7 research outputs found

    ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์œ ๊ธฐ๋žญํ‚จ์‚ฌ์ดํด์˜ ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ด์›๋ณด.์šด์ „ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์—ด์—ญํ•™ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์ธก์ • ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์— ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์œ ๊ธฐ ๋žญํ‚จ ์‚ฌ์ดํด(ORC)์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์œ ๊ธฐ ๋žญํ‚จ ์‚ฌ์ดํด ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์•ž์„œ, ์•กํ™” ์ฒœ์—ฐ๊ฐ€์Šค(LNG)๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋ƒ‰์—ด์„ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋‹ค์„ฑ๋ถ„ ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ORC ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋‹ค๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ORC๋กœ, ๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์•กํ™”๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์—‘์„œ์ง€ ์†์‹ค์„ ์ตœ์†Œ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ„์œจ๊ณผ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ์•กํ™”๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์—‘์„œ์ง€ ์†์งˆ์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์  ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•œ ํ›„์— ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ORC์˜ ํšจ์œจ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ORC ์œ ๋‹›๋“ค์˜ ์šด์ „ ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํšจ์œจ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ์—ด์›์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ณต์ • ํšจ์œจ์˜ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์„น์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์šด์ „ ์ค‘ ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์กฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ORC ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ORC์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์ด ํ‰๊ท ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋‹ค. ORC์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์šด์ „์— ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋“ค(์—ด๊ตํ™˜๊ธฐ ๋‚ด์˜ ์ตœ์†Œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์˜จ๋„ ์ฐจ ์œ„๋ฐ˜๊ณผ ํŒฝ์ฐฝ๊ธฐ ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์•ก์ฒด๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ)์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๋ชฉ์  ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํŒจ๋„ํ‹ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ๋“ค์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์—๋Š” ๋‘ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„ , ๋…ธ๋ฏธ๋‚  ์šด์ „ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ ORC ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ด๊ตํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ์–ป๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์—ด๊ตํ™˜๊ธฐ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ๊ณ ์ •ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋…ธ๋ฏธ๋‚  ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ ๋‹ค์‹œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋…ธ๋ฏธ๋‚  ์šด์ „ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชฉ์  ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์–ป๋Š”๋‹ค. ์กฐ์„ฑ์€ ๋…ธ๋ฏธ๋‚  ๊ฐ’์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋•Œ ์กฐ์„ฑ์ด ์„ ํƒ๋  ํ™•๋ฅ ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฒ”์œ„์—์„œ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ORC ์ถœ๋ ฅ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๊ฐ’์„ ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Polynomial Chaos Expansion(PCE) with sparse grid quadrature๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ž‘์€ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ผ๋„ ORC์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์šด์ „์— ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ์•Œ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ์šด์ „์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ORC๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์— ๋”ํ•ด ์—ด์›์˜ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ์—ด์—ญํ•™ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์—๋„ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ „ ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ์กฐ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‘”๊ฐํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ์ž‘๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ์ž„๊ณ„ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ์ž„๊ณ„ ์••๋ ฅ์— ์ธก์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์‹œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์—ด์›์˜ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋…ธ๋ฏธ๋‚  ๊ฐ’์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ ORC ์šด์ „์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด 9๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์—ด์—ญํ•™ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ํ˜น์€ ๋””์ž์ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ด์ „ ์„น์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ๋ฌด๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ PCE์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํ‰๊ท ๊ณผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์„ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ(analytically) ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•ด์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์—ด์—ญํ•™ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋””์ž์ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‰๊ท ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ORC๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.A method to design the optimal working fluid mixture of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC), which is operationally flexible and robust against measurement error in thermodynamic parameters, has been developed. Prior to design robust ORC, an optimal design of ORC for utilizing Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as heat sink of which evaporation process is not isothermal is proposed to represent a design procedure to extract as much energy as possible from a multicomponent heat sink without consideration of robustness. The proposed system adopts binary working fluids for each stage to minimize the exergy destroyed in the condensers of each stage of the cycle. The best combination of working fluids was selected through minimization of the amount of destroyed exergy by varying the flow rate, composition, and pressure of the working fluid. After selecting the working fluids, process optimization was performed through a parametric study. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to observe the effect of temperature variation of the heat sources in the range of 25 - 85 โ„ƒ on the net power generation. At the following section, a systematic method to design a robust ORC using LNG and multicomponent working fluid, which yields maximum power output even when the composition of the working fluid varies from the nominal point during operation of ORC has been developed. The proposed method seeks the optimal composition giving both the maximum mean of ORC power output. To suppress the factors that adversely affect the operation of ORC (violation of minimum temperature difference in heat exchanger and formation of liquid droplet in expander), the objective function is penalized when they occur. The procedure to derive the statistical moments consists of two steps. Initially, the required heat exchanger area is obtained by simulation of ORC model with a nominal operating conditions (composition, pump discharge pressure, and expander discharge pressure). At the next step, the simulation is carried out again with the obtained area and the varying composition. The mass fraction of each substance in the working fluid is assumed to follow uniform distribution centered at the nominal point. To obtain the mean and variance with a small number of simulations, Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) with sparse grid quadrature is employed. It has been shown that small changes in composition can have serious consequences for stable operation of ORC, and the design of working fluid by the proposed method allows flexible ORC operation despite the existence of uncertainty in the composition. Finally, the optimization takes into account uncertainties in thermodynamic parameters and heat source in addition to composition. Using the selected working fluid which was turned out to be the most insensitive from the uncertainty of composition, optimization is carried out again when the critical temperature and pressure of each substance composing the working fluid varies within its measurement uncertainty, which can be found in the literature. Also, the temperature of the heat source varies from the nominal design point to enhance the operational flexibility of ORC. In sum, the design of ORC was performed assuming a total of the nine parameters or design variables with uncertainty, which requires excessive amount of computation with the method suggested in the previous section. Therefore, the optimization using a surrogate model was devised to efficiently find the optimal and robust ORC design. Because the proposed surrogate model is constructed based on PCE, the statistical moments can be derived analytically, which leads to reduce the time for optimization drastically. Comparing the ORC design, which was taken with more uncertainty, to the design obtained in the previous section, the former design showed the highest output even when the parameters and design variables were changing from the nominal point.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Thesis outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.3 Conventional ORC configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Design and optimization of cascade organic Rankine cycle for recovering cryogenic energy from liquefied natural gas using binary working fluid 10 2.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2 Description of the proposed cascade organic Rankine cycle . . . . . . 14 2.3 Simulation and optimization of power generation cycle . . . . . . . . 21 2.3.1 LNG cold exergy recovery part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.3.2 Recuperation part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4 Simulation and optimization results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.4.1 Result for LNG cold exergy recovery part . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.5 Working fluid selection and process optimization result for recuperation part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2.6 Energy and exergy analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 2.7 Sensitivity analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.8 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3 Robust design of multicomponent working fluid for organic Rankine cycle - consideration on operational uncertainty 52 3.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.1.1 Evaluation of the objective function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.1.2 Polynomial chaos expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.2 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.2.1 ORC with LNG heat sink using ternary working fluid . . . . . 71 3.2.2 Precision test for PCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 3.2.3 Influence of penalty function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 3.2.4 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96Docto

