Reconstructing phylogenetic level-1 networks from nondense binet and trinet sets

Binets and trinets are phylogenetic networks with two and three leaves, respectively. Here we consider the problem of deciding if there exists a binary level-1 phylogenetic network displaying a given set T of binary binets or trinets over a taxon set X, and constructing such a network whenever it exists. We show that this is NP-hard for trinets but polynomial-time solvable for binets. Moreover, we show that the problem is still polynomial-time solvable for inputs consisting of binets and trinets as long as the cycles in the trinets have size three. Finally, we present an O(3^{|X|} poly(|X|)) time algorithm for general sets of binets and trinets. The latter two algorithms generalise to instances containing level-1 networks with arbitrarily many leaves, and thus provide some of the first supernetwork algorithms for computing networks from a set of rooted 1 phylogenetic networks

TriLoNet: Piecing together small networks to reconstruct reticulate evolutionary histories

Phylogenetic networks are a generalisation of evolutionary trees that can be used to represent reticulate processes such as hybridisation and recombination. Here we introduce a new approach called TriLoNet to construct such networks directly from sequence alignments which works by piecing together smaller phylogenetic networks. More specifically, using a bottom up approach similar to Neighbor-Joining, TriLoNet constructs level-1 networks (networks that are somewhat more general than trees) from smaller level-1 networks on three taxa. In simulations we show that TriLoNet compares well with Lev1athan, a method for reconstructing level-1 networks from three-leaved trees. In particular, in simulations we find that Lev1athan tends to generate networks that overestimate the number of reticulate events as compared with those generated by TriLoNet. We also illustrate TriLoNet’s applicability using simulated and real sequence data involving recombination, demonstrating that it has the potential to reconstruct informative reticulate evolutionary histories. TriLoNet has been implemented in JAVA and is freely available at https://www.uea.ac.uk/computing/TriLoNet

Binets: fundamental building blocks for phylogenetic networks

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees that are used by biologists to represent the evolution of organisms which have undergone reticulate evolution. Essentially, a phylogenetic network is a directed acyclic graph having a unique root in which the leaves are labelled by a given set of species. Recently, some approaches have been developed to construct phylogenetic networks from collections of networks on 2- and 3-leaved networks, which are known as binets and trinets, respectively. Here we study in more depth properties of collections of binets, one of the simplest possible types of networks into which a phylogenetic network can be decomposed. More speci_cally, we show that if a collection of level-1 binets is compatible with some binary network, then it is also compatible with a binary level-1 network. Our proofs are based on useful structural results concerning lowest stable ancestors in networks. In addition, we show that, although the binets do not determine the topology of the network, they do determine the number of reticulations in the network, which is one of its most important parameters. We also consider algorithmic questions concerning binets. We show that deciding whether an arbitrary set of binets is compatible with some network is at least as hard as the well-known Graph Isomorphism problem. However, if we restrict to level-1 binets, it is possible to decide in polynomial time whether there exists a binary network that displays all the binets. We also show that to _nd a network that displays a maximum number of the binets is NP-hard, but that there exists a simple polynomial-time 1/3-approximation algorithm for this problem. It is hoped that these results will eventually assist in the development of new methods for constructing phylogenetic networks from collections of smaller networks

Constructing Phylogenetic Networks based on Trinets

Abstract The motivation of phylogenetic analysis is to discover the evolutionary relationships between species, with the broader aim of understanding the origins of life. Our understanding of the molecular character- istics of species through DNA sequencing permanently changed the approach to understanding the evolution of species. Indeed, the ad- vancement of technology has played a major role in the fast sequencing of DNA as well as the use of computers in solving biological problems in general. These evolutionary relationships are often visualised and represented using a phylogenetic tree. As a natural generalisation of phylogenetic trees, phylogenetic networks are used in biology to rep- resent evolutionary histories that contain reticulate, or non-treelike events such as recombination, hybridisation and horizontal gene trans- fer. The reconstruction of explicit phylogenetic networks from biolog- ical data is currently an active area of phylogenetics research. Here we consider the problem of constructing such networks from trinets, that is, phylogenetic networks on three leaves. More speci�cally, we present the SeqTrinet and TriLoNet methods, which form a supernet- work based approach to constructing level-1 phylogenetic networks directly from multiple sequence alignments

