Improving security of lightweith SHA-3 against preimage attacks

In this article we describe the SHA-3 algorithm and its internal permutation in which potential weaknesses are hidden.  The hash algorithm can be used for different purposes, such as pseudo-random bit sequences generator, key wrapping or one pass authentication, especially in weak devices (WSN, IoT, etc.). Analysis of the function showed that successful preimage attacks are possible for low round hashes, protection from which only works with increasing the number of rounds inside the function. When the hash function is used for building lightweight applications, it is necessary to apply a small number of rounds, which requires additional security measures. This article proposes a variant improved hash function protecting against preimage attacks, which occur on SHA-3. We suggest using an additional external randomness sources obtained from a lightweight PRNG or from application of the source data permutation

Comparison of hash function algorithms against attacks: a review

Hash functions are considered key components of nearly all cryptographic protocols, as well as of many security applications such as message authentication codes, data integrity, password storage, and random number generation. Many hash function algorithms have been proposed in order to ensure authentication and integrity of the data, including MD5, SHA-1, SHA-2, SHA-3 and RIPEMD. This paper involves an overview of these standard algorithms, and also provides a focus on their limitations against common attacks. These study shows that these standard hash function algorithms suffer collision attacks and time inefficiency. Other types of hash functions are also highlighted in comparison with the standard hash function algorithm in performing the resistance against common attacks. It shows that these algorithms are still weak to resist against collision attacks

Preimages for SHA-1

This research explores the problem of finding a preimage — an input that, when passed through a particular function, will result in a pre-specified output — for the compression function of the SHA-1 cryptographic hash. This problem is much more difficult than the problem of finding a collision for a hash function, and preimage attacks for very few popular hash functions are known. The research begins by introducing the field and giving an overview of the existing work in the area. A thorough analysis of the compression function is made, resulting in alternative formulations for both parts of the function, and both statistical and theoretical tools to determine the difficulty of the SHA-1 preimage problem. Different representations (And- Inverter Graph, Binary Decision Diagram, Conjunctive Normal Form, Constraint Satisfaction form, and Disjunctive Normal Form) and associated tools to manipulate and/or analyse these representations are then applied and explored, and results are collected and interpreted. In conclusion, the SHA-1 preimage problem remains unsolved and insoluble for the foreseeable future. The primary issue is one of efficient representation; despite a promising theoretical difficulty, both the diffusion characteristics and the depth of the tree stand in the way of efficient search. Despite this, the research served to confirm and quantify the difficulty of the problem both theoretically, using Schaefer's Theorem, and practically, in the context of different representations

Inverting Cryptographic Hash Functions via Cube-and-Conquer

MD4 and MD5 are seminal cryptographic hash functions proposed in early 1990s. MD4 consists of 48 steps and produces a 128-bit hash given a message of arbitrary finite size. MD5 is a more secure 64-step extension of MD4. Both MD4 and MD5 are vulnerable to practical collision attacks, yet it is still not realistic to invert them, i.e. to find a message given a hash. In 2007, the 39-step version of MD4 was inverted via reducing to SAT and applying a CDCL solver along with the so-called Dobbertin's constraints. As for MD5, in 2012 its 28-step version was inverted via a CDCL solver for one specified hash without adding any additional constraints. In this study, Cube-and-Conquer (a combination of CDCL and lookahead) is applied to invert step-reduced versions of MD4 and MD5. For this purpose, two algorithms are proposed. The first one generates inversion problems for MD4 by gradually modifying the Dobbertin's constraints. The second algorithm tries the cubing phase of Cube-and-Conquer with different cutoff thresholds to find the one with minimal runtime estimation of the conquer phase. This algorithm operates in two modes: (i) estimating the hardness of a given propositional Boolean formula; (ii) incomplete SAT-solving of a given satisfiable propositional Boolean formula. While the first algorithm is focused on inverting step-reduced MD4, the second one is not area-specific and so is applicable to a variety of classes of hard SAT instances. In this study, 40-, 41-, 42-, and 43-step MD4 are inverted for the first time via the first algorithm and the estimating mode of the second algorithm. 28-step MD5 is inverted for four hashes via the incomplete SAT-solving mode of the second algorithm. For three hashes out of them this is done for the first time.Comment: 40 pages, 11 figures. A revised submission to JAI

MOIM: a novel design of cryptographic hash function

A hash function usually has two main components: a compression function or permutation function and mode of operation. In this paper, we propose a new concrete novel design of a permutation based hash functions called MOIM. MOIM is based on concatenating two parallel fast wide pipe constructions as a mode of operation designed by Nandi and Paul, and presented at Indocrypt 2010 where the size of the internal state is significantly larger than the size of the output. And the permutations functions used in MOIM are inspired from the SHA-3 finalist Grøstl hash function which is originally inspired from Rijndael design (AES). As a consequence there is a very strong confusion and diffusion in MOIM. Also, we show that MOIM resists all the generic attacks and Joux attack in two defense security levels