1,381 research outputs found

    Bidimensionality and Geometric Graphs

    Full text link
    In this paper we use several of the key ideas from Bidimensionality to give a new generic approach to design EPTASs and subexponential time parameterized algorithms for problems on classes of graphs which are not minor closed, but instead exhibit a geometric structure. In particular we present EPTASs and subexponential time parameterized algorithms for Feedback Vertex Set, Vertex Cover, Connected Vertex Cover, Diamond Hitting Set, on map graphs and unit disk graphs, and for Cycle Packing and Minimum-Vertex Feedback Edge Set on unit disk graphs. Our results are based on the recent decomposition theorems proved by Fomin et al [SODA 2011], and our algorithms work directly on the input graph. Thus it is not necessary to compute the geometric representations of the input graph. To the best of our knowledge, these results are previously unknown, with the exception of the EPTAS and a subexponential time parameterized algorithm on unit disk graphs for Vertex Cover, which were obtained by Marx [ESA 2005] and Alber and Fiala [J. Algorithms 2004], respectively. We proceed to show that our approach can not be extended in its full generality to more general classes of geometric graphs, such as intersection graphs of unit balls in R^d, d >= 3. Specifically we prove that Feedback Vertex Set on unit-ball graphs in R^3 neither admits PTASs unless P=NP, nor subexponential time algorithms unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Additionally, we show that the decomposition theorems which our approach is based on fail for disk graphs and that therefore any extension of our results to disk graphs would require new algorithmic ideas. On the other hand, we prove that our EPTASs and subexponential time algorithms for Vertex Cover and Connected Vertex Cover carry over both to disk graphs and to unit-ball graphs in R^d for every fixed d

    Beyond Bidimensionality: Parameterized Subexponential Algorithms on Directed Graphs

    Get PDF
    We develop two different methods to achieve subexponential time parameterized algorithms for problems on sparse directed graphs. We exemplify our approaches with two well studied problems. For the first problem, {\sc kk-Leaf Out-Branching}, which is to find an oriented spanning tree with at least kk leaves, we obtain an algorithm solving the problem in time 2O(klogk)n+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k} \log k)} n+ n^{O(1)} on directed graphs whose underlying undirected graph excludes some fixed graph HH as a minor. For the special case when the input directed graph is planar, the running time can be improved to 2O(k)n+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k})}n + n^{O(1)}. The second example is a generalization of the {\sc Directed Hamiltonian Path} problem, namely {\sc kk-Internal Out-Branching}, which is to find an oriented spanning tree with at least kk internal vertices. We obtain an algorithm solving the problem in time 2O(klogk)+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k} \log k)} + n^{O(1)} on directed graphs whose underlying undirected graph excludes some fixed apex graph HH as a minor. Finally, we observe that for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the {\sc kk-Directed Path} problem is solvable in time O((1+ϵ)knf(ϵ))O((1+\epsilon)^k n^{f(\epsilon)}), where ff is some function of \ve. Our methods are based on non-trivial combinations of obstruction theorems for undirected graphs, kernelization, problem specific combinatorial structures and a layering technique similar to the one employed by Baker to obtain PTAS for planar graphs

    Fast Biclustering by Dual Parameterization

    Get PDF
    We study two clustering problems, Starforest Editing, the problem of adding and deleting edges to obtain a disjoint union of stars, and the generalization Bicluster Editing. We show that, in addition to being NP-hard, none of the problems can be solved in subexponential time unless the exponential time hypothesis fails. Misra, Panolan, and Saurabh (MFCS 2013) argue that introducing a bound on the number of connected components in the solution should not make the problem easier: In particular, they argue that the subexponential time algorithm for editing to a fixed number of clusters (p-Cluster Editing) by Fomin et al. (J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 80(7) 2014) is an exception rather than the rule. Here, p is a secondary parameter, bounding the number of components in the solution. However, upon bounding the number of stars or bicliques in the solution, we obtain algorithms which run in time 25pk+O(n+m)2^{5 \sqrt{pk}} + O(n+m) for p-Starforest Editing and 2O(pklog(pk))+O(n+m)2^{O(p \sqrt{k} \log(pk))} + O(n+m) for p-Bicluster Editing. We obtain a similar result for the more general case of t-Partite p-Cluster Editing. This is subexponential in k for fixed number of clusters, since p is then considered a constant. Our results even out the number of multivariate subexponential time algorithms and give reasons to believe that this area warrants further study.Comment: Accepted for presentation at IPEC 201

