2,513 research outputs found
On FO2 quantifier alternation over words
We show that each level of the quantifier alternation hierarchy within
FO^2[<] -- the 2-variable fragment of the first order logic of order on words
-- is a variety of languages. We then use the notion of condensed rankers, a
refinement of the rankers defined by Weis and Immerman, to produce a decidable
hierarchy of varieties which is interwoven with the quantifier alternation
hierarchy -- and conjecturally equal to it. It follows that the latter
hierarchy is decidable within one unit: given a formula alpha in FO^2[<], one
can effectively compute an integer m such that alpha is equivalent to a formula
with at most m+1 alternating blocks of quantifiers, but not to a formula with
only m-1 blocks. This is a much more precise result than what is known about
the quantifier alternation hierarchy within FO[<], where no decidability result
is known beyond the very first levels
Subshifts, MSO Logic, and Collapsing Hierarchies
We use monadic second-order logic to define two-dimensional subshifts, or
sets of colorings of the infinite plane. We present a natural family of
quantifier alternation hierarchies, and show that they all collapse to the
third level. In particular, this solves an open problem of [Jeandel & Theyssier
2013]. The results are in stark contrast with picture languages, where such
hierarchies are usually infinite.Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures. To appear in conference proceedings of TCS 2014,
published by Springe
Recommended from our members
Discovering qualitative empirical laws
In this paper we describe GLAUBER, an AI system that models the scientific discovery of qualitative empirical laws. We have tested the system on data from the history of early chemistry, and it has rediscovered such concepts as acids, alkalis, and salts, as well as laws relating these concepts. After discussing GLAUBER we examine the program's relation to other discovery systems, particularly methods for conceptual clustering and language acquisition
Separating regular languages with two quantifier alternations
We investigate a famous decision problem in automata theory: separation.
Given a class of language C, the separation problem for C takes as input two
regular languages and asks whether there exists a third one which belongs to C,
includes the first one and is disjoint from the second. Typically, obtaining an
algorithm for separation yields a deep understanding of the investigated class
C. This explains why a lot of effort has been devoted to finding algorithms for
the most prominent classes.
Here, we are interested in classes within concatenation hierarchies. Such
hierarchies are built using a generic construction process: one starts from an
initial class called the basis and builds new levels by applying generic
operations. The most famous one, the dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and
Cohen, classifies the languages definable in first-order logic. Moreover, it
was shown by Thomas that it corresponds to the quantifier alternation hierarchy
of first-order logic: each level in the dot-depth corresponds to the languages
that can be defined with a prescribed number of quantifier blocks. Finding
separation algorithms for all levels in this hierarchy is among the most famous
open problems in automata theory.
Our main theorem is generic: we show that separation is decidable for the
level 3/2 of any concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite. Furthermore, in
the special case of the dot-depth, we push this result to the level 5/2. In
logical terms, this solves separation for : first-order sentences
having at most three quantifier blocks starting with an existential one
The FO^2 alternation hierarchy is decidable
We consider the two-variable fragment FO^2[<] of first-order logic over
finite words. Numerous characterizations of this class are known. Th\'erien and
Wilke have shown that it is decidable whether a given regular language is
definable in FO^2[<]. From a practical point of view, as shown by Weis, FO^2[<]
is interesting since its satisfiability problem is in NP. Restricting the
number of quantifier alternations yields an infinite hierarchy inside the class
of FO^2[<]-definable languages. We show that each level of this hierarchy is
decidable. For this purpose, we relate each level of the hierarchy with a
decidable variety of finite monoids. Our result implies that there are many
different ways of climbing up the FO^2[<]-quantifier alternation hierarchy:
deterministic and co-deterministic products, Mal'cev products with definite and
reverse definite semigroups, iterated block products with J-trivial monoids,
and some inductively defined omega-term identities. A combinatorial tool in the
process of ascension is that of condensed rankers, a refinement of the rankers
of Weis and Immerman and the turtle programs of Schwentick, Th\'erien, and
Vollmer
Languages of Dot-depth One over Infinite Words
Over finite words, languages of dot-depth one are expressively complete for
alternation-free first-order logic. This fragment is also known as the Boolean
closure of existential first-order logic. Here, the atomic formulas comprise
order, successor, minimum, and maximum predicates. Knast (1983) has shown that
it is decidable whether a language has dot-depth one. We extend Knast's result
to infinite words. In particular, we describe the class of languages definable
in alternation-free first-order logic over infinite words, and we give an
effective characterization of this fragment. This characterization has two
components. The first component is identical to Knast's algebraic property for
finite words and the second component is a topological property, namely being a
Boolean combination of Cantor sets.
As an intermediate step we consider finite and infinite words simultaneously.
We then obtain the results for infinite words as well as for finite words as
special cases. In particular, we give a new proof of Knast's Theorem on
languages of dot-depth one over finite words.Comment: Presented at LICS 201
- …