    Efficient uncertainty quantification in aerospace analysis and design

    Get PDF
    The main purpose of this study is to apply a computationally efficient uncertainty quantification approach, Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos (NIPC) based stochastic expansions, to robust aerospace analysis and design under mixed (aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties and demonstrate this technique on model problems and robust aerodynamic optimization. The proposed optimization approach utilizes stochastic response surfaces obtained with NIPC methods to approximate the objective function and the constraints in the optimization formulation. The objective function includes the stochastic measures which are minimized simultaneously to ensure the robustness of the final design to both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. For model problems with mixed uncertainties, Quadrature-Based and Point-Collocation NIPC methods were used to create the response surfaces used in the optimization process. For the robust airfoil optimization under aleatory (Mach number) and epistemic (turbulence model) uncertainties, a combined Point-Collocation NIPC approach was utilized to create the response surfaces used as the surrogates in the optimization process. Two stochastic optimization formulations were studied: optimization under pure aleatory uncertainty and optimization under mixed uncertainty. As shown in this work for various problems, the NIPC method is computationally more efficient than Monte Carlo methods for moderate number of uncertain variables and can give highly accurate estimation of various metrics used in robust design optimization under mixed uncertainties. This study also introduces a new adaptive sampling approach to refine the Point-Collocation NIPC method for further improvement of the computational efficiency. Two numerical problems demonstrated that the adaptive approach can produce the same accuracy level of the response surface obtained with oversampling ratio of 2 using less function evaluations. --Abstract, page iii

