51 research outputs found

    The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error

    Get PDF
    A tomography of neural sources could be constructed from EEG/MEG recordings once the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem (NIP) is solved. Unfortunately the NIP lacks a unique solution and therefore additional constraints are needed to achieve uniqueness. Researchers are then confronted with the dilemma of choosing one solution on the basis of the advantages publicized by their authors. This study aims to help researchers to better guide their choices by clarifying what is hidden behind inverse solutions oversold by their apparently optimal properties to localize single sources. Here, we introduce an inverse solution (ANA) attaining perfect localization of single sources to illustrate how spurious sources emerge and destroy the reconstruction of simultaneously active sources. Although ANA is probably the simplest and robust alternative for data generated by a single dominant source plus noise, the main contribution of this manuscript is to show that zero localization error of single sources is a trivial and largely uninformative property unable to predict the performance of an inverse solution in presence of simultaneously active sources. We recommend as the most logical strategy for solving the NIP the incorporation of sound additional a priori information about neural generators that supplements the information contained in the data

    ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ๋ณต์› ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2013. 2. ์ •ํ˜„๊ต.๋‡Œ์ „๋„ ๋ฐ ๋‡Œ์ž๋„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ์˜์ƒ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ถ„ํฌ์ „๋ฅ˜์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ •๋ณด์™€ ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ ธ์•ผ๋งŒ ์œ ์ผํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์„ ๋ณต์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ญ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‡Œ์ „๋„ ๋ฐ ๋‡Œ์ž๋„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ์˜์ƒ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‡Œ์ž๋„๋Š” ๋Œ€๋‡Œํ”ผ์งˆ์ƒ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์ง€๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์— ๋‘”๊ฐํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋‡Œ์ „๋„๋Š” ๋‡Œ์ž๋„์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ถ„ํฌ์ „๋ฅ˜์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ์ถ”์ •์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‡Œ์ „๋„์™€ ๋‡Œ์ž๋„๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด ๋Œ€๋‡Œํ”ผ์งˆ ์ƒ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์„ ๋ณต์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‡Œ์ „๋„/๋‡Œ์ž๋„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ์˜์ƒ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณต์›๋œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํ•œ์ ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋„“์€ ์˜์—ญ์— ํผ์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„ํฌ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ณต์›๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ’์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณต์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹ ํ˜ธ์› ์˜์ƒ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ„์งˆํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ์ ์šฉํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ˆ ๋กœ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋œ ๋‡Œ๋ถ€์œ„์™€ ๋‡Œ์ž๋„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๋ณต์›๋œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์›์˜ ์œ„์น˜์™€ ๋ถ„ํฌ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‡Œ์ž๋„ ๋ฐ ๋‡Œ์ „๋„์˜ ๊ตญ์ง€ํ™” ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์•ž์œผ๋กœ ๋‡Œ์˜์—ญ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋ถ€์œ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ ๋ฐ ์—ญ๋ฌธ์ œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.The functional imaging of neuroelectromagnetic sources of electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) based on distributed source models requires additional information and constraints on the source in order to overcome the ill-posedness and to obtain a plausible solution. In this dissertation, we present two methods to enhance accuracy of MEG and EEG source reconstruction. We propose a new cortical source imaging algorithm for integrating simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG, which takes into account the different sensitivity characteristics of the two modalities with respect to cortical source orientations. It is well known that MEG cannot reliably detect neuronal sources with radial orientation, whereas EEG is relatively less dependent on the source orientations than MEG. However, this intrinsic difference has not previously been taken into account in the integrative cortical source imaging using simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data. On the other hands, most imaging algorithms explicitly favor either spatially more focal or diffuse current source patterns. Naturally, in a situation where both focal and extended sources are present or the source is arbitrary distributed, such reconstruction algorithms may yield inaccurate estimate. The other algorithm proposed in this dissertation improves accuracy of bio-electromagnetic source estimation regardless the extension of source distribution. The additional maximum amplitude constraint does successively enhance the localization accuracy in EEG/MEG source imaging. The proposed approaches are validated through numerical simulations and applied to practical epilepsy measurements and compared to the resection region. From the extensive analysis, it will be shown that the proposed approaches can enhance the source localization accuracy considerably, compared to the conventional approaches. Therefore the proposed methods in this dissertation are expected to be a promising approach on the research of inverse problem and many clinical applications of EEG and MEG.Abstracts 1 Contents 3 List of Tables 5 List of Figures 6 List of Symbols 8 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Motivation and Aim 9 1.2 Overview of Chapters 14 2. Basics of Functional Neuroimaging 16 2.1 Functional Neuroimaging 16 2.2 Measurment of EEG and MEG 19 2.2.1 EEG 19 2.2.2 MEG 22 2.3 Anatomy of Human Brain 24 2.4 Generation of Neuroelectromagnetic Fields 29 3. Forward and Inverse Problems 31 3.1 Neuroelectromagnetic Forward Problem 31 3.1.1 Quasi-Static Approximation 31 3.1.2 Analytic Formulation 32 3.1.3 Numerical Approach 35 3.1.4 Linearization of Forward Problem 38 3.2 Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem 39 3.2.1 Distributed Source Model 39 3.2.2 L2 Norm Mminimization Approach 40 3.2.3 L1 Norm Minimization Approach 42 4. Preprocessing and Quantitative Evalution Metrics 43 4.1 Preprosessing 43 4.2 Techniques of Quantification of Distributed Source 46 5. Algorithm Considering Directional Characteristics 56 5.1 Proposed Algorithm 56 5.2 Numerical Experiment of Proposed Method 63 6. Algorithm Considering the Maximum Current Density 70 6.1 Proposed Algorithm 70 6.2 Numerical Experiment of Proposed Method 72 6.3 Application to Localization of Epileptic Zone 84 7. Conclsion 89 References 92 Appendix A. Derivation of L2 Norm Minimization Problem 100 Appendix B. Derivation of Directional Inverse Operators 105 Appendix C. Derivation of L1 Norm Minimization Problem 107 Abstract (in Korean) 110Docto

