Removing Algebraic Data Types from Constrained Horn Clauses Using Difference Predicates

We address the problem of proving the satisfiability of Constrained Horn Clauses (CHCs) with Algebraic Data Types (ADTs), such as lists and trees. We propose a new technique for transforming CHCs with ADTs into CHCs where predicates are defined over basic types, such as integers and booleans, only. Thus, our technique avoids the explicit use of inductive proof rules during satisfiability proofs. The main extension over previous techniques for ADT removal is a new transformation rule, called differential replacement, which allows us to introduce auxiliary predicates corresponding to the lemmas that are often needed when making inductive proofs. We present an algorithm that uses the new rule, together with the traditional folding/unfolding transformation rules, for the automatic removal of ADTs. We prove that if the set of the transformed clauses is satisfiable, then so is the set of the original clauses. By an experimental evaluation, we show that the use of the differential replacement rule significantly improves the effectiveness of ADT removal, and we show that our transformation-based approach is competitive with respect to a well-established technique that extends the CVC4 solver with induction.Comment: 10th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2020) - version with appendix; added DOI of the final authenticated Springer publication; minor correction

Contract Strengthening through Constrained Horn Clause Verification

The functional properties of a program are often specified by providing a contract for each of its functions. A contract of a function consists of a pair of formulas, called a precondition and a postcondition, which, respectively, should hold before and after execution of that function. It might be the case that the contracts supplied by the programmer are not adequate to allow a verification system to prove program correctness, that is, to show that for every function, if the precondition holds and the execution of the function terminates, then the postcondition holds. We address this problem by providing a technique which may strengthen the postconditions of the functions, thereby improving the ability of the verifier to show program correctness. Our technique consists of four steps. First, the translation of the given program, which may manipulate algebraic data structures (ADTs), and its contracts into a set of constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) whose satisfiability implies the validity of the given contracts. Then, the derivation, via CHC transformation performed by the VeriCaT tool, of a new set of CHCs that manipulate only basic sorts (such as booleans or integers) and whose satisfiability implies the satisfiability of the original set of clauses. Then, the construction of a model, if any, of the new, derived CHCs using the CHC solver SPACER for basic sorts. Finally, the translation of that model into the formulas that suitably strengthen the postconditions of the given contracts. We will present our technique through an example consisting of a Scala program for reversing lists. Note that the Stainless verifier is not able to prove the correctness of that program when considering the given contracts, while it succeeds when considering the contracts with the strengthened postconditions constructed by applying our technique.Comment: In Proceedings HCVS/VPT 2022, arXiv:2211.1067

Automata-Based Verification of Relational Properties of Functions over Algebraic Data Structures

This paper is concerned with automatically proving properties about the input-output relation of functional programs operating over algebraic data types. Recent results show how to approximate the image of a functional program using a regular tree language. Though expressive, those techniques cannot prove properties relating the input and the output of a function, e.g., proving that the output of a function reversing a list has the same length as the input list. In this paper, we built upon those results and define a procedure to compute or over-approximate such a relation. Instead of representing the image of a function by a regular set of terms, we represent (an approximation of) the input-output relation by a regular set of tuples of terms. Regular languages of tuples of terms are recognized using a tree automaton recognizing convolutions of terms, where a convolution transforms a tuple of terms into a term built on tuples of symbols. Both the program and the properties are transformed into predicates and Constrained Horn clauses (CHCs). Then, using an Implication Counter Example procedure (ICE), we infer a model of the clauses, associating to each predicate a regular relation. In this ICE procedure, checking if a given model satisfies the clauses is undecidable in general. We overcome undecidability by proposing an incomplete but sound inference procedure for such relational regular properties. Though the procedure is incomplete, its implementation performs well on 120 examples. It efficiently proves non-trivial relational properties or finds counter-examples

