4 research outputs found

    J Am Dent Assoc

    Get PDF
    Background:The objective of this systematic review was to describe the evidence for preventive and rehabilitative interventions for musculoskeletal disorders in dental professionals.Types of Studies Reviewed:Systematic search, screening, and eligibility processes were conducted to identify experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and survey research studies that either directly evaluated or predicted the effects of preventive or rehabilitative interventions on the reduction of musculoskeletal symptoms in dental professionals.Results:A total of 3,571 unique abstracts were identified and screened, 256 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 34 articles were included in the review. Seventeen experimental studies described the results of preventive or rehabilitation interventions and seventeen survey research studies predicted or correlated preventive/protective techniques to a reduction in musculoskeletal symptoms. The primary techniques evaluated in the studies included equipment modification, ergonomic training, and physical exercise.Practical Implications:Current evidence suggests that magnification loupes and indirect-vision techniques have a positive effect on the reduction of musculoskeletal symptoms. Other techniques have mixed evidence or are limited by low level study design in evaluating intervention efficacy.R01 OH010665/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS/United StatesR01OH010665/ACL/ACL HHS/United States2020-06-01T00:00:00Z31030935PMC67095897736vault:3552

    āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļšāļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĻāļĩāļĢāļĐāļ° āđāļĨāļ°āļ•āđ‰āļ™āđāļ‚āļ™āļ‚āļ“āļ°āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄ

    Get PDF
    āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļēāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļˆāđ‡āļšāļ›āļ§āļ”āļšāļĢāļīāđ€āļ§āļ“āļ„āļ­ āļšāđˆāļē āđ„āļŦāļĨāđˆ āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļŠāļĄāļ”āļļāļĨāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ™āļēāļ™āđ† āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļĄāđ‰āļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļĄāļēāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđāļ•āđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ­āļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļˆāđ‡āļšāļ›āļ§āļ” āļ›āļąāļˆāļˆāļļāļšāļąāļ™āļˆāļķāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ™āļģāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļēāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļŠāļĄāļ”āļļāļĨāļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒ āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄ (Intelligent Ergonomic Trainer: IET) āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāļ‚āļ“āļ°āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļšāļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļ§āļĩāļ”āļĩāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢ āļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒ āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™ 32 āļ„āļ™ āđāļšāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 2 āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāđ† āļĨāļ° 16 āļ„āļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāđāļšāļšāļŠāļļāđˆāļĄ āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļš āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļ§āļĩāļ”āļĩāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļ“āļ°āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļ­āļļāļ”āļŸāļąāļ™āļāļĢāļēāļĄāļšāļ™āļ‚āļ§āļēāļ‹āļĩāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŦāļļāđˆāļ™āļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡ āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļĨāļ° 5 āļ‹āļĩāđˆ āđƒāļ™āļ§āļąāļ™āđāļĢāļāļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļąāļ”āļĄāļļāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĻāļĩāļĢāļĐāļ°āđāļĨāļ°āļ•āđ‰āļ™āđāļ‚āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡ 2 āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāđƒāļ™āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāđƒāļ™āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 2 āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 3 āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļš āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄ āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 4 āļŠāļĨāļąāļšāļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄ āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 5 āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļš āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄ āļ™āļģāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡ 2 āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄ āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļšāļāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļēāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāļļāļ”āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļī pair t-testāļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļ§āļĩāļ”āļĩāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļēāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļŦāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ™āļąāļĒāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļī āđāļ•āđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĨāļąāļšāļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļ•āļēāļĄāļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļš āļŠāļĢāļļāļ› āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļ§āļĩāļ”āļĩāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđƒāļ™āļ™āļīāļŠāļīāļ•āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒÂ āļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļķāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļąāļ™āļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄ  āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļīāļ”āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡Â  āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĄāļ§āļĩāļ”āļĩāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļ‹āđ‰āļģ  āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļīāļ”āļ›āļāļ•āļīāļ—āļēāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļĢāđˆāļēāļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļāļĨāđ‰āļēāļĄāđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­Working posture of dental students can cause work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in neck, shoulder and back areas. This was resulting from the repetitive improper posture. Although the dental ergonomics was applied to improve the posture, the pain still occurred. Therefore, in the present trend, the material design technology has been applied to the devices for improving the ergonomic posture.Objective: The aim of this study was to develop the ergonomic devices to improve posture for dental students namely, Intelligent Ergonomic Trainer (IET) and compared with watching the video playback. IET had a capability to determine the proper position in dental practice and help correcting the work position by recording and warning when the dental students were not working in the appropriate posture by comparison with viewing of video after work.Materials and Methods: The real time feedback IET program and video playback with no feedback IET program were applied to 32 dental students who randomly divided into 2 groups. Each group did 5 sessions of filling 5 upper right first molar typodont teeth per session. Both groups were applied both programs different sequence. The baseline data of angles of head and upper arm were collected on the first day from both groups for using IET program with each group were separated to complete their task (the real time feedback IET task and video playback with no feedback IET task). Then the second practice in different ways in each group in the second session. In the third time, both groups were tested and recorded only the movement assessment I data. In the fourth time, the participant in two groups were switched their task (the real time feedback IET task and video playback with no feedback IET task). Finally, the fifth time, both groups were tested and recorded the assessment II data. The data from the first, third, and fifth times were statistically analyzed using the pair t-test.Results: The results showed that both IET programs with feedback and video playback was significantly improving the posture in dental students. However, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups when alternating the training programs.Conclusion: Both IET programs with feedback and video playback can develop the proper posture for dental students.Keywords: Intelligent Ergonomic Trainer, Real Time Feedback, Video Playback, Musculoskeletal Disorder

