Digital phase-locked loops tracked by a relay sensor

An optimal algorithm is presented for tracking the phase of a slowly modulating signal by means of digital sampling of its sign. Error bounds and a numerical illustration are given

Highly corrupted image inpainting through hypoelliptic diffusion

We present a new image inpainting algorithm, the Averaging and Hypoelliptic Evolution (AHE) algorithm, inspired by the one presented in [SIAM J. Imaging Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 669--695, 2014] and based upon a semi-discrete variation of the Citti-Petitot-Sarti model of the primary visual cortex V1. The AHE algorithm is based on a suitable combination of sub-Riemannian hypoelliptic diffusion and ad-hoc local averaging techniques. In particular, we focus on reconstructing highly corrupted images (i.e. where more than the 80% of the image is missing), for which we obtain reconstructions comparable with the state-of-the-art.Comment: 15 pages, 10 figure

Vector-exponential time-series modeling for polynomial J-spectral factorization

An iterative algorithm to perform the J-spectral factorization of a para-Hermitian matrix is presented. The algorithm proceeds by computing a special kernel representation of an interpolant for a sequence of points and associated directions determined from the spectral zeroes of the to-be factored matrix

Near-optimal small-depth lower bounds for small distance connectivity

We show that any depth-$d$ circuit for determining whether an $n$-node graph has an $s$-to-$t$ path of length at most $k$ must have size $n^{\Omega(k^{1/d}/d)}$. The previous best circuit size lower bounds for this problem were $n^{k^{\exp(-O(d))}}$ (due to Beame, Impagliazzo, and Pitassi [BIP98]) and $n^{\Omega((\log k)/d)}$ (following from a recent formula size lower bound of Rossman [Ros14]). Our lower bound is quite close to optimal, since a simple construction gives depth-$d$ circuits of size $n^{O(k^{2/d})}$ for this problem (and strengthening our bound even to $n^{k^{\Omega(1/d)}}$ would require proving that undirected connectivity is not in $\mathsf{NC^1}.$) Our proof is by reduction to a new lower bound on the size of small-depth circuits computing a skewed variant of the "Sipser functions" that have played an important role in classical circuit lower bounds [Sip83, Yao85, H{\aa}s86]. A key ingredient in our proof of the required lower bound for these Sipser-like functions is the use of \emph{random projections}, an extension of random restrictions which were recently employed in [RST15]. Random projections allow us to obtain sharper quantitative bounds while employing simpler arguments, both conceptually and technically, than in the previous works [Ajt89, BPU92, BIP98, Ros14]