Temporal reasoning in a logic programming language with modularity

Actualmente os Sistemas de Informação Organizacionais (SIO) lidam cada vez mais com informação que tem dependências temporais. Neste trabalho concebemos um ambiente de trabalho para construir e manter SIO Temporais. Este ambiente assenta sobre um linguagem lógica denominada Temporal Contextua) Logic Programming que integra modularidade com raciocínio temporal fazendo com que a utilização de um módulo dependa do tempo do contexto. Esta linguagem é a evolução de uma outra, também introduzida nesta tese, que combina Contextua) Logic Programming com Temporal Annotated Constraint Logic Programming, na qual a modularidade e o tempo são características ortogonais. Ambas as linguagens são formalmente discutidas e exemplificadas. As principais contribuições do trabalho descrito nesta tese incluem: • Optimização de Contextua) Logic Programming (CxLP) através de interpretação abstracta. • Sintaxe e semântica operacional para uma linguagem que combina de um modo independente as linguagens Temporal Annotated Constraint Logic Programming (TACLP) e CxLP. É apresentado um compilador para esta linguagem. • Linguagem (sintaxe e semântica) que integra de um modo inovador modularidade (CxLP) com raciocínio temporal (TACLP). Nesta linguagem a utilização de um dado módulo está dependente do tempo do contexto. É descrito um interpretador e um compilador para esta linguagem. • Ambiente de trabalho para construir e fazer a manutenção de SIO Temporais. Assenta sobre uma especificação revista da linguagem ISCO, adicionando classes e manipulação de dados temporais. É fornecido um compilador em que a linguagem resultante é a descrita no item anterior. ABSTRACT- Current Organisational Information Systems (OIS) deal with more and more Infor-mation that, is time dependent. In this work we provide a framework to construct and maintain Temporal OIS. This framework builds upon a logical language called Temporal Contextual. Logic Programming that deeply integrates modularity with tem-poral reasoning making the usage of a module time dependent. This language is an evolution of another one, also introduced in this thesis, that combines Contextual Logic Programming with Temporal Annotated Constraint Logic Programming where modularity and time are orthogonal features. Both languages are formally discussed and illustrated. The main contributions of the work described in this thesis include: • Optimisation of Contextual Logic Programming (CxLP) through abstract interpretation. • Syntax and operational semantics for an independent combination of the temporal framework Temporal Annotated Constraint Logic Programming (TACLP) and CxLP. A compiler for this language is also provided. • Language (syntax and semantics) that integrates in a innovative way modularity (CxLP) with temporal reasoning (TACLP). In this language the usage of a given module depends of the time of the context. An interpreter and a compiler for this language are described. • Framework to construct and maintain Temporal Organisational Information Systems. It builds upon a revised specification of the language ISCO, adding temporal classes and temporal data manipulation. A compiler targeting the language presented in the previous item is also given

