An adaptive solver for viscoelastic incompressible two-phase problems applied to the study of the splashing of slightly viscoelastic droplets

We propose an adaptive numerical solver for the study of viscoelastic 2D two-phase flows using the volume-of-fluid method. The scheme uses the robust log conformation tensor technique of Fattal & Kupferman (2004,2005} combined with the time-split scheme proposed by Hao & Pan (2007}. The use of this time-split scheme has been proven to increase the stability of the numerical computation of two-phase flows. We show that the adaptive computational technique can be used to simulate viscoelastic flows efficiently. The solver is coded using the open-source libraries provided by the \basilisk \cite{Basilisk} platform. In particular, the method is implemented for Oldroyd-B type viscoelastic fluids and related models (FENE-P and FENE-CR). The numerical scheme is then used to study the splashing of weakly viscoelastic drops. The solvers and tests of this work are freely available on the Basilisk web sit

An investigation into the energy and control implications of adaptive comfort in a modern office building

PhD ThesisAn investigation into the potentials of adaptive comfort in an office building is carried out using fine grained primary data and computer modelling. A comprehensive literature review and background study into energy and comfort aspects of building management provides the backdrop against which a target building is subjected to energy and comfort audit, virtual simulation and impact assessment of adaptive comfort standard (BS EN 15251: 2007). Building fabric design is also brought into focus by examining 2006 and 2010 Approved Document part L potentials against Passive House design. This is to reflect the general direction of regulatory development which tends toward zero carbon design by the end of this decade. In finishing a study of modern controls in buildings is carried out to assess the strongest contenders that next generation heating, ventilation and air-conditioning technologies will come to rely on in future buildings. An actual target building constitutes the vehicle for the work described above. A virtual model of this building was calibrated against an extensive set of actual data using version control method. The results were improved to surpass ASHRAE Guide 14. A set of different scenarios were constructed to account for improved fabric design as well as historical weather files and future weather predictions. These scenarios enabled a comparative study to investigate the effect of BS EN 15251:2007 when compared to conventional space controls. The main finding is that modern commercial buildings built to the latest UK statutory regulations can achieve considerable carbon savings through adaptive comfort standard. However these savings are only modestly improved if fabric design is enhanced to passive house levels. Adaptive comfort can also be readily deployed using current web-enabled control applications. However an actual field study is necessary to provide invaluable insight into occupants’ acceptance of this standard since winter-time space temperature results derived from BS EN 15251:2007 constitute a notable departure from CIBSE environmental guidelines

WEB APPLICATION METHOD "3D EMOTION COMPOSITION IN SUPERVISION" APPROBATION

The global pandemic has accelerated the development of the digital environment, face-to-face work is transferred online, so it is important to create tools adapted to the digital environment. The emergency of Covid-19 has raised the demand for online supervision. In supervision sessions, it is important to talk about experiencing emotions in a professional environment. Latvia lacks digital methods for working with emotions in supervision. The aim of the study was to adapt the 3DEC method, to create it as a web application for use in remote supervision and to approbate the web application "3D emotion composition in supervision" in individual online supervisions. The original method 3DEC is intended for the evaluation of emotional experience in the practice of art therapists (Lejstrauta, 2021; Vanadziņa, 2021). The theoretical basis of the 3DEC method is integrative and includes the following principles: visual representation of emotions in a visible symbolic form; play and play space (Winnicot, 2007); distancing as one of the cognitive emotion regulation strategies (Powers LaBar, 2019). 3DEC is also based on the Adaptive Coping with Emotions Model (ACE Model) (Berking Whitley, 2014). The adapted method “3D composition of emotions in supervision” (3DECS) is intended for work in online supervision with the aim to promote awareness of emotions, their understanding and self–reflection. Using distancing and view of other perspectives, the method helps the client to reflect and become aware of emotional experiences, as well as provides an educational function about the meaning of emotions. The 3DECS method develops emotional awareness and adaptive emotion regulation skills. Main results: 1) the web application has been tested and is designed to work with emotions in supervision; 2) the data of the approbation stage show that the web application is sufficiently simple and intuitive; 3) the web application is secure because no information about the customer and the customer's actions in the tool is stored; 4) there are no restrictions on the use of the web application in relation to the duration of the cooperation between the supervisor and the supervision client.

Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks

Nowadays, many websites allow social networking between their users in an explicit or implicit way. In this work, we show how argumentation schemes theory can provide a valuable help to formalize and structure on-line discussions and user opinions in decision support and business oriented websites that held social networks between their users. Two real case studies are studied and analysed. Then, guidelines to enhance social decision support and recommendations with argumentation are provided.This work summarises results of the authors joint research, funded by an STMS of the Agreement Technologies COST Action 0801, by the Spanish government grants [CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, and TIN2012-36586-C03-01] and by the GVA project [PROMETEO 2008/051].Heras Barberá, SM.; Atkinson, KM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Grasso, F.; Julian Inglada, VJ.; Mcburney, PJ. (2013). Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks. Artificial Intelligence Review. 39(1):39-62. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9389-0S3962391Amgoud L (2009) Argumentation for decision making. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, BerlinAnderson P (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Iechnology and Standards Watch reportBentahar J, Meyer CJJ, Moulin B (2007) Securing agent-oriented systems: an argumentation and reputation-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information technology: new generations (ITNG 2007), IEEE Computer Society, pp 507–515Buckingham Shum S (2008) Cohere: towards Web 2.0 argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational models of argument, COMMA, pp 28–30Burke R (2002) Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Model User-Adapt Interact 12:331–370Cartwright D, Atkinson K (2008) Political engagement through tools for argumentation. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 2008), pp 116–127Chesñevar C, McGinnis J, Modgil S, Rahwan I, Reed C, Simari G, South M, Vreeswijk G, Willmott S (2006) Towards an argument interchange format. Knowl Eng Rev 21(4):293–316Chesñevar CI, Maguitman AG, Gonzàlez MP (2009) Empowering recommendation technologies through argumentation. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 403–422García AJ, Dix J, Simari GR (2009) Argument-based logic programming. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, BerlinGolbeck J (2006) Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on trust management, LNCS, vol 3986, 93–104Gordon T, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10–15):875–896Guha R, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A (2004) Propagating trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on, World Wide Web, pp 403–412Heras S, Navarro M, Botti V, Julián V (2009) Applying dialogue games to manage recommendation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent aystems, ArgMASHeras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2010a) How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on computational models of argument, COMMA, vol 216, pp 267–274Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2010b) Applying argumentation to enhance dialogues in social networks. In: ECAI 2010 workshop on computational models of natural argument, CMNA, pp 10–17Karacapilidis N, Tzagarakis M (2007) Web-based collaboration and decision making support: a multi-disciplinary approach. Web-Based Learn Teach Technol 2(4):12–23Kim D, Benbasat I (2003) Trust-related arguments in internet stores: a framework for evaluation. J Electron Commer Res 4(2):49–64Kim D, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in internet stores: application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Inf Syst Rese 17(3):286–300Laera L, Tamma V, Euzenat J, Bench-Capon T, Payne T (2006) Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. In: Proceedings of the 5th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2006)Lange C, Bojãrs U, Groza T, Breslin J, Handschuh S (2008) Expressing argumentative discussions in social media sites. In: Social data on the web (SDoW2008) workshop at the 7th international semantic web conferenceLinden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 7(1):76–80Linden G, Hong J, Stonebraker M, Guzdial M (2009) Recommendation algorithms, online privacy and more. Commun ACM, 52(5)Mika P (2007) Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. J Web Semant 5(1):5–15Montaner M, López B, de la Rosa JL (2002) Opinion-based filtering through trust. In: Cooperative information agents VI, LNCS, vol 2446, pp 127–144Ontañón S, Plaza E (2008) Argumentation-based information exchange in prediction markets. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMASPazzani MJ, Billsus D (2007) Content-based recommendation systems. In: The adaptive web, LNCS, vol 4321, pp 325–341Rahwan I, Zablith F, Reed C (2007) Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif Intell 171(10–15):897–921Rahwan I, Banihashemi B (2008) Arguments in OWL: a progress report. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA), pp 297–310Reed C, Walton D (2007) Argumentation schemes in dialogue. In: Dissensus and the search for common ground, OSSA-07, volume CD-ROM, pp 1–11Sabater J, Sierra C (2002) Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 1, pp 475–482Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 5:115–153Schafer JB, Frankowski D, Herlocker J, Sen S (2007) Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: The adaptive web, LNCS, vol 4321, pp 291–324Schneider J, Groza T, Passant A (2012) A review of argumentation for the aocial semantic web. Semantic web-interoperability, usability, applicability. IOS Press, Washington, DCTempich C, Pinto HS, Sure Y, Staab S (2005) An argumentation ontology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In: Proceedings of the 2nd European semantic web conference, ESWC, pp 241–256Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKTrojahn C, Quaresma P, Vieira R, Isaac A (2009) Comparing argumentation frameworks for composite ontology matching. in: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMASTruthMapping. http://truthmapping.com/Walter FE, Battiston S, Schweitzer F (2007) A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network. J Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 16(1):57–74Walton D, Krabbe E (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, New York, NYWalton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeWells S, Gourlay C, Reed C (2009) Argument blogging. Computational models of natural argument, CMNAWyner A, Schneider J (2012) Arguing from a point of view. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on agreement technologie

