Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forensic Science International. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Forensic Science International, Vol 155, Issue 2 (20 December 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.007The Bayesian approach provides a unified and logical framework for the analysis of evidence and to provide results in the form of likelihood ratios (LR) from the forensic laboratory to court. In this contribution we want to clarify how the biometric scientist or laboratory can adapt their conventional biometric systems or technologies to work according to this Bayesian approach. Forensic systems providing their results in the form of LR will be assessed through Tippett plots, which give a clear representation of the LR-based performance both for targets (the suspect is the author/source of the test pattern) and non-targets. However, the computation procedures of the LR values, especially with biometric evidences, are still an open issue. Reliable estimation techniques showing good generalization properties for the estimation of the between- and within-source variabilities of the test pattern are required, as variance restriction techniques in the within-source density estimation to stand for the variability of the source with the course of time. Fingerprint, face and on-line signature recognition systems will be adapted to work according to this Bayesian approach showing both the likelihood ratios range in each application and the adequacy of these biometric techniques to the daily forensic work.This work has been partially supported under MCYT Projects TIC2000-1683, TIC2000-1669, TIC2003-09068, TIC2003-08382 and Spanish Police Force ‘‘Guardia Civil’’ Research Program

Biometrics — Developments and Potential

This article describes the use of biometric technology in forensic science, for the development of new methods and tools, improving the current forensic biometric applications, and allowing for the creation of new ones. The article begins with a definition and a summary of the development of this field. It then describes the data and automated biometric modalities of interest in forensic science and the forensic applications embedding biometric technology. On this basis, it describes the solutions and limitations of the current practice regarding the data, the technology, and the inference models. Finally, it proposes research orientations for the improvement of the current forensic biometric applications and suggests some ideas for the development of some new forensic biometric applications

The individual and the system : Assessing the stability of the output of a semi-automatic forensic voice comparison system

Semi-automatic systems based on traditional linguistic-phonetic features are increasingly being used for forensic voice comparison (FVC) casework. In this paper, we examine the stability of the output of a semi-automatic system, based on the long-term formant distributions (LTFDs) of F1, F2, and F3, as the channel quality of the input recordings decreases. Cross-validated, calibrated GMM-UBM log likelihood-ratios (LLRs) were computed for 97 Standard Southern British English speakers under four conditions. In each condition the same speech material was used, but the technical properties of the recordings changed (high quality studio recording, landline telephone recording, high bit-rate GSM mobile telephone recording and low bit-rate GSM mobile telephone recording). Equal error rate (EER) and the log LR cost function (Cllr) were compared across conditions. System validity was found to decrease with poorer technical quality, with the largest differences in EER (21.66%) and Cllr (0.46) found between the studio and the low bit-rate GSM conditions. However, importantly, performance for individual speakers was affected differently by channel quality. Speakers that produced stronger evidence overall were found to be more variable. Mean F3 was also found to be a predictor of LLR variability, however no effects were found based on speakers’ voice quality profiles

Information-theoretical comparison of evidence evaluation methods for score-based biometric systems

Ponencia presentada en la Seventh International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics, The University of Lausanne, Switzerland, August 2008Biometric systems are a powerful tool in many forensic disciplines in order to aid scientists to evaluate the weight of the evidence. However, uprising requirements of admissibility in forensic science demand scientific methods in order to test the accuracy of the forensic evidence evaluation process. In this work we analyze and compare several evidence analysis methods for score-based biometric systems. For all of them, the score given by the system is transformed into a likelihood ratio ( LR) which expresses the weight of the evidence. The accuracy of each LR computation method will be assessed by classical Tippett plots- We also propose measuring accuracy in terms of average information given by the evidence evaluation process, by means of Empirical Cross-Entropy (EC-E) plots. Preliminary results are presented using a voice biometric system and the NIST SRE 2006 experimental protocol

From biometric scores to forensic likelihood ratios

In this chapter, we describe the issue of the interpretation of forensic evidence from scores computed by a biometric system. This is one of themost important topics into the so-called area of forensic biometrics.We will show the importance of the topic, introducing some of the key concepts of forensic science with respect to the interpretation of results prior to their presentation in court, which is increasingly addressed by the computation of likelihood ratios (LR). We will describe the LR methodology, and will illustrate it with an example of the evaluation of fingerprint evidence in forensic conditions, by means of a fingerprint biometric system.</p

Biometrics in forensic science: challenges, lessons and new technologies

Biometrics has historically found its natural mate in Forensics. The first applications found in the literature and over cited so many times, are related to biometric measurements for the identification of multiple offenders from some of their biometric and anthropometric characteristics (tenprint cards) and individualization of offender from traces found on crime-scenes (e.g. fingermarks, earmarks, bitemarks, DNA). From sir Francis Galton, to the introduction of AFIS systems in the scientific laboratories of police departments, Biometrics and Forensics have been "dating" with alternate results and outcomes. As a matter of facts there are many technologies developed under the "Biometrics umbrella" which may be optimised to better impact several Forensic scenarios and criminal investigations. At the same time, there is an almost endless list of open problems and processes in Forensics which may benefit from the introduction of tailored Biometric technologies. Joining the two disciplines, on a proper scientific ground, may only result in the success for both fields, as well as a tangible benefit for the society. A number of Forensic processes may involve Biometric-related technologies, among them: Evidence evaluation, Forensic investigation, Forensic Intelligence, Surveillance, Forensic ID management and Verification.\ud The COST Action IC1106 funded by the European Commission, is trying to better understand how Biometric and Forensics synergies can be exploited within a pan-European scientific alliance which extends its scope to partners from USA, China and Australia.\ud Several results have been already accomplished pursuing research in this direction. Notably the studies in 2D and 3D face recognition have been gradually applied to the forensic investigation process. In this paper a few solutions will be presented to match 3D face shapes along with some experimental results

Language Dependency of Speaker Recognition Systems

One of many possible biometric identification methods is voice recognition. A voice recording can be compared to a suspect sample to determine whether suspect and perpetrator are the same. Often the necessary materials are not all available in the same language. This aspect called cross-language speaker recognition can make identification much more challenging. It is therefore fundamental to ensure that the systems used, can correctly perform the assessment in cross-language situations. This paper compares two systems used for biometric speaker recognition that both support cross language identification. The first tool is the BatVOX system, made by Agnitio corp. The second system is Nuance Forensics, made by Nuance. Several contradictions concerning language dependence have been seen. In some situations the language match test performs better than the language mismatch test, while this has been seen the other way around as well. In general the Nuance system seems to be slightly better, however nothing can be said about the language dependency of both systems. It is recommended to obtain more data from both languages in order to make a proper comparison

Forensic and Automatic Speaker Recognition System

Current Automatic Speaker Recognition (ASR) System has emerged as an important medium of confirmation of identity in many businesses, ecommerce applications, forensics and law enforcement as well. Specialists trained in criminological recognition can play out this undertaking far superior by looking at an arrangement of acoustic, prosodic, and semantic attributes which has been referred to as structured listening. An algorithmbased system has been developed in the recognition of forensic speakers by physics scientists and forensic linguists to reduce the probability of a contextual bias or pre-centric understanding of a reference model with the validity of an unknown audio sample and any suspicious individual. Many researchers are continuing to develop automatic algorithms in signal processing and machine learning so that improving performance can effectively introduce the speaker’s identity, where the automatic system performs equally with the human audience. In this paper, I examine the literature about the identification of speakers by machines and humans, emphasizing the key technical speaker pattern emerging for the automatic technology in the last decade. I focus on many aspects of automatic speaker recognition (ASR) systems, including speaker-specific features, speaker models, standard assessment data sets, and performance metric