Modeling and Reasoning over Distributed Systems using Aspect-Oriented Graph Grammars

Aspect-orientation is a relatively new paradigm that introduces abstractions to modularize the implementation of system-wide policies. It is based on a composition operation, called aspect weaving, that implicitly modifies a base system by performing related changes within the system modules. Aspect-oriented graph grammars (AOGG) extend the classic graph grammar formalism by defining aspects as sets of rule-based modifications over a base graph grammar. Despite the advantages of aspect-oriented concepts regarding modularity, the implicit nature of the aspect weaving operation may also introduce issues when reasoning about the system behavior. Since in AOGGs aspect weaving is characterized by means of rule-based rewriting, we can overcome these problems by using known analysis techniques from the graph transformation literature to study aspect composition. In this paper, we present a case study of a distributed client-server system with global policies, modeled as an aspect-oriented graph grammar, and discuss how to use the AGG tool to identify potential conflicts in aspect weaving

On the structure of context-sensitive grammars

Context sensitive grammar and generation of noncontext free language

Normalisation Control in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows

We introduce `atomic flows': they are graphs obtained from derivations by tracing atom occurrences and forgetting the logical structure. We study simple manipulations of atomic flows that correspond to complex reductions on derivations. This allows us to prove, for propositional logic, a new and very general normalisation theorem, which contains cut elimination as a special case. We operate in deep inference, which is more general than other syntactic paradigms, and where normalisation is more difficult to control. We argue that atomic flows are a significant technical advance for normalisation theory, because 1) the technique they support is largely independent of syntax; 2) indeed, it is largely independent of logical inference rules; 3) they constitute a powerful geometric formalism, which is more intuitive than syntax

Key Substitution in the Symbolic Analysis of Cryptographic Protocols (extended version)

Key substitution vulnerable signature schemes are signature schemes that permit an intruder, given a public verification key and a signed message, to compute a pair of signature and verification keys such that the message appears to be signed with the new signature key. A digital signature scheme is said to be vulnerable to destructive exclusive ownership property (DEO) If it is computationaly feasible for an intruder, given a public verification key and a pair of message and its valid signature relatively to the given public key, to compute a pair of signature and verification keys and a new message such that the given signature appears to be valid for the new message relatively to the new verification key. In this paper, we prove decidability of the insecurity problem of cryptographic protocols where the signature schemes employed in the concrete realisation have this two properties

Tree transducers, L systems, and two-way machines

A relationship between parallel rewriting systems and two-way machines is investigated. Restrictions on the “copying power” of these devices endow them with rich structuring and give insight into the issues of determinism, parallelism, and copying. Among the parallel rewriting systems considered are the top-down tree transducer; the generalized syntax-directed translation scheme and the ETOL system, and among the two-way machines are the tree-walking automaton, the two-way finite-state transducer, and (generalizations of) the one-way checking stack automaton. The. relationship of these devices to macro grammars is also considered. An effort is made .to provide a systematic survey of a number of existing results

Generic Strategies for Chemical Space Exploration

Computational approaches to exploring "chemical universes", i.e., very large sets, potentially infinite sets of compounds that can be constructed by a prescribed collection of reaction mechanisms, in practice suffer from a combinatorial explosion. It quickly becomes impossible to test, for all pairs of compounds in a rapidly growing network, whether they can react with each other. More sophisticated and efficient strategies are therefore required to construct very large chemical reaction networks. Undirected labeled graphs and graph rewriting are natural models of chemical compounds and chemical reactions. Borrowing the idea of partial evaluation from functional programming, we introduce partial applications of rewrite rules. Binding substrate to rules increases the number of rules but drastically prunes the substrate sets to which it might match, resulting in dramatically reduced resource requirements. At the same time, exploration strategies can be guided, e.g. based on restrictions on the product molecules to avoid the explicit enumeration of very unlikely compounds. To this end we introduce here a generic framework for the specification of exploration strategies in graph-rewriting systems. Using key examples of complex chemical networks from sugar chemistry and the realm of metabolic networks we demonstrate the feasibility of a high-level strategy framework. The ideas presented here can not only be used for a strategy-based chemical space exploration that has close correspondence of experimental results, but are much more general. In particular, the framework can be used to emulate higher-level transformation models such as illustrated in a small puzzle game