    Exploring Subexponential Parameterized Complexity of Completion Problems

    Get PDF
    Let F{\cal F} be a family of graphs. In the F{\cal F}-Completion problem, we are given a graph GG and an integer kk as input, and asked whether at most kk edges can be added to GG so that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F{\cal F} as an induced subgraph. It appeared recently that special cases of F{\cal F}-Completion, the problem of completing into a chordal graph known as Minimum Fill-in, corresponding to the case of F={C4,C5,C6,}{\cal F}=\{C_4,C_5,C_6,\ldots\}, and the problem of completing into a split graph, i.e., the case of F={C4,2K2,C5}{\cal F}=\{C_4, 2K_2, C_5\}, are solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})}n^{O(1)}. The exploration of this phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on F{\cal F}-Completion. In this paper we prove that completions into several well studied classes of graphs without long induced cycles also admit parameterized subexponential time algorithms by showing that: - The problem Trivially Perfect Completion is solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})}n^{O(1)}, that is F{\cal F}-Completion for F={C4,P4}{\cal F} =\{C_4, P_4\}, a cycle and a path on four vertices. - The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case where F={2K2,C4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, C_4\}, and Threshold Completion, where F={2K2,P4,C4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, P_4, C_4\}, are also solvable in time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})} n^{O(1)}. We complement our algorithms for F{\cal F}-Completion with the following lower bounds: - For F={2K2}{\cal F} = \{2K_2\}, F={C4}{\cal F} = \{C_4\}, F={P4}{\cal F} = \{P_4\}, and F={2K2,P4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, P_4\}, F{\cal F}-Completion cannot be solved in time 2o(k)nO(1)2^{o(k)} n^{O(1)} unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential parameterized complexity of F{\cal F}-Completion problems for F{2K2,C4,P4}{\cal F}\subseteq\{2K_2, C_4, P_4\}.Comment: 32 pages, 16 figures, A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the proceedings of STACS'1

    Optimality program in segment and string graphs

    Full text link
    Planar graphs are known to allow subexponential algorithms running in time 2O(n)2^{O(\sqrt n)} or 2O(nlogn)2^{O(\sqrt n \log n)} for most of the paradigmatic problems, while the brute-force time 2Θ(n)2^{\Theta(n)} is very likely to be asymptotically best on general graphs. Intrigued by an algorithm packing curves in 2O(n2/3logn)2^{O(n^{2/3}\log n)} by Fox and Pach [SODA'11], we investigate which problems have subexponential algorithms on the intersection graphs of curves (string graphs) or segments (segment intersection graphs) and which problems have no such algorithms under the ETH (Exponential Time Hypothesis). Among our results, we show that, quite surprisingly, 3-Coloring can also be solved in time 2O(n2/3logO(1)n)2^{O(n^{2/3}\log^{O(1)}n)} on string graphs while an algorithm running in time 2o(n)2^{o(n)} for 4-Coloring even on axis-parallel segments (of unbounded length) would disprove the ETH. For 4-Coloring of unit segments, we show a weaker ETH lower bound of 2o(n2/3)2^{o(n^{2/3})} which exploits the celebrated Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres theorem. The subexponential running time also carries over to Min Feedback Vertex Set but not to Min Dominating Set and Min Independent Dominating Set.Comment: 19 pages, 15 figure

    Parameterized lower bound and NP-completeness of some HH-free Edge Deletion problems

    Get PDF
    For a graph HH, the HH-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most kk edges whose deletion from the input graph GG results in a graph without any induced copy of HH. We prove that HH-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if HH is a graph with at least two edges and HH has a component with maximum number of vertices which is a tree or a regular graph. Furthermore, we obtain that these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time 2o(k)GO(1)2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.Comment: 15 pages, COCOA 15 accepted pape
    corecore