2,088 research outputs found
The Spectrum of Strong Behavioral Equivalences for Nondeterministic and Probabilistic Processes
We present a spectrum of trace-based, testing, and bisimulation equivalences
for nondeterministic and probabilistic processes whose activities are all
observable. For every equivalence under study, we examine the discriminating
power of three variants stemming from three approaches that differ for the way
probabilities of events are compared when nondeterministic choices are resolved
via deterministic schedulers. We show that the first approach - which compares
two resolutions relatively to the probability distributions of all considered
events - results in a fragment of the spectrum compatible with the spectrum of
behavioral equivalences for fully probabilistic processes. In contrast, the
second approach - which compares the probabilities of the events of a
resolution with the probabilities of the same events in possibly different
resolutions - gives rise to another fragment composed of coarser equivalences
that exhibits several analogies with the spectrum of behavioral equivalences
for fully nondeterministic processes. Finally, the third approach - which only
compares the extremal probabilities of each event stemming from the different
resolutions - yields even coarser equivalences that, however, give rise to a
hierarchy similar to that stemming from the second approach.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2013, arXiv:1306.241
A uniform framework for modelling nondeterministic, probabilistic, stochastic, or mixed processes and their behavioral equivalences
Labeled transition systems are typically used as behavioral models of concurrent processes, and the labeled transitions define the a one-step state-to-state reachability relation. This model can be made generalized by modifying the transition relation to associate a state reachability distribution, rather than a single target state, with any pair of source state and transition label. The state reachability distribution becomes a function mapping each possible target state to a value that expresses the degree of one-step reachability of that state. Values are taken from a preordered set equipped with a minimum that denotes unreachability. By selecting suitable preordered sets, the resulting model, called ULTraS from Uniform Labeled Transition System, can be specialized to capture well-known models of fully nondeterministic processes (LTS), fully
probabilistic processes (ADTMC), fully stochastic processes (ACTMC), and of nondeterministic and probabilistic (MDP) or nondeterministic and stochastic (CTMDP) processes. This uniform treatment of different behavioral models extends to behavioral equivalences. These can be defined on ULTraS by relying on appropriate measure functions that expresses the degree of reachability of a set of states when performing
single-step or multi-step computations. It is shown that the specializations of bisimulation, trace, and testing
equivalences for the different classes of ULTraS coincide with the behavioral equivalences defined in the literature over traditional models
Uniform Labeled Transition Systems for Nondeterministic, Probabilistic, and Stochastic Process Calculi
Labeled transition systems are typically used to represent the behavior of
nondeterministic processes, with labeled transitions defining a one-step state
to-state reachability relation. This model has been recently made more general
by modifying the transition relation in such a way that it associates with any
source state and transition label a reachability distribution, i.e., a function
mapping each possible target state to a value of some domain that expresses the
degree of one-step reachability of that target state. In this extended
abstract, we show how the resulting model, called ULTraS from Uniform Labeled
Transition System, can be naturally used to give semantics to a fully
nondeterministic, a fully probabilistic, and a fully stochastic variant of a
CSP-like process language.Comment: In Proceedings PACO 2011, arXiv:1108.145
Testing Reactive Probabilistic Processes
We define a testing equivalence in the spirit of De Nicola and Hennessy for
reactive probabilistic processes, i.e. for processes where the internal
nondeterminism is due to random behaviour. We characterize the testing
equivalence in terms of ready-traces. From the characterization it follows that
the equivalence is insensitive to the exact moment in time in which an internal
probabilistic choice occurs, which is inherent from the original testing
equivalence of De Nicola and Hennessy. We also show decidability of the testing
equivalence for finite systems for which the complete model may not be known
Markovian Testing Equivalence and Exponentially Timed Internal Actions
In the theory of testing for Markovian processes developed so far,
exponentially timed internal actions are not admitted within processes. When
present, these actions cannot be abstracted away, because their execution takes
a nonzero amount of time and hence can be observed. On the other hand, they
must be carefully taken into account, in order not to equate processes that are
distinguishable from a timing viewpoint. In this paper, we recast the
definition of Markovian testing equivalence in the framework of a Markovian
process calculus including exponentially timed internal actions. Then, we show
that the resulting behavioral equivalence is a congruence, has a sound and
complete axiomatization, has a modal logic characterization, and can be decided
in polynomial time
Making Random Choices Invisible to the Scheduler
When dealing with process calculi and automata which express both
nondeterministic and probabilistic behavior, it is customary to introduce the
notion of scheduler to solve the nondeterminism. It has been observed that for
certain applications, notably those in security, the scheduler needs to be
restricted so not to reveal the outcome of the protocol's random choices, or
otherwise the model of adversary would be too strong even for ``obviously
correct'' protocols. We propose a process-algebraic framework in which the
control on the scheduler can be specified in syntactic terms, and we show how
to apply it to solve the problem mentioned above. We also consider the
definition of (probabilistic) may and must preorders, and we show that they are
precongruences with respect to the restricted schedulers. Furthermore, we show
that all the operators of the language, except replication, distribute over
probabilistic summation, which is a useful property for verification
Revisiting bisimilarity and its modal logic for nondeterministic and probabilistic processes
We consider PML, the probabilistic version of Hennessy-Milner logic introduced by Larsen and Skou to characterize bisimilarity over probabilistic processes without internal
nondeterminism.We provide two different interpretations for PML by considering nondeterministic and probabilistic processes as models, and we exhibit two new bisimulation-based equivalences that are in full agreement with those interpretations. Our new equivalences include
as coarsest congruences the two bisimilarities for nondeterministic and probabilistic processes proposed by Segala and Lynch. The latter equivalences are instead in agreement with two versions of Hennessy-Milner logic extended with an additional probabilistic operator
interpreted over state distributions rather than over individual states. Thus, our new interpretations of PML and the corresponding new bisimilarities offer a uniform framework for reasoning on processes that are purely nondeterministic or reactive probabilistic or are mixing nondeterminism and probability in an alternating/non-alternating way
Language-based Abstractions for Dynamical Systems
Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are the primary means to modelling
dynamical systems in many natural and engineering sciences. The number of
equations required to describe a system with high heterogeneity limits our
capability of effectively performing analyses. This has motivated a large body
of research, across many disciplines, into abstraction techniques that provide
smaller ODE systems while preserving the original dynamics in some appropriate
sense. In this paper we give an overview of a recently proposed
computer-science perspective to this problem, where ODE reduction is recast to
finding an appropriate equivalence relation over ODE variables, akin to
classical models of computation based on labelled transition systems.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2017, arXiv:1707.0366
Characterising Testing Preorders for Finite Probabilistic Processes
In 1992 Wang & Larsen extended the may- and must preorders of De Nicola and
Hennessy to processes featuring probabilistic as well as nondeterministic
choice. They concluded with two problems that have remained open throughout the
years, namely to find complete axiomatisations and alternative
characterisations for these preorders. This paper solves both problems for
finite processes with silent moves. It characterises the may preorder in terms
of simulation, and the must preorder in terms of failure simulation. It also
gives a characterisation of both preorders using a modal logic. Finally it
axiomatises both preorders over a probabilistic version of CSP.Comment: 33 page
- …