169 research outputs found
Exploring Subexponential Parameterized Complexity of Completion Problems
Let be a family of graphs. In the -Completion problem,
we are given a graph and an integer as input, and asked whether at most
edges can be added to so that the resulting graph does not contain a
graph from as an induced subgraph. It appeared recently that special
cases of -Completion, the problem of completing into a chordal graph
known as Minimum Fill-in, corresponding to the case of , and the problem of completing into a split graph,
i.e., the case of , are solvable in parameterized
subexponential time . The exploration of this
phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on -Completion.
In this paper we prove that completions into several well studied classes of
graphs without long induced cycles also admit parameterized subexponential time
algorithms by showing that:
- The problem Trivially Perfect Completion is solvable in parameterized
subexponential time , that is -Completion for , a cycle and a path on four
vertices.
- The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case
where , and Threshold Completion, where , are also solvable in time .
We complement our algorithms for -Completion with the following
lower bounds:
- For , , , and
, -Completion cannot be solved in time
unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails.
Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential
parameterized complexity of -Completion problems for .Comment: 32 pages, 16 figures, A preliminary version of this paper appeared in
the proceedings of STACS'1
Fast Biclustering by Dual Parameterization
We study two clustering problems, Starforest Editing, the problem of adding
and deleting edges to obtain a disjoint union of stars, and the generalization
Bicluster Editing. We show that, in addition to being NP-hard, none of the
problems can be solved in subexponential time unless the exponential time
hypothesis fails.
Misra, Panolan, and Saurabh (MFCS 2013) argue that introducing a bound on the
number of connected components in the solution should not make the problem
easier: In particular, they argue that the subexponential time algorithm for
editing to a fixed number of clusters (p-Cluster Editing) by Fomin et al. (J.
Comput. Syst. Sci., 80(7) 2014) is an exception rather than the rule. Here, p
is a secondary parameter, bounding the number of components in the solution.
However, upon bounding the number of stars or bicliques in the solution, we
obtain algorithms which run in time for p-Starforest
Editing and for p-Bicluster Editing. We
obtain a similar result for the more general case of t-Partite p-Cluster
Editing. This is subexponential in k for fixed number of clusters, since p is
then considered a constant.
Our results even out the number of multivariate subexponential time
algorithms and give reasons to believe that this area warrants further study.Comment: Accepted for presentation at IPEC 201
Polynomial kernelization for removing induced claws and diamonds
A graph is called (claw,diamond)-free if it contains neither a claw (a
) nor a diamond (a with an edge removed) as an induced subgraph.
Equivalently, (claw,diamond)-free graphs can be characterized as line graphs of
triangle-free graphs, or as linear dominoes, i.e., graphs in which every vertex
is in at most two maximal cliques and every edge is in exactly one maximal
clique.
In this paper we consider the parameterized complexity of the
(claw,diamond)-free Edge Deletion problem, where given a graph and a
parameter , the question is whether one can remove at most edges from
to obtain a (claw,diamond)-free graph. Our main result is that this problem
admits a polynomial kernel. We complement this finding by proving that, even on
instances with maximum degree , the problem is NP-complete and cannot be
solved in time unless the Exponential Time
Hypothesis fai
A survey of parameterized algorithms and the complexity of edge modification
The survey is a comprehensive overview of the developing area of parameterized algorithms for graph modification problems. It describes state of the art in kernelization, subexponential algorithms, and parameterized complexity of graph modification. The main focus is on edge modification problems, where the task is to change some adjacencies in a graph to satisfy some required properties. To facilitate further research, we list many open problems in the area.publishedVersio
Fast Biclustering by Dual Parameterization
We study two clustering problems, Starforest Editing, the problem of adding and deleting edges to obtain a disjoint union of stars, and the generalization Bicluster Editing. We show that, in addition to being NP-hard, none of the problems can be solved in subexponential time unless the exponential time hypothesis fails.
Misra, Panolan, and Saurabh (MFCS 2013) argue that introducing a bound on the number of connected components in the solution should not make the problem easier: In particular, they argue that the subexponential time algorithm for editing to a fixed number of clusters (p-Cluster Editing) by Fomin et al. (J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 80(7) 2014) is an exception rather than the rule. Here, p is a secondary parameter, bounding the number of components in the solution.
However, upon bounding the number of stars or bicliques in the solution, we obtain algorithms which run in time O(2^{3*sqrt(pk)} + n + m) for p-Starforest Editing and O(2^{O(p * sqrt(k) * log(pk))} + n + m) for p-Bicluster Editing. We obtain a similar result for the more general case of t-Partite p-Cluster Editing. This is subexponential in k for a fixed number of clusters, since p is then considered a constant.
Our results even out the number of multivariate subexponential time algorithms and give reasons to believe that this area warrants further study
Polynomial Kernelization for Removing Induced Claws and Diamonds
A graph is called (claw,diamond)-free if it contains neither a claw (a ) nor a diamond (a with an edge removed) as an induced subgraph. Equivalently, (claw,diamond)-free graphs can be characterized as line graphs of triangle-free graphs, or as linear dominoes, i.e., graphs in which every vertex is in at most two maximal cliques and every edge is in exactly one maximal clique. In this paper we consider the parameterized complexity of the (claw,diamond)-free Edge Deletion problem, where given a graph and a parameter , the question is whether one can remove at most edges from to obtain a (claw,diamond)-free graph. Our main result is that this problem admits a polynomial kernel. We complement this finding by proving that, even on instances with maximum degree , the problem is NP-complete and cannot be solved in time unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fai
- …