Automatic Synthesis of Logical Models for Order-Sorted First-Order Theories

[EN] In program analysis, the synthesis of models of logical theories representing the program semantics is often useful to prove program properties. We use order-sorted first- order logic as an appropriate framework to describe the semantics and properties of programs as given theories. Then we investigate the automatic synthesis of models for such theories. We use convex polytopic domains as a flexible approach to associate different domains to different sorts. We introduce a framework for the piecewise definition of functions and predicates. We develop its use with linear expressions (in a wide sense, including linear transformations represented as matrices) and inequalities to specify functions and predicates. In this way, algorithms and tools from linear algebra and arithmetic constraint solving (e.g., SMT) can be used as a backend for an efficient implementation.Partially supported by the EU (FEDER), projects TIN2015-69175-C4-1-R, and GV PROMETEOII/2015/ 013. R. Gutiérrez also supported by Juan de la Cierva Fellowship JCI-2012-13528.Lucas Alba, S.; Gutiérrez Gil, R. (2018). Automatic Synthesis of Logical Models for Order-Sorted First-Order Theories. Journal of Automated Reasoning. 60(4):465-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-017-9419-3S465501604Alarcón, B., Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S., Navarro-Marset, R.: Proving termination properties with MU-TERM. In: Proceedings of AMAST’10. LNCS, vol. 6486, pp. 201–208 (2011)Alarcón, B., Lucas, S., Navarro-Marset, R.: Using matrix interpretations over the reals in proofs of termination. In: Proceedings of PROLE’09, pp. 255–264 (2009)Albert, E., Genaim, S., Gutiérrez, R.: A Transformational Approach to Resource Analysis with Typed-Norms. Revised Selected Papers from LOPSTR’13. LNCS, vol. 8901, pp 38–53 (2013)de Angelis, E., Fioravante, F., Pettorossi, A., Proietti, M.: Proving correctness of imperative programs by linearizing constrained Horn clauses. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 15(4–5), 635–650 (2015)de Angelis, E., Fioravante, F., Pettorossi, A., Proietti, M.: Semantics-based generation of verification conditions by program specialization. In: Proceedings of PPDP’15, pp. 91–102. ACM Press, New York (2015)Aoto, T.: Solution to the problem of zantema on a persistent property of term rewriting systems. J. Funct. Log. Program. 2001(11), 1–20 (2001)Barwise, J.: An Introduction to First-Order Logic. In: Barwise, J. (ed.) Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977)Barwise, J.: Axioms for Abstract Model Theory. Ann. Math. Log. 7, 221–265 (1974)Bochnak, J., Coste, M., Roy, M.-F.: Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer, Berlin (1998)Birkhoff, G., Lipson, J.D.: Heterogeneous algebras. J. Comb. Theory 8, 115–133 (1970)Bofill, M., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E., Rubio, A.: The Barcelogic SMT Solver. In: Proceedings of CAV’08. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 294–298 (2008)Bjørner, N., Gurfinkel, A., McMillan, K., Rybalchenko, A.: Horn-clause solvers for program verification. In: Fields of Logic and Computation II—Essays Dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the Occasion of His 75th Birthday. LNCS, vol. 9300, pp. 24–51 (2015)Bjørner, N., McMillan, K., Rybalchenko, A.: On solving universally quantified horn-clauses. In: Proceedings of SAS’13. LNCS vol. 7935, pp. 105–125 (2013)Bjørner, N., McMillan, K., Rybalchenko, A.: Program verification as satisfiability modulo theories. In: Proceedings of SMT’12, EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 20, pp. 3–11 (2013)Bliss, G.A.: Algebraic Functions. Dover (2004)Bonfante, G., Marion, J.-Y., Moyen, J.-Y.: On Lexicographic Termination Ordering With Space Bound Certifications. Revised Papers from PSI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2244, pp. 482–493 (2001)Boolos, G.S., Burgess, J.P., Jeffrey, R.C.: Computability and Logic, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Borralleras, C., Lucas, S., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez, E., Rubio, A.: SAT modulo linear arithmetic for solving polynomial constraints. J. Autom. Reason. 48, 107–131 (2012)Bürckert, H.-J., Hollunder, B., Laux, A.: On Skolemization in constrained logics. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 18, 95–131 (1996)Burstall, R.M., Goguen, J.A.: Putting Theories together to make specifications. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’77, pp. 1045–1058. William Kaufmann (1977)Caplain, M.: Finding invariant assertions for proving programs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliable Software, pp. 165–171. ACM Press, New York (1975)Chang, C.L., Lee, R.C.: Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, Orlando (1973)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude—A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS 4350, (2007)Cohn, A.G.: Improving the expressiveness of many sorted logic. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 84–87. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1983)Contejean, E., Marché, C., Tomás, A.-P., Urbain, X.: Mechanically proving termination using polynomial interpretations. J. Autom. Reason. 34(4), 325–363 (2006)Cooper, D.C.: Programs for mechanical program verification. Mach. Intell. 6, 43–59 (1971). Edinburgh University PressCooper, D.C.: Theorem proving in arithmetic without multiplication. Mach. Intell. 7, 91–99 (1972)Courtieu, P., Gbedo, G., Pons, O.: Improved matrix interpretations. In: Proceedings of SOFSEM’10. LNCS, vol. 5901, pp. 283–295 (2010)Cousot, P., Cousot, R., Mauborgne, L.: Logical abstract domains and interpretations. In: The Future of Sofware Engineering, pp. 48–71. Springer, New York (2011)Cousot, P., Halbwachs, N.: Automatic Discovery of linear restraints among variables of a program. In: Conference Record of POPL’78, pp. 84–96. ACM Press, New York (1978)Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Elspas, B., Levitt, K.N., Waldinger, R.J., Waksman, A.: An assessment of techniques for proving program correctness. Comput. Surv. 4(2), 97–147 (1972)van Emdem, M.H., Kowalski, R.A.: The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. J. ACM 23(4), 733–742 (1976)Endrullis, J., Waldmann, J., Zantema, H.: Matrix interpretations for proving termination of term rewriting. In: Proceedings of IJCAR’06. LNCS, vol. 4130, pp. 574–588 (2006)Endrullis, J., Waldmann, J., Zantema, H.: Matrix interpretations for proving termination of term rewriting. J. Autom. Reason. 40(2–3), 195–220 (2008)Floyd, R.W.: Assigning meanings to programs. Math. Asp. Comput. Sci. 19, 19–32 (1967)Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Middeldorp, A., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R., Zankl, H.: Maximal termination. In: Proceedings of RTA’08. LNCS, vol. 5117, pp. 110–125 (2008)Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Parting, M., Schneider-Kamp, P., Swiderski, S.: Proving termination by dependency pairs and inductive theorem proving. J. Autom. Reason. 47, 133–160 (2011)Fuhs, C., Kop, C.: Polynomial interpretations for higher-order rewriting. In: Proceedings of RTA’12. LIPIcs, vol. 15, pp. 176–192 (2012)Futatsugi, K., Diaconescu, R.: CafeOBJ Report. World Scientific, AMAST Series, (1998)Gaboardi, M., Péchoux, R.: On bounding space usage of streams using interpretation analysis. Sci. Comput. Program. 111, 395–425 (2015)Giesl, J., Mesnard, F., Rubio, A., Thiemann, R., Waldmann, J.: Termination competition (termCOMP 2015). In: Proceedings of CADE’15. LNCS, vol. 9195, pp. 105–108 (2015)Giesl, J., Ströder, T., Schneider-Kamp, P., Emmes, F., Fuhs, C.: Symbolic evaluation graphs and term rewriting—a general methodology for analyzing logic programs. In: Proceedings of the PPDP’12, pp. 1–12. ACM Press (2012)Giesl, J., Raffelsieper, M., Schneider-Kamp, P., Swiderski, S., Thiemann, R.: Automated termination proofs for haskell by term rewriting. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 33(2), 7 (2011)Gnaedig, I.: Termination of Order-sorted Rewriting. In: Proceedings of ALP’92. LNCS, vol. 632, pp. 37–52 (1992)Goguen, J.A.: Order-Sorted Algebra. Semantics and Theory of Computation Report 14, UCLA (1978)Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Some fundamental algebraic tools for the semantics of computation. Part 1: comma categories, colimits, signatures and theories. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 31, 175–209 (1984)Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Some fundamental algebraic tools for the semantics of computation. Part 2 signed and abstract theories. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 31, 263–295 (1984)Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Models and equality for logical programming. In: Proceedings of TAPSOFT’87. LNCS, vol. 250, pp. 1–22 (1987)Goguen, J.A., Thatcher, J.W., Wagner, E.G.: An initial algebra approach to the specification, correctness and implementation of abstract data types. In: Current Trends in Programming Methodology, pp. 80–149. Prentice Hall (1978)Goguen, J.A., Meseguer, J.: Remarks on remarks on many-sorted equational logic. Sigplan Notices 22(4), 41–48 (1987)Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Order-sorted algebra I: equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 105, 217–273 (1992)Goguen, J.A., Winkler, T., Meseguer, J., Futatsugi, K., Jouannaud, J.-P.: Introducing OBJ. In: Goguen, J., Malcolm, G. (eds.) Software Engineering with OBJ: Algebraic Specification in Action. Kluwer, Boston (2000)Grebenshikov, S., Lopes, N.P., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Synthesizing software verifiers from proof rules. In: Proceedings of PLDI’12, pp. 405–416. ACM Press (2012)Gulwani, S., Tiwari, A.: Combining Abstract Interpreters. In: Proceedings of PLDI’06, pp. 376–386. ACM Press (2006)Gurfinkel, A., Kahsai, T., Komuravelli, A., Navas, J.A.: The seahorn verification framework. In: Proceedings of CAV’15, Part I. LNCS, vol. 9206, pp. 343–361 (2015)Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S., Reinoso, P.: A tool for the automatic generation of logical models of order-sorted first-order theories. In: Proceedings of PROLE’16, pp. 215–230 (2016). http://zenon.dsic.upv.es/ages/Hantler, S.L., King, J.C.: An introduction to proving the correctness of programs. ACM Comput. Surv. 8(3), 331–353 (1976)Hayes, P.: A logic of actions. Mach. Intell. 