Hierarchies from lowest stable ancestors in nonbinary phylogenetic networks

The reconstruction of the evolutionary history of a set of species is an important problem in classification and phylogenetics. Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees that are used to represent histories for species that have undergone reticulate evolution, an important evolutionary force for many organisms (e.g. plants or viruses). In this paper, we present a novel approach to understanding the structure of networks that are not necessarily binary. More specifically, we define the concept of a closed set and show that the collection of closed sets of a network forms a hierarchy, and that this hierarchy can be deduced from either the subtrees or subnetworks on all 3-subsets. This allows us to also show that closed sets generalize the concept of the SN-sets of a binary network, sets which have proven very useful in elucidating the structure of binary networks. We also characterize the minimal closed sets (under set inclusion) for a special class of networks (2-terminal networks). Taken together, we anticipate that our results should be useful for the development of new phylogenetic network reconstruction algorithms

Beyond representing orthology relations by trees

Reconstructing the evolutionary past of a family of genes is an important aspect of many genomic studies. To help with this, simple relations on a set of sequences called orthology relations may be employed. In addition to being interesting from a practical point of view they are also attractive from a theoretical perspective in that e.\,g.\,a characterization is known for when such a relation is representable by a certain type of phylogenetic tree. For an orthology relation inferred from real biological data it is however generally too much to hope for that it satisfies that characterization. Rather than trying to correct the data in some way or another which has its own drawbacks, as an alternative, we propose to represent an orthology relation $\delta$ in terms of a structure more general than a phylogenetic tree called a phylogenetic network. To compute such a network in the form of a level-1 representation for $\delta$, we formalize an orthology relation in terms of the novel concept of a symbolic 3- dissimilarity which is motivated by the biological concept of a ``cluster of orthologous groups'', or COG for short. For such maps which assign symbols rather that real values to elements, we introduce the novel {\sc Network-Popping} algorithm which has several attractive properties. In addition, we characterize an orthology relation $\delta$ on some set $X$ that has a level-1 representation in terms of eight natural properties for $\delta$ as well as in terms of level-1 representations of orthology relations on certain subsets of $X$

Quarnet Inference Rules for Level-1 Networks

An important problem in phylogenetics is the construction of phylogenetic trees. One way to approach this problem, known as the supertree method, involves inferring a phylogenetic tree with leaves consisting of a set X of species from a collection of trees, each having leaf-set some subset of X. In the 1980s, Colonius and Schulze gave certain inference rules for deciding when a collection of 4-leaved trees, one for each 4-element subset of X, can be simultaneously displayed by a single supertree with leaf-set X. Recently, it has become of interest to extend this and related results to phylogenetic networks. These are a generalization of phylogenetic trees which can be used to represent reticulate evolution (where species can come together to form a new species). It has recently been shown that a certain type of phylogenetic network, called a (unrooted) level-1 network, can essentially be constructed from 4-leaved trees. However, the problem of providing appropriate inference rules for such networks remains unresolved. Here, we show that by considering 4-leaved networks, called quarnets, as opposed to 4-leaved trees, it is possible to provide such rules. In particular, we show that these rules can be used to characterize when a collection of quarnets, one for each 4-element subset of X, can all be simultaneously displayed by a level-1 network with leaf-set X. The rules are an intriguing mixture of tree inference rules, and an inference rule for building up a cyclic ordering of X from orderings on subsets of X of size 4. This opens up several new directions of research for inferring phylogenetic networks from smaller ones, which could yield new algorithms for solving the supernetwork problem in phylogenetics