13,481 research outputs found
Machine learning to analyze single-case data : a proof of concept
Visual analysis is the most commonly used method for interpreting data from singlecase designs, but levels of interrater agreement remain a concern. Although structured
aids to visual analysis such as the dual-criteria (DC) method may increase interrater
agreement, the accuracy of the analyses may still benefit from improvements. Thus, the
purpose of our study was to (a) examine correspondence between visual analysis and
models derived from different machine learning algorithms, and (b) compare the
accuracy, Type I error rate and power of each of our models with those produced by
the DC method. We trained our models on a previously published dataset and then
conducted analyses on both nonsimulated and simulated graphs. All our models
derived from machine learning algorithms matched the interpretation of the visual
analysts more frequently than the DC method. Furthermore, the machine learning
algorithms outperformed the DC method on accuracy, Type I error rate, and power.
Our results support the somewhat unorthodox proposition that behavior analysts may
use machine learning algorithms to supplement their visual analysis of single-case data,
but more research is needed to examine the potential benefits and drawbacks of such an
approach
Can k-NN imputation improve the performance of C4.5 with small software project data sets? A comparative evaluation
Missing data is a widespread problem that can affect the ability to use data to construct effective prediction systems. We investigate a common machine learning technique that can tolerate missing values, namely C4.5, to predict cost using six real world software project databases. We analyze the predictive performance after using the k-NN missing data imputation technique to see if it is better to tolerate missing data or to try to impute missing values and then apply the C4.5 algorithm. For the investigation, we simulated three missingness mechanisms, three missing data patterns, and five missing data percentages. We found that the k-NN imputation can improve the prediction accuracy of C4.5. At the same time, both C4.5 and k-NN are little affected by the missingness mechanism, but that the missing data pattern and the missing data percentage have a strong negative impact upon prediction (or imputation) accuracy particularly if the missing data percentage exceeds 40%
Recommended from our members
Inference of single-cell phylogenies from lineage tracing data using Cassiopeia.
The pairing of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing with massively parallel single-cell readouts now enables large-scale lineage tracing. However, the rapid growth in complexity of data from these assays has outpaced our ability to accurately infer phylogenetic relationships. First, we introduce Cassiopeia-a suite of scalable maximum parsimony approaches for tree reconstruction. Second, we provide a simulation framework for evaluating algorithms and exploring lineage tracer design principles. Finally, we generate the most complex experimental lineage tracing dataset to date, 34,557 human cells continuously traced over 15 generations, and use it for benchmarking phylogenetic inference approaches. We show that Cassiopeia outperforms traditional methods by several metrics and under a wide variety of parameter regimes, and provide insight into the principles for the design of improved Cas9-enabled recorders. Together, these should broadly enable large-scale mammalian lineage tracing efforts. Cassiopeia and its benchmarking resources are publicly available at www.github.com/YosefLab/Cassiopeia
- âŠ