A Benchmarking Analysis of Electricity Distribution Utilities in Switzerland

This paper studies the sensitivity problems of the benchmarking methods used in the regulation practice. Three commonly used methods have been applied to a sample of 52 electricity distribution utilities to estimate their cost efficiency. These methods include stochastic frontier, corrected ordinary least squares and data envelopment analysis. The results indicate that both efficiency scores and ranks are significantly different across various models. Especially considerable differences exist between parametric and non-parametric methods.

On testing equality of distributions of technical efficiency scores

The challenge of the econometric problem in production efficiency analysis is that the very efficiency scores to be analyzed are unobserved. Recently, statistical properties have been discovered for a class of estimators popular in the literature, known as data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. This opens a wide range of possibilities for a well-grounded statistical inference about the true efficiency scores from their DEA-estimates. In this paper we investigate possibility of using existing tests for equality of two distributions for such a context. Considering statistical complications pertinent to our context, we consider several approaches to adapt the Li (1996) test to the context and explore their performance in terms of the size and the power of the test in various Monte Carlo experiments. One of these approaches showed good performance both in the size and in the power, thus encouraging for its wide use in empirical studies.Kernel Density Estimation and Tests, Bootstrap, DEA

Developing a combined quantitative benchmarking system for the performance of local health authorities: The case of the Tuscany Region in Italy

This paper proposes an integrated quantitative benchmarking approach for the measurement of the performance of Local Health Authorities (LHAs). It is based on a sound balanced scorecard approach developed and implemented in the Tuscany Region by the Management and Health Laboratory of Sant’Anna School combined with a bias corrected measure of technical efficiency, estimated using a bootstrap based Data Envelopment Analysis. The empirical results show that the typical LHA in Tuscany experienced 14% bias-corrected inefficiency in 2007. Using correlation analysis and mapping quadrants, the paper shows the relationships among technical efficiency and quality and appropriateness as well as analyses the impact of organizational factors on the performance of LHAs. Finally, this combined benchmarking approach is illustrated as a useful and important managerial tool both for regional and local authorities.appropriateness, bias correction, data envelopment analysis, local health authorities, performance evaluation system

COOPER-framework: A Unified Standard Process for Non-parametric Projects

Practitioners assess performance of entities in increasingly large and complicated datasets. If non-parametric models, such as Data Envelopment Analysis, were ever considered as simple push-button technologies, this is impossible when many variables are available or when data have to be compiled from several sources. This paper introduces by the ‘COOPER-framework’ a comprehensive model for carrying out non-parametric projects. The framework consists of six interrelated phases: Concepts and objectives, On structuring data, Operational models, Performance comparison model, Evaluation, and Result and deployment. Each of the phases describes some necessary steps a researcher should examine for a well defined and repeatable analysis. The COOPER-framework provides for the novice analyst guidance, structure and advice for a sound non-parametric analysis. The more experienced analyst benefits from a check list such that important issues are not forgotten. In addition, by the use of a standardized framework non-parametric assessments will be more reliable, more repeatable, more manageable, faster and less costly.DEA, non-parametric efficiency, unified standard process, COOPER-framework.

Some Determinants of Intermediate Local Governments' Spending Efficiency: The Case of French Départements

Efforts undertaken by France to restructure the allocation of governmental competencies increased the importance of subnational governments by transferring additional tasks. This paper analyzes the efficiency of public spending on an intermediate government level for a sample of 96 départements in metropolitan France in 2008. Spending efficiency is measured using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Results indicate significant room for improvements and detect spending inefficiencies averaging between 10 and 22 percent, depending on model specification. To explain efficiency, a bootstrapped truncated regression, following Simar and Wilson (2007), is applied. The second-stage regression shows that efficiency is also determined by exogenous factors and identifies the distance to the national capital, inhabitants' income and the share of inhabitants of an age over 65 as significant determinants of efficiency.Intermediate government spending efficiency, nonparametric efficiency analysis, bootstrapped truncated regression

Does Farm Size and Specialization Matter for Productive Efficiency? Results from Kansas

In this article, we used bootstrap data envelopment analysis techniques to examine technical and scale efficiency scores for a balanced panel of 564 farms in Kansas for the period 1993–2007. The production technology is estimated under three different assumptions of returns to scale and the results are compared. Technical and scale efficiency is disaggregated by farm size and specialization. Our results suggest that farms are both scale and technically inefficient. On average, technical efficiency has deteriorated over the sample period. Technical efficiency varies directly by farm size and the differences are significant. Differences across farm specializations are not significant.bootstrap, data envelopment analysis, efficiency, farms, Farm Management, Production Economics, D24, Q12,

Robust DEA efficiency scores: A probabilistic/combinatorial approach

In this paper we propose robust efficiency scores for the scenario in which the specification of the inputs/outputs to be included in the DEA model is modelled with a probability distribution. This proba- bilistic approach allows us to obtain three different robust efficiency scores: the Conditional Expected Score, the Unconditional Expected Score and the Expected score under the assumption of Maximum Entropy principle. The calculation of the three efficiency scores involves the resolution of an exponential number of linear problems. The algorithm presented in this paper allows to solve over 200 millions of linear problems in an affordable time when considering up 20 inputs/outputs and 200 DMUs. The approach proposed is illustrated with an application to the assessment of professional tennis players

Clustering in a Data Envelopment Analysis Using Bootstrapped Efficiency Scores

This paper explores the insight from the application of cluster analysis to the results of a Data Envelopment Analysis of productive behaviour. Cluster analysis involves the identification of groups among a set of different objects (individuals or characteristics). This is done via the definitions of a distance matrix that defines the relationship between the different objects, which then allows the determination of which objects are most similar into clusters. In the case of DEA, cluster analysis methods can be used to determine the degree of sensitivity of the efficiency score for a particular DMU to the presence of the other DMUs in the sample that make up the reference technology to that DMU. Using the bootstrapped values of the efficiency measures we construct two types of distance matrices. One is defined as a function of the variance covariance matrix of the scores with respect to each other. This implies that the covariance of the score of one DMU is used as a measure of the degree to which the efficiency measure for a single DMU is influenced by the efficiency level of another. An alternative distance measure is defined as a function of the ranks of the bootstrapped efficiency. An example is provided using both measures as the clustering distance for both a one input one output case and a two input two output case.

Efficiency and Performance in the Gas Industry

Efficiency Performance Gas Industry