    Teste ergonÃīmico de protÃģtipo de uma camÃĒra de contençÃĢo de aerossol utilizada em odontologia

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate under the perception of dentistry students the work ergonomics using an aerosol containment chamber prototype and to determine possible necessary changes for its use. An aerosol containment chamber prototype was built of PVC pipes and transparent acrylic sheets. The aerosol containment chamber prototype was tested for its ergonomics in clinical practice, the dental care was simulated on a dental mannequin. In the simulation, 20 participants, who are students from the eighth to the tenth semester of the Dentistry Course at the Faculty of Dentistry of Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, carried out the construction of a Class I cavity in a lower molar and an upper molar and soon after answered a questionnaire that addressed information about the work ergonomics related to accomplish the service using the prototype. The research was done at the clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The results of this research were that the use of the dental chamber prototype encountered difficulties when preparing upper teeth and when changing instruments during the procedure. It proved to be efficient when working on teeth in the lower dental arch and on the position of the spine. It can be concluded that the prototype presented limitations when working on the upper dental arch and regarding the exchange of instruments, but it presented good ergonomics when working on lower teeth and a good position of the spine. Therefore, changes are needed for its use in the dental clinic.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, sob a percepçÃĢo de estudantes de Odontologia, a ergonomia de trabalho utilizando um protÃģtipo de uma cÃĒmara de contençÃĢo de aerossol e determinar possíveis mudanças para sua utilizaçÃĢo, caso necessÃĄrio. Foi criado um protÃģtipo de uma cÃĒmara de contençÃĢo de aerossol a partir de tubos de conexÃĩes de PVC e placas de acrílico transparente. O protÃģtipo de uma cÃĒmara de contençÃĢo de aerossol foi testado quanto a sua ergonomia na prÃĄtica clínica simulando um atendimento odontolÃģgico em um manequim de dentística com dentes artificiais. Na simulaçÃĢo, 20 participantes, sendo eles alunos do oitavo ao dÃĐcimo período do Curso de Odontologia da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, realizaram a confecçÃĢo de cavidade Classe I em um molar inferior e em um molar superior e logo em seguida responderam um questionÃĄrio que abordava informaçÃĩes sobre a ergonomia de trabalho relacionado ao atendimento utilizando o protÃģtipo. A pesquisa foi realizada na clínica da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Os resultados dessa pesquisa apontaram que o uso do protÃģtipo da cÃĒmara de contençÃĢo de aerossol apresenta dificuldades no momento de realizar preparos em dentes superiores e quanto à troca de instrumentos durante o procedimento. O protÃģtipo mostrou-se eficiente ao trabalhar em dentes da arcada dentÃĄria inferior e quanto à posiçÃĢo da coluna. Pode-se concluir que o protÃģtipo apresenta limitaçÃĩes durante o trabalho na arcada dentÃĄria superior e quanto a troca de instrumentos, porem apresentou boa ergonomia quando o trabalho foi executado em dentes inferiores e tambÃĐm possibilitou uma boa posiçÃĢo da coluna. Sendo assim, sÃĢo necessÃĄrias mudanças para sua utilizaçÃĢo na clínica odontolÃģgica