6, 495–520 (1971). Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghHeidergott, B., Olsder, G.J., van der Woude, J.: Max plus at work. A course on max-plus algebra and its applications. In: Modeling and Analysis of Synchronized Systems, Princeton University Press (2006)Hirokawa, N., Moser, G.: Automated complexity analysis based on the dependency pair method. In: Proceedings of IJCAR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5195, pp. 364–379 (2008)Hoare, C.A.R.: An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Commun. ACM 12(10), 576–583 (1969)Hodges, W.: Elementary Predicate Logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 1, pp. 1–131. Reidel Publishing Company (1983)Hodges, W.: A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Hofbauer, D.: Termination proofs by context-dependent interpretation. In: Proceedings of RTA’01. LNCS, vol. 2051, pp. 108–121 (2001)Hofbauer, D.: Termination proofs for ground rewrite systems. interpretations and derivational complexity. Appl. Algebra Eng. Commun. Comput. 12, 21–38 (2001)Hofbauer, D., Lautemann, C.: Termination proofs and the length of derivations. In: Proceedings of RTA’89. LNCS, vol. 355, pp. 167–177 (1989)Hull, T.E., Enright, W.H., Sedgwick, A.E.: The correctness of numerical algorithms. In: Proceedings of PAAP’72, pp. 66–73 (1972)Igarashi, S., London, R.L., Luckham, D.: Automatic program verification I: a logical basis and its implementation. Acta Inform. 4, 145–182 (1975)Iwami, M.: Persistence of termination of term rewriting systems with ordered sorts. In: Proceedings of 5th JSSST Workshop on Programming and Programming Languages, Shizuoka, Japan, pp. 47–56. (2003)Iwami, M.: Persistence of termination for non-overlapping term rewriting systems. In: Proceedings of Algebraic Systems, Formal Languages and Conventional and Unconventional Computation Theory, Kokyuroku RIMS, University of Kyoto, vol. 1366, pp. 91–99 (2004)Katz, S., Manna, Z.: Logical analysis of programs. Commun. ACM 19(4), 188–206 (1976)Langford, C.H.: Review: Über deduktive Theorien mit mehreren Sorten von Grunddingen. J. Symb. Log. 4(2), 98 (1939)Lankford, D.S.: Some approaches to equality for computational logic: a survey and assessment. Memo ATP-36, Automatic Theorem Proving Project, University of Texas, Austin, TXLondon, R.L.: The current state of proving programs correct. In: Proceedings of ACM’72, vol. 1, pp. 39–46. ACM (1972)Lucas, S.: Polynomials over the reals in proofs of termination: from theory to practice. RAIRO Theor. Inform. Appl. 39(3), 547–586 (2005)Lucas, S.: Synthesis of models for order-sorted first-order theories using linear algebra and constraint solving. Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci. 200, 32–47 (2015)Lucas, S.: Use of logical models for proving operational termination in general logics. In: Selected Papers from WRLA’16. LNCS, vol. 9942, pp. 1–21 (2016)Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J.: Operational termination of conditional term rewriting systems. Inform. Proces. Lett. 95, 446–453 (2005)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Models for logics and conditional constraints in automated proofs of termination. In: Proceedings of AISC’14. LNAI, vol. 8884, pp. 7–18 (2014)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Order-sorted dependency pairs. In: Proceedings of PPDP’08 , pp. 108–119. ACM Press (2008)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Proving operational termination of declarative programs in general logics. In: Proceedings of PPDP’14, pp. 111–122. ACM Digital Library (2014)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Dependency pairs for proving termination properties of conditional term rewriting systems. J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. 86, 236–268 (2017)Manna, Z.: The correctness of programs. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 3, 119–127 (1969)Manna, Z.: Properties of programs and the first-order predicate calculus. J. ACM 16(2), 244–255 (1969)Manna, Z.: Termination of programs represented as interpreted graphs. In: Proceedings of AFIPS’70, pp. 83–89 (1970)Manna, Z., Ness, S.: On the termination of Markov algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Third Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 789–792 (1970)Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Formalization of properties of functional programs. J. ACM 17(3), 555–569 (1970)Marion, Y.-I., Péchoux, R.: Sup-interpretations, a semantic method for static analysis of program resources. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 10(4), 27 (2009)Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Palomino, M.: Theoroidal maps as algebraic simulations. Revised Selected Papers from WADT’04. LNCS, vol. 3423, pp. 126–143 (2005)McCarthy, J.: Recursive functions of symbolic expressions and their computation by machine. Part I. Commun. ACM 3(4), 184–195 (1960)Meseguer, J.: General logics. In: Ebbinghaus, H.D., et al. (eds.) Logic Colloquium’87, pp. 275–329. North-Holland (1989)Meseguer, J., Skeirik, S.: Equational formulas and pattern operations in initial order-sorted algebras. Revised Selected Papers from LOPSTR’15. LNCS, vol. 9527, pp. 36–53 (2015)Middeldorp, A.: Matrix interpretations for polynomial derivational complexity of rewrite systems. In: Proceedings of LPAR’12. LNCS, vol. 7180, p. 12 (2012)Monin, J.-F.: Understanding Formal Methods. Springer, London (2003)Montenegro, M., Peña, R., Segura, C.: Space consumption analysis by abstract interpretation: inference of recursive functions. Sci. Comput. Program. 111, 426–457 (2015)de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Satisfiability modulo theories: introduction and applications. Commun. ACM 54(9), 69–77 (2011)Naur, P.: Proof of algorithms by general snapshots. Bit 6, 310–316 (1966)Neurauter, F., Middeldorp, A.: Revisiting matrix interpretations for proving termination of term rewriting. In: Proceedings of RTA’11. LIPICS, vol. 10, pp. 251–266 (2011)Ohlebusch, E.: Advanced Topics in Term Rewriting. Springer, New York (2002)Ölveczky, P.C., Lysne, O.: Order-sorted termination: the unsorted way. In: Proceedings of ALP’96. LNCS, vol. 1139, pp. 92–106 (1996)Otto, C., Brockschmidt, M., von Essen, C., Giesl, J.: Automated termination analysis of java bytecode by term rewriting. In: Proceedings of RTA’10. LIPICS, vol. 6, pp. 259–276 (2010)Péchoux, R.: Synthesis of sup-interpretations: a survey. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 467, 30–52 (2013)Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Transition invariants. In: IEEE Computer Society Proceedings of LICS’04, pp. 32–41 (2004)Prestel, A., Delzell, C.N.: Positive Polynomials. From Hilbert’s 17th Problem to Real Algebra. Springer, Berlin (2001)Robinson, D.J.S.: A Course in Linear Algebra with Applications, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing, Co, Singapore (2006)Rümmer, P., Hojjat, H., Kuncak, V.: Disjunctive interpolants for horn-clause verification. In: Proceedings of CAV’13, vol. 8044, pp. 347–363 (2013)Schrijver, A.: Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. Wiley, Amsterdam (1986)Schmidt, A.: Über deduktive Theorien mit mehreren Sorten von Grunddingen. Matematische Annalen 115(4), 485–506 (1938)Schmidt-Schauss, M.: Computational Aspects Of An Order-Sorted Logic With Term Declarations. PhD Thesis, Fachbereich Informatik der Universität Kaiserslautern (1988)Shapiro, S.: Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Clarendon Press, New York (1991)Shostak, R.E.: A practical decision procedure for arithmetic with function symbols. J. ACM 26(2), 351–360 (1979)Smullyan, R.M.: Theory of Formal Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1961)Tarski, A.: A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry, 2nd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley (1951)Toyama, Y.: Counterexamples to termination for the direct sum of term rewriting systems. Inform. Process. Lett. 25, 141–143 (1987)Turing, A.M.: Checking a large routine. In: Report of a Conference on High Speed Automatic Calculating Machines, University Mathematics Laboratory, Cambridge, pp. 67–69 (1949)Urban, C.: The abstract domain of segmented ranking functions. In: Proceeding of SAS’13. LNCS, vol. 7935, pp. 43–62 (2013)Urban, C., Gurfinkel, A., Kahsai, T.: Synthesizing ranking functions from bits and pieces. In: Proceedings of TACAS’16. LNCS, vol. 9636, pp. 54–70 (2016)Waldmann, J.: Matrix interpretations on polyhedral domains. In: Proceedings of RTA’15. LIPICS, vol. 26, pp. 318–333 (2015)Waldmann, J., Bau, A., Noeth, E.: Matchbox termination prover. http://github.com/jwaldmann/matchbox/ (2014)Walther, C.: A mechanical solution of schubert’s steamroller by many-sorted resolution. Aritif. Intell. 26, 217–224 (1985)Wang, H.: Logic of many-sorted theories. J. Symb. Logic 17(2), 105–116 (1952)Zantema, H.: Termination of term rewriting: interpretation and type elimination. J. Symb. Comput. 17, 23–50 (1994

αCheck: a mechanized metatheory model-checker

The problem of mechanically formalizing and proving metatheoretic properties of programming language calculi, type systems, operational semantics, and related formal systems has received considerable attention recently. However, the dual problem of searching for errors in such formalizations has attracted comparatively little attention. In this article, we present $\alpha$Check, a bounded model-checker for metatheoretic properties of formal systems specified using nominal logic. In contrast to the current state of the art for metatheory verification, our approach is fully automatic, does not require expertise in theorem proving on the part of the user, and produces counterexamples in the case that a flaw is detected. We present two implementations of this technique, one based on negation-as-failure and one based on negation elimination, along with experimental results showing that these techniques are fast enough to be used interactively to debug systems as they are developed.Comment: Under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP