3,631 research outputs found

    Context Trees: Augmenting Geospatial Trajectories with Context

    Get PDF
    Exposing latent knowledge in geospatial trajectories has the potential to provide a better understanding of the movements of individuals and groups. Motivated by such a desire, this work presents the context tree, a new hierarchical data structure that summarises the context behind user actions in a single model. We propose a method for context tree construction that augments geospatial trajectories with land usage data to identify such contexts. Through evaluation of the construction method and analysis of the properties of generated context trees, we demonstrate the foundation for understanding and modelling behaviour afforded. Summarising user contexts into a single data structure gives easy access to information that would otherwise remain latent, providing the basis for better understanding and predicting the actions and behaviours of individuals and groups. Finally, we also present a method for pruning context trees, for use in applications where it is desirable to reduce the size of the tree while retaining useful information

    Towards Urban General Intelligence: A Review and Outlook of Urban Foundation Models

    Full text link
    Machine learning techniques are now integral to the advancement of intelligent urban services, playing a crucial role in elevating the efficiency, sustainability, and livability of urban environments. The recent emergence of foundation models such as ChatGPT marks a revolutionary shift in the fields of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Their unparalleled capabilities in contextual understanding, problem solving, and adaptability across a wide range of tasks suggest that integrating these models into urban domains could have a transformative impact on the development of smart cities. Despite growing interest in Urban Foundation Models~(UFMs), this burgeoning field faces challenges such as a lack of clear definitions, systematic reviews, and universalizable solutions. To this end, this paper first introduces the concept of UFM and discusses the unique challenges involved in building them. We then propose a data-centric taxonomy that categorizes current UFM-related works, based on urban data modalities and types. Furthermore, to foster advancement in this field, we present a promising framework aimed at the prospective realization of UFMs, designed to overcome the identified challenges. Additionally, we explore the application landscape of UFMs, detailing their potential impact in various urban contexts. Relevant papers and open-source resources have been collated and are continuously updated at https://github.com/usail-hkust/Awesome-Urban-Foundation-Models

    Two-level model for land degradation mapping on multispectral satellite imagery

    Get PDF
    Two-level model for land degradation mapping on multispectral satellite imagery of low and medium spatial resolution is shown. First level model applies several different thematic classifications of source multispectral images, e.g. vegetation change, soil erosion etc. Second level gives data fusion of specific thematic classifications of the first level into final thematic map to improve accuracy and reliability of wing to joint interpretation. Proposed model will be useful for information support systems to provide land management

    Context-sensitive interpretation of natural language location descriptions : a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in Information Technology at Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Get PDF
    People frequently describe the locations of objects using natural language. Location descriptions may be either structured, such as 26 Victoria Street, Auckland, or unstructured. Relative location descriptions (e.g., building near Sky Tower) are a common form of unstructured location description, and use qualitative terms to describe the location of one object relative to another (e.g., near, close to, in, next to). Understanding the meaning of these terms is easy for humans, but much more difficult for machines since the terms are inherently vague and context sensitive. In this thesis, we study the semantics (or meaning) of qualitative, geospatial relation terms, specifically geospatial prepositions. Prepositions are one of the most common forms of geospatial relation term, and they are commonly used to describe the location of objects in the geographic (geospatial) environment, such as rivers, mountains, buildings, and towns. A thorough understanding of the semantics of geospatial relation terms is important because it enables more accurate automated georeferencing of text location descriptions than use of place names only. Location descriptions that use geospatial prepositions are found in social media, web sites, blogs, and academic reports, and georeferencing can allow mapping of health, disaster and biological data that is currently inaccessible to the public. Such descriptions have unstructured format, so, their analysis is not straightforward. The specific research questions that we address are: RQ1. Which geospatial prepositions (or groups of prepositions) and senses are semantically similar? RQ2. Is the role of context important in the interpretation of location descriptions? RQ3. Is the object distance associated with geospatial prepositions across a range of geospatial scenes and scales accurately predictable using machine learning methods? RQ4. Is human annotation a reliable form of annotation for the analysis of location descriptions? To address RQ1, we determine the nature and degree of similarity among geospatial prepositions by analysing data collected with a human subjects experiment, using clustering, extensional mapping and t-stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE) plots to form a semantic similarity matrix. In addition to calculating similarity scores among prepositions, we identify the senses of three groups of geospatial prepositions using Venn diagrams, t-sne plots and density-based clustering, and define the relationships between the senses. Furthermore, we use two text mining approaches to identify the degree of similarity among geospatial prepositions: bag of words and GloVe embeddings. By using these methods and further analysis, we identify semantically similar groups of geospatial prepositions including: 1- beside, close to, near, next to, outside and adjacent to; 2- across, over and through and 3- beyond, past, by and off. The prepositions within these groups also share senses. Through is recognised as a specialisation of both across and over. Proximity and adjacency prepositions also have similar senses that express orientation and overlapping relations. Past, off and by share a proximal sense but beyond has a different sense from these, representing on the other side. Another finding is the more frequent use of the preposition close to for pairs of linear objects than near, which is used more frequently for non-linear ones. Also, next to is used to describe proximity more than touching (in contrast to other prepositions like adjacent to). Our application of text mining to identify semantically similar prepositions confirms that a geospatial corpus (NCGL) provides a better representation of the semantics of geospatial prepositions than a general corpus. Also, we found that GloVe embeddings provide adequate semantic similarity measures for more specialised geospatial prepositions, but less so for those that have more generalised applications and multiple senses. We explore the role of context (RQ2) by studying three sites that vary in size, nature, and context in London: Trafalgar Square, Buckingham Palace, and Hyde Park. We use the Google search engine to extract location descriptions that contain these three sites with 9 different geospatial prepositions (in, on, at, next to, close to, adjacent to, near, beside, outside) and calculate their acceptance profiles (the profile of the use of a preposition at different distances from the reference object) and acceptance thresholds (maximum distance from a reference object at which a preposition can acceptably be used). We use these to compare prepositions, and to explore the influence of different contexts. Our results show that near, in and outside are used for larger distances, while beside, adjacent to and at are used for smaller distances. Also, the acceptance threshold for close to is higher than for other proximity/adjacency prepositions such as next to, adjacent to and beside. The acceptance threshold of next to is larger than adjacent to, which confirms the findings in ‎Chapter 2 which identifies next to describing a proximity rather than touching spatial relation. We also found that relatum characteristics such as image schema affect the use of prepositions such as in, on and at. We address RQ3 by developing a machine learning regression model (using the SMOReg algorithm) to predict the distance associated with use of geospatial prepositions in specific expressions. We incorporate a wide range of input variables including the similarity matrix of geospatial prepositions (RQ1); preposition senses; semantic information in the form of embeddings; characteristics of the located and reference objects in the expression including their liquidity/solidity, scale and geometry type and contextual factors such as the density of features of different types in the surrounding area. We evaluate the model on two different datasets with 25% improvement against the best baseline respectively. Finally, we consider the importance of annotation of geospatial location descriptions (RQ4). As annotated data is essential for the successful study of automated interpretation of natural language descriptions, we study the impact and accuracy of human annotation on different geospatial elements. Agreement scores show that human annotators can annotate geospatial relation terms (e.g., geospatial prepositions) with higher agreement than other geospatial elements. This thesis advances understanding of the semantics of geospatial prepositions, particularly considering their semantic similarity and the impact of context on their interpretation. We quantify the semantic similarity of a set of 24 geospatial prepositions; identify senses and the relationships among them for 13 geospatial prepositions; compare the acceptance thresholds of 9 geospatial prepositions and describe the influence of context on them; and demonstrate that richer semantic and contextual information can be incorporated in predictive models to interpret relative geospatial location descriptions more accurately

    Machine Learning Predicts Reach-Scale Channel Types From Coarse-Scale Geospatial Data in a Large River Basin

    Get PDF
    Hydrologic and geomorphic classifications have gained traction in response to the increasing need for basin-wide water resources management. Regardless of the selected classification scheme, an open scientific challenge is how to extend information from limited field sites to classify tens of thousands to millions of channel reaches across a basin. To address this spatial scaling challenge, this study leverages machine learning to predict reach-scale geomorphic channel types using publicly available geospatial data. A bottom-up machine learning approach selects the most accurate and stable model among∼20,000 combinations of 287 coarse geospatial predictors, preprocessing methods, and algorithms in a three-tiered framework to (i) define a tractable problem and reduce predictor noise, (ii) assess model performance in statistical learning, and (iii) assess model performance in prediction. This study also addresses key issues related to the design, interpretation, and diagnosis of machine learning models in hydrologic sciences. In an application to the Sacramento River basin (California, USA), the developed framework selects a Random Forest model to predict 10 channel types previously determined from 290 field surveys over 108,943 two hundred-meter reaches. Performance in statistical learning is reasonable with a 61% median cross-validation accuracy, a sixfold increase over the 10% accuracy of the baseline random model, and the predictions coherently capture the large-scale geomorphic organization of the landscape. Interestingly, in the study area, the persistent roughness of the topography partially controls channel types and the variation in the entropy-based predictive performance is explained by imperfect training information and scale mismatch between labels and predictors

    Beyond data collection: Objectives and methods of research using VGI and geo-social media for disaster management

    Get PDF
    This paper investigates research using VGI and geo-social media in the disaster management context. Relying on the method of systematic mapping, it develops a classification schema that captures three levels of main category, focus, and intended use, and analyzes the relationships with the employed data sources and analysis methods. It focuses the scope to the pioneering field of disaster management, but the described approach and the developed classification schema are easily adaptable to different application domains or future developments. The results show that a hypothesized consolidation of research, characterized through the building of canonical bodies of knowledge and advanced application cases with refined methodology, has not yet happened. The majority of the studies investigate the challenges and potential solutions of data handling, with fewer studies focusing on socio-technological issues or advanced applications. This trend is currently showing no sign of change, highlighting that VGI research is still very much technology-driven as opposed to theory- or application-driven. From the results of the systematic mapping study, the authors formulate and discuss several research objectives for future work, which could lead to a stronger, more theory-driven treatment of the topic VGI in GIScience.Carlos Granell has been partly funded by the Ramón y Cajal Programme (grant number RYC-2014-16913
    corecore