    Efeito do treino postural por biofeedback no estudante de medicina dentÃĄria : estudo piloto

    Get PDF
    IntroduçÃĢo: Com o intuito de prevenir e minimizar o impacto de lesÃĩes mÚsculoesquelÃĐticas ÃĐ de extrema relevÃĒncia a formaçÃĢo em ergonomia dos estudantes de medicina dentÃĄria. Dispositivos eletrÃģnicos portÃĄteis podem ser utilizados para treinar um indivíduo a melhorar a perceçÃĢo da sua postura e modificÃĄ-la atravÃĐs de um sistema de biofeedback. O objetivo principal deste estudo ÃĐ analisar o efeito que um dispositivo de biofeedback para treino postural tem na postura do estudante de medicina dentÃĄria. Como objetivo secundÃĄrio pretendese avaliar a aplicabilidade do dispositivo postural no ensino de princípios de ergonomia em medicina dentÃĄria. Materiais e MÃĐtodos: Este ÃĐ um estudo piloto que consiste na utilizaçÃĢo de um sensor de treino postural por biofeedback UpRight GO 2TM (Upright Technology Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel). Foram recolhidos dados diÃĄrios da percentagem de tempo em que os 5 participantes obtiveram uma postura correta durante sua utilizaçÃĢo, com recurso à aplicaçÃĢo do dispositivo de biofeedback. Foram tambÃĐm analisados os dados durante procedimentos clínicos dentÃĄrios simulados num fantoma antes e depois de 4 semanas de treino postural. Avaliou-se atravÃĐs do QuestionÃĄrio NÃģrdico a presença de sinais e sintomas mÚsculo-esquelÃĐticos. TambÃĐm se analisou a perceçÃĢo dos participantes sobre a utilizaçÃĢo do dispositivo biofeedback atravÃĐs de um questionÃĄrio. Resultados: A postura dos estudantes de medicina dentÃĄria melhorou apÃģs a utilizaçÃĢo do dispositivo de biofeedback UpRight GO 2TM, e de acordo com a opiniÃĢo dos participantes alÃĐm de recomendaram a sua utilizaçÃĢo, consideram que o sensor acarreta vantagens na adoçÃĢo de uma melhor postura durante o exercício da profissÃĢo e tambÃĐm de uma forma geral. ConclusÃĢo: Constatou-se que a utilizaçÃĢo de sistemas de biofeedback, estÃĄ associada a uma melhoria da postura dos estudantes de medicina dentÃĄria. O treino postural com este dispositivo parece ser exequível no contexto mÃĐdicodentÃĄrio.Introduction: In order to prevent and minimize the impact of musculoskeletal injuries, ergonomic training of dental students is of extreme importance. Wearable electronic devices can be used to train an individual to improve the perception of his posture and modify it through a biofeedback system. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the effect a biofeedback device for postural training has on dental students' posture. As a secondary aim it is intended to evaluate the applicability of the postural device in teaching ergonomic principles in dentistry. Materials and Methods: This is a pilot study that consists of using a biofeedback postural training sensor UpRight GO 2TM (Upright Technology Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel). Daily data were collected regarding the percentage of time the 5 participants achieved correct posture during its use, using the biofeedback device. Data were also analyzed during simulated clinical dental procedures on a phantom before and after 4 weeks of postural training. The Nordic Questionnaire was used to assess the presence of musculoskeletal signs and symptoms. The participants' perception of the use of the biofeedback device was also analyzed through a questionnaire. Results: The dental students' posture improved after using the UpRight GO 2TM biofeedback device, and according to the participants' opinion besides recommending its use, they consider that the sensor carries advantages in adopting a better posture during the exercise of the profession and also in general. Conclusion: It was found that the use of biofeedback systems is associated with an improvement in the posture of dental students. Postural training with this device seems to be feasible in the medical-dental context
    corecore