A flexible service selection for executing virtual services

[EN] With the adoption of a service-oriented paradigm on the Web, many software services are likely to fulfil similar functional needs for end-users. We propose to aggregate functionally equivalent software services within one single virtual service, that is, to associate a functionality, a graphical user interface (GUI), and a set of selection rules. When an end user invokes such a virtual service through its GUI to answer his/her functional need, the software service that best responds to the end-user s selection policy is selected and executed and the result is then rendered to the end-user through the GUI of the virtual service. A key innovation in this paper is the flexibility of our proposed service selection policy. First, each selection policy can refer to heterogeneous parameters (e.g., service price, end-user location, and QoS). Second, additional parameters can be added to an existing or new policy with little investment. Third, the end users themselves define a selection policy to apply during the selection process, thanks to the GUI element added as part of the virtual service design. This approach was validated though the design, implementation, and testing of an end-to-end architecture, including the implementation of several virtual services and utilizing several software services available today on the Web.This work was partially supported in part by SERVERY (Service Platform for Innovative Communication Environment), a CELTIC project that aims to create a Service Marketplace that bridges the Internet and Telco worlds by merging the flexibility and openness of the former with the trustworthiness and reliability of the latter, enabling effective and profitable cooperation among actors.Laga, N.; Bertin, E.; Crespi, N.; Bedini, I.; Molina Moreno, B.; Zhao, Z. (2013). A flexible service selection for executing virtual services. World Wide Web. 16(3):219-245. doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0184-2S219245163Aggarwal, R., Verma, K., Miller, J., and Milnor, W.: Constraint Driven Web Service Composition in METEOR-S. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international Conference on Services Computing (September 2004). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 23–30.Apple Inc. Apple app store.: Available at: www.apple.com/iphone/appstore/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Atzeni, P., Catarci, T., Pernici, B.: Multi-Channel adaptive information Systems. World Wide Web 10(4), 345–347 (2007)Baresi, L., Bianchini, D., Antonellis, V.D., Fugini, M.G., Pernici, B., Plebani, P.: Context-aware Composition of e-Service. In Technologies for E-Services: Third International Workshop, vol. 2819, 28–41, TES 2003, Berlin, German, 2003.Ben Hassine, A., Matsubara, S., Ishida, T.: In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web (ISWC’06), Isabel Cruz, Stefan Decker, Dean Allemang, Chris Preist, and Daniel Schwabe (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 130–143 (2006).Blum, N., Dutkowski, S., Magedanz, T.: InSeRt - An Intent-based Service Request API for Service Exposure in Next Generation Networks. In Proceedings of 32nd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop. Porto Sani Resort, Kassandra, Greece, 2008 pp21–30.Boussard, M., Fodor, S., Crespi, N., Iribarren, V., Le Rouzic, J.P., Bedini, I., Marton, G., Moro Fernandez, D., Lorenzo Duenas, O., Molina, B.: SERVERY: the Web-Telco marketplace. ICT-Mobile Summit 2009, Santander (2009)Cabrera, Ó., Oriol, M., Franch, X., Marco, J., López, L., Fragoso, O., Santaolaya, R.: WeSSQoS: A Configurable SOA System for Quality-aware Web Service Selection. CoRR 2011, abs/1110.5574.Casati, F., Ilnicki, S., Jin, L., Krishnamoorthy, V., Shan, M.: Adaptive and Dynamic Service Composition in eFlow. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 1789/2000, 13–31, 2000.Cibrán, M. A., Verheecke, B., Vanderperren, W., Suvée, D., and Jonckers, V.: “Aspect-oriented Programming for Dynamic Web Service Selection, Integration and Management.” In Proc. World Wide Web 2007, pp. 211–242.Crespi, N., Boussard, M. Fodor, S.: Converging Web 2.0 with telecommunications. eStrategies Projects, Vol. 10, 108–109. British Publishers, ISSN 1758–2369, June 2009.Dey, A.K., Salber, D., Abowd, G.D.: A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16, 1–67 (2001)Ding, Q., Li, X., and Zhou, X.: Reputation Based Service Selection in Grid Environment. In Proceedings of the 2008 international Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering - Volume 03 (December. 2008). CSSE. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 58–61.Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Thesis dissertation, 2000.Franch, X., Grünbacher, P., Oriol, M., Burgstaller, B., Dhungana, D., López, L., Marco, J., Pimentel, J.: Goal-driven Adaptation of Service-Based Systems from Runtime Monitoring Data. REFS 2011.Frolund, S., Koisten, J.: QML: A Language for Quality of Service Specification. HP Labs technical reports. Available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/98/HPL-98-10.html , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Google. Android market.: Available at: www.android.com/market/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Google. Intents and Intent Filters.: Available at http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/intents/intents-filters.html , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Gu, X., Nahrstedt, K., Yuan, W., Wichadakul, D., Xu, D.: An Xml-Based Quality of Service Enabling Language for the Web. Technical Report. UMI Order Number: UIUCDCS-R-2001-2212., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Laga, N., Bertin, E., and Crespi, N.: Building a User Friendly Service Dashboard: Automatic and Non-intrusive Chaining between Widgets. In Proceedings of the 2009 Congress on Services - I (July 06–10, 2009). SERVICES. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 484–491.Laga, N., Bertin, E., and Crespi, N.: Business Process Personalization Through Web Widgets. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international Conference on Web Services (July 05–10, 2010). ICWS. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 551–558.Liu, Y., Ngu, A. H., and Zeng, L. Z.: QoS computation and policing in dynamic web service selection. In Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers &Amp; Posters (New York, NY, USA, May 19–21, 2004). WWW Alt. ’04. ACM, New York, NY, 66–73.Malik, Z., Bouguettaya, A.: Rater credibility assessment in Web services interactions. World Wide Web 12(1), 3–25 (2009)Martin, D. et al.: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C member submission, available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-OWL-S-20041122/ , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Nestler, T., Namoun, A., Schill, A.: End-user development of service-based interactive web applications at the presentation layer. EICS 2011: 197–206.Newcomer, E.: Understanding Web Services: XML, Wsdl, Soap, and UDDI. Addison, Wesley, Boston, Mass., May 2002.O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0, Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.Piessens, F., Jacobs, B., Truyen, E., Joosen, W.: Support for Metadata-driven Selection of Run-time Services in .NET is Promising but Immature. vol. 3, no. 2, Special issue: .NET: The Programmer’s Perspective: ECOOP Workshop, 27–35. 2003.Rasch, K;, Li, F., Sehic, S., Ayani R., and Dustdar, S.: “Context-driven personalized service discovery in pervasive environments,” in Proc World Wide Web, 2011, pp. 295–319.Reichl, P.: From ‘Quality-of-Service’ and ‘Quality-of-Design’ to ‘Quality-of-Experience’: A holistic view on future interactive telecommunication ser-vices. In 15th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, 2007. Soft-COM 2007. Sept. 2007. vol., no.,1–6, 27–29.Rolland, C., Kaabi, R.S., Kraiem, N.: On ISOA: Intentional Services Oriented Architecture. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, volume 4495/2007, 158–172, June 2007.Sanchez, A., Carro, B., Wesner, S.: Telco services for end customers: European Perspective. In Communications Magazine. IEEE 46(2), 14–18 (2008)Santhanam, G. R., Basu, S., and Honavar, V.: On Utilizing Qualitative Preferences in Web Service Composition: A CP-net Based Approach. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Services, Services - Part I, vol., no.,538–544, 2008.Spanoudakis, G., Mahbub, K., Zisman, A.: A Platform for Context Aware Runtime Web Service Discovery. In Proc IEEE ICWS, 2007, pp233-240.Tsesmetzis, D., Roussaki, I., Sykas, E.: Modeling and Simulation of QoS-aware Web Service Selection for Provider Profit Maximization. Simulation 83(1), 93–106 (2007)Wang, P., Chao, K., Lo, C., Farmer, R., and Kuo, P.: A Reputation-Based Service Selection Scheme. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international Conference on E-Business Engineering (October 21–23, 2009). ICEBE. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 501–506.Wang, H., Yang, D., Zhao, Y., and Gao, Y.: Multiagent System for Reputation--based Web Services Selection. In Proceedings of the Sixth international Conference on Quality Software (October 27–28, 2006). QSIC. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 429–434.Wholesale Applications Community.: WAC Informational Whitepaper. Available at http://www.wholesaleappcommunity.com/About-Wac/BACKGROUND%20TO%20WAC/whitepaper.pdf , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Windows Marketplace.: Available at http://marketplace.windowsphone.com/default.aspx , accessed on May 22nd, 2012.Xu, Z., Martin, P., Powley, W., Zulkernine, F.: Reputation-Enhanced QoS-based Web Services Discovery. Web Services, 2007. In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2007. 249, 256, 9–13 July 2007.Yu, Q., Bouguettaya,A.: “Multi-attribute optimization in service selection”. In Proc World Wide Web,2012, pp. 1–31.Yu, T., Zhang, Y., Lin, K. Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints. ACM Transaction Web 1, 1. Article 6, 26 pages. (May 2007),