    Iterative learning control of crystallisation systems

    Get PDF
    Under the increasing pressure of issues like reducing the time to market, managing lower production costs, and improving the flexibility of operation, batch process industries thrive towards the production of high value added commodity, i.e. specialty chemicals, pharmaceuticals, agricultural, and biotechnology enabled products. For better design, consistent operation and improved control of batch chemical processes one cannot ignore the sensing and computational blessings provided by modern sensors, computers, algorithms, and software. In addition, there is a growing demand for modelling and control tools based on process operating data. This study is focused on developing process operation data-based iterative learning control (ILC) strategies for batch processes, more specifically for batch crystallisation systems. In order to proceed, the research took a step backward to explore the existing control strategies, fundamentals, mechanisms, and various process analytical technology (PAT) tools used in batch crystallisation control. From the basics of the background study, an operating data-driven ILC approach was developed to improve the product quality from batch-to-batch. The concept of ILC is to exploit the repetitive nature of batch processes to automate recipe updating using process knowledge obtained from previous runs. The methodology stated here was based on the linear time varying (LTV) perturbation model in an ILC framework to provide a convergent batch-to-batch improvement of the process performance indicator. In an attempt to create uniqueness in the research, a novel hierarchical ILC (HILC) scheme was proposed for the systematic design of the supersaturation control (SSC) of a seeded batch cooling crystalliser. This model free control approach is implemented in a hierarchical structure by assigning data-driven supersaturation controller on the upper level and a simple temperature controller in the lower level. In order to familiarise with other data based control of crystallisation processes, the study rehearsed the existing direct nucleation control (DNC) approach. However, this part was more committed to perform a detailed strategic investigation of different possible structures of DNC and to compare the results with that of a first principle model based optimisation for the very first time. The DNC results in fact outperformed the model based optimisation approach and established an ultimate guideline to select the preferable DNC structure. Batch chemical processes are distributed as well as nonlinear in nature which need to be operated over a wide range of operating conditions and often near the boundary of the admissible region. As the linear lumped model predictive controllers (MPCs) often subject to severe performance limitations, there is a growing demand of simple data driven nonlinear control strategy to control batch crystallisers that will consider the spatio-temporal aspects. In this study, an operating data-driven polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) based nonlinear surrogate modelling and optimisation strategy was presented for batch crystallisation processes. Model validation and optimisation results confirmed this approach as a promise to nonlinear control. The evaluations of the proposed data based methodologies were carried out by simulation case studies, laboratory experiments and industrial pilot plant experiments. For all the simulation case studies a detailed mathematical models covering reaction kinetics and heat mass balances were developed for a batch cooling crystallisation system of Paracetamol in water. Based on these models, rigorous simulation programs were developed in MATLABยฎ, which was then treated as the real batch cooling crystallisation system. The laboratory experimental works were carried out using a lab scale system of Paracetamol and iso-Propyl alcohol (IPA). All the experimental works including the qualitative and quantitative monitoring of the crystallisation experiments and products demonstrated an inclusive application of various in situ process analytical technology (PAT) tools, such as focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM), UV/Vis spectroscopy and particle vision measurement (PVM) as well. The industrial pilot scale study was carried out in GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited, Bangladesh, and the system of experiments was Paracetamol and other powdered excipients used to make paracetamol tablets. The methodologies presented in this thesis provide a comprehensive framework for data-based dynamic optimisation and control of crystallisation processes. All the simulation and experimental evaluations of the proposed approaches emphasised the potential of the data-driven techniques to provide considerable advances in the current state-of-the-art in crystallisation control

    Sensitivity study of dynamic systems using polynomial chaos

    No full text
    International audienceGlobal sensitivity has mainly been analyzed in static models, though most physical systems can be described by differential equations. Very few approaches have been proposed for the sensitivity of dynamic models and the only ones are local. Nevertheless, it would be of great interest to consider the entire uncertainty range of parameters since they can vary within large intervals depending on their meaning. Other advantage of global analysis is that the sensitivity indices of a given parameter are evaluated while all the other parameters can be varied. In this way, the relative variability of each parameter is taken into account, revealing any possible interactions. This paper presents the global sensitivity analysis for dynamic models with an original approach based on the polynomial chaos (PC) expansion of the output. The evaluation of the PC expansion of the output is less expensive compared to direct simulations. Moreover, at each time instant, the coefficients of the PC decomposition convey the parameter sensitivity and then a sensitivity function can be obtained. The PC coefficients are determined using non-intrusive methods. The proposed approach is illustrated with some well-known dynamic systems

    Vehicle parameter sensitivity with polynomial chaos

    Get PDF
    [ES] Es de gran interรฉs analizar la sensibilidad de los parรกmetros de modelos matemรกticos que describen sistemas fรญsicos, y merece una atenciรณn particular estudiar esta sensibilidad en modelos con incertidumbre en el valor de sus parรกmetros. La llamada sensibilidad global considera todo el intervalo de incertidumbre de los parรกmetros al considerarlos variables aleatorias. Este trabajo presenta el anรกlisis de sensibilidad global en frecuencia del modelo matemรกtico paramรฉtrico de la dinรกmica lateral de un modelo de automรณvil, con un enfoque basado en la expansiรณn de la respuesta del modelo con polinomios de caos. Esta tรฉcnica permite representar fรกcilmente el sistema como un modelo estocรกstico, donde los parรกmetros pasan a ser variables aleatorias que varรญan de acuerdo a su incertidumbre. El modelo estocรกstico debe ser una aproximaciรณn muy cercana del modelo original.[EN] It is interesting to analyze the parameter sensitivity of mathematical models that describe physical systems, and it deserves particular attention the sensitivity study of models with uncertainty in the parameter values. Global sensitivity takes into account the entire range of parameter uncertainty because it considers the parameters as random variables. This paper presents the global sensitivity analysis in frequency of a parametric mathematical model of lateral dynamics of a vehicle model, with an approach based on the polynomial chaos expansion of the model response. This technique allows to easily represent the system as a stochastic model, where the parameters become random variables that vary according to their uncertainty. The stochastic model should be a very close approximation of the original model.Haro, E.; Acebedo, M.; Velรกzquez, R. (2015). Sensibilidad paramรฉtrica de un automรณvil con polinomios de caos. Revista Iberoamericana de Automรกtica e Informรกtica industrial. 12(3):253-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riai.2015.04.001OJS253259123Crestaux, T., Le Maฤฑห†tre, O., & Martinez, J.-M. (2009). Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(7), 1161-1172. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.008Cukier, R. ., Levine, H. ., & Shuler, K. . (1978). Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 26(1), 1-42. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-9Field, R., 2002. Numerical methods to estimate the coefficients of the polynomial chaos expansion. En: 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference.Ghanem, R., & Red-Horse, J. (1999). Propagation of probabilistic uncertainty in complex physical systems using a stochastic finite element approach. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 133(1-4), 137-144. doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(99)00102-5Sandoval, E. H. (2008). Estimaciรณn de los parรกmetros fรญsicos de un automรณvil. Revista Iberoamericana de Automรกtica e Informรกtica Industrial RIAI, 5(4), 28-35. doi:10.1016/s1697-7912(08)70174-2Haro Sandoval, E., Anstett-Collin, F., & Basset, M. (2012). Sensitivity study of dynamic systems using polynomial chaos. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 104, 15-26. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.001Homma, T., & Saltelli, A. (1996). Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 52(1), 1-17. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6Jacques, J., Lavergne, C., & Devictor, N. (2006). Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(10-11), 1126-1134. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.047Mara, T. A., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Application of global sensitivity analysis of model output to building thermal simulations. Building Simulation, 1(4), 290-302. doi:10.1007/s12273-008-8129-5McKay, M. D., Morrison, J. D., & Upton, S. C. (1999). Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models. Computer Physics Communications, 117(1-2), 44-51. doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00155-6Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & Chan, K. P.-S. (1999). A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. Technometrics, 41(1), 39-56. doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594Sudret, B. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(7), 964-979. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002Turyani, T., Rabitz, H., 2000. Local methods in sensitivity analysis. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, E. M. Scott, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Wiener, N. (1938). The Homogeneous Chaos. American Journal of Mathematics, 60(4), 897. doi:10.2307/2371268Witteveen, J., Bijl, H., 2006. Modeling arbitrary uncertainties using Gram-Schmidt polynomial chaos. En: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.Xiu, D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2003). Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. Journal of Computational Physics, 187(1), 137-167. doi:10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00092-
    corecore