Synchronous and asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers

In this work, we present two synchronizer groups: the synchronous and the asynchronous. The synchronous group is based in forward logic with flip flops and the asynchronous group is based in forward logic with delay line feedback. In each group we consider two versions: the manual and the automatic. The main objective is to study the two groups, each one with two versions and to observe its jitter performance as function of the noise

Asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by positive transitions at half bit rate

This work presents the asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by positive transitions at half bit rate. Their performance will be compared with the reference asynchronous symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by both transitions at bit rate. For the reference and proposed variants, we consider two versions which are the manual (m) and the automatic (a). The objective is to study the four synchronizers and evaluate their output jitter UIRMS (Unit Interval Root Mean Square) versus input SNR (Signal Noise Ratio)

Asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by both transitions at half bit rate

This work studies the asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by both transitions at half bit rate. Their performance will be compared with the reference asynchronous symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by both transitions at bit rate. For the reference and proposed variants, we consider two versions which are the manual (m) and the automatic (a). The objective is to study the four synchronizers and evaluate their output jitter UIRMS (Unit Interval Root Mean Square) versus input SNR (Signal Noise Ratio)

Asynchronous Sequential Symbol Synchronizers based on Pulse Comparison by Hybrid Transitions at Quarter Bit Rate

This work studies the asynchronous sequential symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by hybrid (both and positive) transitions at quarter bit rate. Their performance will be compared with the standard reference asynchronous symbol synchronizers based on pulse comparison by both transitions at bit rate. For the reference and proposed variants, we consider two versions which are the manual (m) and the automatic (a). The objective is to study the four synchronizers and evaluate their output jitter UIRMS (Unit Interval Root Mean Square) versus input SNR (Signal Noise Ratio).University of Beira Interiorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Asynchronous techniques for system-on-chip design

SoC design will require asynchronous techniques as the large parameter variations across the chip will make it impossible to control delays in clock networks and other global signals efficiently. Initially, SoCs will be globally asynchronous and locally synchronous (GALS). But the complexity of the numerous asynchronous/synchronous interfaces required in a GALS will eventually lead to entirely asynchronous solutions. This paper introduces the main design principles, methods, and building blocks for asynchronous VLSI systems, with an emphasis on communication and synchronization. Asynchronous circuits with the only delay assumption of isochronic forks are called quasi-delay-insensitive (QDI). QDI is used in the paper as the basis for asynchronous logic. The paper discusses asynchronous handshake protocols for communication and the notion of validity/neutrality tests, and completion tree. Basic building blocks for sequencing, storage, function evaluation, and buses are described, and two alternative methods for the implementation of an arbitrary computation are explained. Issues of arbitration, and synchronization play an important role in complex distributed systems and especially in GALS. The two main asynchronous/synchronous interfaces needed in GALS-one based on synchronizer, the other on stoppable clock-are described and analyzed

Design of variation-tolerant synchronizers for multiple clock and voltage domains