Adaptive hypermedia for education and training

Adaptive hypermedia (AH) is an alternative to the traditional, one-size-fits-all approach in the development of hypermedia systems. AH systems build a model of the goals, preferences, and knowledge of each individual user; this model is used throughout the interaction with the user to adapt to the needs of that particular user (Brusilovsky, 1996b). For example, a student in an adaptive educational hypermedia system will be given a presentation that is adapted specifically to his or her knowledge of the subject (De Bra & Calvi, 1998; Hothi, Hall, & Sly, 2000) as well as a suggested set of the most relevant links to proceed further (Brusilovsky, Eklund, & Schwarz, 1998; Kavcic, 2004). An adaptive electronic encyclopedia will personalize the content of an article to augment the user's existing knowledge and interests (Bontcheva & Wilks, 2005; Milosavljevic, 1997). A museum guide will adapt the presentation about every visited object to the user's individual path through the museum (Oberlander et al., 1998; Stock et al., 2007). Adaptive hypermedia belongs to the class of user-adaptive systems (Schneider-Hufschmidt, Kühme, & Malinowski, 1993). A distinctive feature of an adaptive system is an explicit user model that represents user knowledge, goals, and interests, as well as other features that enable the system to adapt to different users with their own specific set of goals. An adaptive system collects data for the user model from various sources that can include implicitly observing user interaction and explicitly requesting direct input from the user. The user model is applied to provide an adaptation effect, that is, tailor interaction to different users in the same context. In different kinds of adaptive systems, adaptation effects could vary greatly. In AH systems, it is limited to three major adaptation technologies: adaptive content selection, adaptive navigation support, and adaptive presentation. The first of these three technologies comes from the fields of adaptive information retrieval (IR) and intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). When the user searches for information, the system adaptively selects and prioritizes the most relevant items (Brajnik, Guida, & Tasso, 1987; Brusilovsky, 1992b)

A spiral model for adding automatic, adaptive authoring to adaptive hypermedia

At present a large amount of research exists into the design and implementation of adaptive systems. However, not many target the complex task of authoring in such systems, or their evaluation. In order to tackle these problems, we have looked into the causes of the complexity. Manual annotation has proven to be a bottleneck for authoring of adaptive hypermedia. One such solution is the reuse of automatically generated metadata. In our previous work we have proposed the integration of the generic Adaptive Hypermedia authoring environment, MOT ( My Online Teacher), and a semantic desktop environment, indexed by Beagle++. A prototype, Sesame2MOT Enricher v1, was built based upon this integration approach and evaluated. After the initial evaluations, a web-based prototype was built (web-based Sesame2MOT Enricher v2 application) and integrated in MOT v2, conforming with the findings of the first set of evaluations. This new prototype underwent another evaluation. This paper thus does a synthesis of the approach in general, the initial prototype, with its first evaluations, the improved prototype and the first results from the most recent evaluation round, following the next implementation cycle of the spiral model [Boehm, 88]

A survey of QoS-aware web service composition techniques

Web service composition can be briefly described as the process of aggregating services with disparate functionalities into a new composite service in order to meet increasingly complex needs of users. Service composition process has been accurate on dealing with services having disparate functionalities, however, over the years the number of web services in particular that exhibit similar functionalities and varying Quality of Service (QoS) has significantly increased. As such, the problem becomes how to select appropriate web services such that the QoS of the resulting composite service is maximized or, in some cases, minimized. This constitutes an NP-hard problem as it is complicated and difficult to solve. In this paper, a discussion of concepts of web service composition and a holistic review of current service composition techniques proposed in literature is presented. Our review spans several publications in the field that can serve as a road map for future research

Defining adaptation in a generic multi layer model : CAM: the GRAPPLE conceptual adaptation model

Authoring of Adaptive Hypermedia is a difficult and time consuming task. Reference models like LAOS and AHAM separate adaptation and content in different layers. Systems like AHA! offer graphical tools based on these models to allow authors to define adaptation without knowing any adaptation language. The adaptation that can be defined using such tools is still limited. Authoring systems like MOT are more flexible, but usability of adaptation specification is low. This paper proposes a more generic model which allows the adaptation to be defined in an arbitrary number of layers, where adaptation is expressed in terms of relationships between concepts. This model allows the creation of more powerful yet easier to use graphical authoring tools. This paper presents the structure of the Conceptual Adaptation Models used in adaptive applications created within the GRAPPLE adaptive learning environment, and their representation in a graphical authoring tool