    Multimodal Integration: fMRI, MRI, EEG, MEG

    Get PDF
    This chapter provides a comprehensive survey of the motivations, assumptions and pitfalls associated with combining signals such as fMRI with EEG or MEG. Our initial focus in the chapter concerns mathematical approaches for solving the localization problem in EEG and MEG. Next we document the most recent and promising ways in which these signals can be combined with fMRI. Specically, we look at correlative analysis, decomposition techniques, equivalent dipole tting, distributed sources modeling, beamforming, and Bayesian methods. Due to difculties in assessing ground truth of a combined signal in any realistic experiment difculty further confounded by lack of accurate biophysical models of BOLD signal we are cautious to be optimistic about multimodal integration. Nonetheless, as we highlight and explore the technical and methodological difculties of fusing heterogeneous signals, it seems likely that correct fusion of multimodal data will allow previously inaccessible spatiotemporal structures to be visualized and formalized and thus eventually become a useful tool in brain imaging research

    Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity

    Get PDF
    Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging is an ill-posed inverse problem that requires accurate conductivity modelling of the head tissues, especially the skull. Unfortunately, the conductivity values are difficult to determine in vivo. In this paper, we show that the exact knowledge of the skull conductivity is not always necessary when the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach is exploited. In BAE, we first postulate a probability

    Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis

    Get PDF
    In this primer, we give a review of the inverse problem for EEG source localization. This is intended for the researchers new in the field to get insight in the state-of-the-art techniques used to find approximate solutions of the brain sources giving rise to a scalp potential recording. Furthermore, a review of the performance results of the different techniques is provided to compare these different inverse solutions. The authors also include the results of a Monte-Carlo analysis which they performed to compare four non parametric algorithms and hence contribute to what is presently recorded in the literature. An extensive list of references to the work of other researchers is also provided
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore