compiler and System: An Experimentation Workbench for Future (C)LP Systems
CIAO is an advanced programming environment supporting Logic and Constraint programming. It offers a simple concurrent kernel on top of which declarative and non-declarative extensions are added via librarles. Librarles are available for supporting the ISOProlog standard, several constraint domains, functional and higher order programming, concurrent and distributed programming, internet programming, and others. The source language allows declaring properties of predicates via assertions, including types and modes. Such properties are checked at compile-time or at run-time. The compiler and system architecture are designed to natively support modular global analysis, with the two objectives of proving properties in assertions and performing program optimizations, including transparently exploiting parallelism in programs. The purpose of this paper is to report on recent progress made in the context of the CIAO system, with special emphasis on the capabilities of the compiler, the techniques used for supporting such capabilities, and the results in the áreas of program analysis and transformation already obtained with the system
Towards high-level execution primitives for and-parallelism: preliminary results
Most implementations of parallel logic programming rely on complex low-level machinery which is arguably difflcult to implement and modify. We explore an alternative approach aimed at taming that complexity by raising core parts of the implementation to the source language level for the particular case of and-parallelism. Therefore, we handle a signiflcant portion of the parallel implementation mechanism at the Prolog level with the help of a comparatively small number of concurrency-related primitives which take care of lower-level tasks such as locking, thread management, stack set management, etc. The approach does not eliminate altogether modiflcations to the abstract machine, but it does greatly simplify them and it also facilitates experimenting with different alternatives. We show how this approach allows implementing both restricted and unrestricted (i.e., non fork-join) parallelism. Preliminary experiments show that the amount of performance sacriflced is reasonable, although granularity control is required in some cases. Also, we observe that the availability of unrestricted parallelism contributes to better observed speedups
Towards a High-Level Implementation of Execution Primitives for Unrestricted, Independent And-Parallelism
Most efficient implementations of parallel logic programming rely on complex low-level machinery which is arguably difficult to implement and modify. We explore an alternative approach aimed at taming that complexity by raising core parts of the implementation to the source language level for the particular case of and-parallellism. We handle a significant portion of the parallel implementation at the Prolog level with the help of a comparatively small number of concurrency.related primitives which take case of lower-level tasks such as locking, thread management, stack set management, etc. The approach does not eliminate altogether modifications to the abstract machine, but it does greatly simplify them and it also facilitates experimenting with different alternatives. We show how this approach allows implementing both restricted and unrestricted (i.e., non fork-join) parallelism. Preliminary esperiments show thay the performance safcrifieced is reasonable, although granularity of unrestricted parallelism contributes to better observed speedups
And-or parallel prolog: a recomputation based approach
We argüe that in order to exploit both Independent And- and Or-parallelism in Prolog programs there is advantage in recomputing some of the independent goals, as opposed to all their solutions being reused. We present an abstract model, called the Composition-Tree, for representing and-or parallelism in Prolog Programs. The Composition-tree closely mirrors sequential Prolog execution by recomputing some independent goals rather than fully re-using them. We also outline two environment representation techniques for And-Or parallel execution of full Prolog based on the
Composition-tree model abstraction. We argüe that these techniques have advantages over earlier proposals for exploiting and-or parallelism in Prolog
Recomputation based implementation of and-or parallel prolog
We argüe that in order to exploit both Independent And- and Or-parallelism in Prolog programs there is advantage in recomputing some of the independent goals, as opposed
to all their solutions being reused. We present an abstract model, called the Composition- Tree, for representing and-or parallelism in Prolog Programs. The Composition-tree
closely mirrors sequential Prolog execution by recomputing some independent goals rather than fully re-using them. We also outline two environment representation techniques for
And-Or parallel execution of full Prolog based on the Composition-tree model abstraction. We argüe that these techniques have advantages over earlier proposals for exploiting and-or parallelism in Prolog
- …