PhD ThesisParametric variability increasingly affects the performance of electronic circuits as the fabrication technology has reached the level of 32nm and beyond. These parameters may include transistor Process parameters (such as threshold voltage), supply Voltage and Temperature (PVT), all of which could have a significant impact on the speed and power consumption of the circuit, particularly if the variations exceed the design margins. As systems are designed with more asynchronous protocols, there is a need for highly robust synchronizers and arbiters. These components are often used as interfaces between communication links of different timing domains as well as sampling devices for asynchronous inputs coming from external components. These applications have created a need for new robust designs of synchronizers and arbiters that can tolerate process, voltage and temperature variations. The aim of this study was to investigate how synchronizers and arbiters should be designed to tolerate parametric variations. All investigations focused mainly on circuit-level and transistor level designs and were modeled and simulated in the UMC90nm CMOS technology process. Analog simulations were used to measure timing parameters and power consumption along with a “Monte Carlo” statistical analysis to account for process variations. Two main components of synchronizers and arbiters were primarily investigated: flip-flop and mutual-exclusion element (MUTEX). Both components can violate the input timing conditions, setup and hold window times, which could cause metastability inside their bistable elements and possibly end in failures. The mean-time between failures is an important reliability feature of any synchronizer delay through the synchronizer. The MUTEX study focused on the classical circuit, in addition to a number of tolerance, based on increasing internal gain by adding current sources, reducing the capacitive loading, boosting the transconductance of the latch, compensating the existing Miller capacitance, and adding asymmetry to maneuver the metastable point. The results showed that some circuits had little or almost no improvements, while five techniques showed significant improvements by reducing τ and maintaining high tolerance. Three design approaches are proposed to provide variation-tolerant synchronizers. wagging synchronizer proposed to First, the is significantly increase reliability over that of the conventional two flip-flop synchronizer. The robustness of the wagging technique can be enhanced by using robust τ latches or adding one more cycle of synchronization. The second approach is the Metastability Auto-Detection and Correction (MADAC) latch which relies on swiftly detecting a metastable event and correcting it by enforcing the previously stored logic value. This technique significantly reduces the resolution time down from uncertain synchronization technique is proposed to transfer signals between Multiple- Voltage Multiple-Clock Domains (MVD/MCD) that do not require conventional level-shifters between the domains or multiple power supplies within each domain. This interface circuit uses a synchronous set and feedback reset protocol which provides level-shifting and synchronization of all signals between the domains, from a wide range of voltage-supplies and clock frequencies. Overall, synchronizer circuits can tolerate variations to a greater extent by employing the wagging technique or using a MADAC latch, while MUTEX tolerance can suffice with small circuit modifications. Communication between MVD/MCD can be achieved by an asynchronous handshake without a need for adding level-shifters.The Saudi Arabian Embassy in London, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabi

The Architecture and Programming of a Fine-Grain Multicomputer

The research presented in this thesis was conducted in the context of the Mosaic C, an experimental, fine-grain multicomputer. The objective of the Mosaic experiment was to develop a concurrent-computing system with maximum performance per unit cost, while still retaining a general-purpose application span. A stipulation of the Mosaic project was that the complexity of a Mosaic node be limited by the silicon complexity available on a single VLSI chip. The two most important original results reported in the thesis are: (1) The design and implementation of C+-, a concurrent, object-oriented programming system. Syntactically, C+- is an extension of C++. The concurrent semantics of C+- are contained within the process concept. A C+- process is analogous to a C++ object, but it is also an autonomous computing agent, and a unit of potential concurrency. Atomic single-process updates that can be individually enabled and disabled are the execution units of the concurrent computation. The limited set of primitives that C+- provides is shown to be sufficient to express a variety of concurrent-programming problems concisely and efficiently. An important design requirement for C+- was that efficient implementations should exist on a variety of concurrent architectures, and, in particular, on the simple and inexpensive hardware of the Mosaic node. The Mosaic runtime system was written entirely in C+-. (2) Pipeline synchronization, a novel, generally- applicable technique for hardware synchronization. This technique is a simple, low-cost, high-bandwidth, high- reliability solution to interfaces between synchronous and asynchronous systems, or between synchronous systems operating from different clocks. The technique can sustain the full communication bandwidth and achieve an arbitrarily low, non-zero probability of synchronization failure, Pf, with the price in both latency and chip area being O(log 1/Pf). Pipeline synchronization has been successfully applied to the highperformance inter-computer communication in Mosaic node ensembles

Gradual Synchronization

A synchronization solution is developed in order to allow finer grained segmentation of clock domains on a chip. This solution incorporates computation into the synchronization overhead time and is called Gradual Synchronization. With Gradual Synchronization as a synchronization method the design space of a chip could easily mix both asynchronous and synchronous blocks of logic, paving the way for wider use of asynchronous logic design