Weakly complete axiomatization of exogenous quantum propositional logic

A weakly complete finitary axiomatization for EQPL (exogenous quantum propositional logic) is presented. The proof is carried out using a non trivial extension of the Fagin-Halpern-Megiddo technique together with three Henkin style completions.Comment: 28 page

On Counting Propositional Logic and Wagner's Hierarchy

We introduce and study counting propositional logic, an extension of propositional logic with counting quantifiers. This new kind of quantification makes it possible to express that the argument formula is true in a certain portion of all possible interpretations. We show that this logic, beyond admitting a satisfactory proof-theoretical treatment, can be related to computational complexity: the complexity of the underlying decision problem perfectly matches the appropriate level of Wagner's counting hierarchy

On Measure Quantifiers in First-Order Arithmetic

We study the logic obtained by endowing the language of first-order arithmetic with second-order measure quantifiers. This new kind of quantification allows us to express that the argument formula is true in a certain portion of all possible interpretations of the quantified variable. We show that first-order arithmetic with measure quantifiers is capable of formalizing simple results from probability theory and, most importantly, of representing every recursive random function. Moreover, we introduce a realizability interpretation of this logic in which programs have access to an oracle from the Cantor space

On Counting Propositional Logic and Wagner's Hierarchy

We introduce an extension of classical propositional logic with counting quantifiers. These forms of quantification make it possible to express that a formula is true in a certain portion of the set of all its interpretations. Beyond providing a sound and complete proof system for this logic, we show that validity problems for counting propositional logic can be used to capture counting complexity classes. More precisely, we show that the complexity of the decision problems for validity of prenex formulas of this logic perfectly match the appropriate levels of Wagner's counting hierarchy

Semantics for possibilistic answer set programs: uncertain rules versus rules with uncertain conclusions

Although Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a powerful framework for declarative problem solving, it cannot in an intuitive way handle situations in which some rules are uncertain, or in which it is more important to satisfy some constraints than others. Possibilistic ASP (PASP) is a natural extension of ASP in which certainty weights are associated with each rule. In this paper we contrast two different views on interpreting the weights attached to rules. Under the first view, weights reflect the certainty with which we can conclude the head of a rule when its body is satisfied. Under the second view, weights reflect the certainty that a given rule restricts the considered epistemic states of an agent in a valid way, i.e. it is the certainty that the rule itself is correct. The first view gives rise to a set of weighted answer sets, whereas the second view gives rise to a weighted set of classical answer sets

Safe Control under Uncertainty with Probabilistic Signal Temporal Logic

Abstract-Safe control of dynamical systems that satisfy temporal invariants expressing various safety properties is a challenging problem that has drawn the attention of many researchers. However, making the assumption that such temporal properties are deterministic is far from the reality. For example, a robotic system might employ a camera sensor and a machine learned system to identify obstacles. Consequently, the safety properties the controller has to satisfy, will be a function of the sensor data and the associated classifier. We propose a framework for achieving safe control. At the heart of our approach is the new Probabilistic Signal Temporal Logic (PrSTL), an expressive language to define stochastic properties, and enforce probabilistic guarantees on them. We also present an efficient algorithm to reason about safe controllers given the constraints derived from the PrSTL specification. One of the key distinguishing features of PrSTL is that the encoded logic is adaptive and changes as the system encounters additional data and updates its beliefs about the latent random variables that define the safety properties. We demonstrate our approach by deriving safe control of quadrotors and autonomous vehicles in dynamic environments