66,132 research outputs found
Variations on the Theme of Conning in Mathematical Economics
The mathematization of economics is almost exclusively in terms of the mathematics of real analysis which, in turn, is founded on set theory (and the axiom of choice) and orthodox mathematical logic. In this paper I try to point out that this kind of mathematization is replete with economic infelicities. The attempt to extract these infelicities is in terms of three main examples: dynamics, policy and rational expectations and learning. The focus is on the role and reliance on standard xed point theorems in orthodox mathematical economics
Grey-box Modelling of a Household Refrigeration Unit Using Time Series Data in Application to Demand Side Management
This paper describes the application of stochastic grey-box modeling to
identify electrical power consumption-to-temperature models of a domestic
freezer using experimental measurements. The models are formulated using
stochastic differential equations (SDEs), estimated by maximum likelihood
estimation (MLE), validated through the model residuals analysis and
cross-validated to detect model over-fitting. A nonlinear model based on the
reversed Carnot cycle is also presented and included in the modeling
performance analysis. As an application of the models, we apply model
predictive control (MPC) to shift the electricity consumption of a freezer in
demand response experiments, thereby addressing the model selection problem
also from the application point of view and showing in an experimental context
the ability of MPC to exploit the freezer as a demand side resource (DSR).Comment: Submitted to Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks (SEGAN). Accepted
for publicatio
Is "the theory of everything'' merely the ultimate ensemble theory?
We discuss some physical consequences of what might be called ``the ultimate
ensemble theory'', where not only worlds corresponding to say different sets of
initial data or different physical constants are considered equally real, but
also worlds ruled by altogether different equations. The only postulate in this
theory is that all structures that exist mathematically exist also physically,
by which we mean that in those complex enough to contain self-aware
substructures (SASs), these SASs will subjectively perceive themselves as
existing in a physically ``real'' world. We find that it is far from clear that
this simple theory, which has no free parameters whatsoever, is observationally
ruled out. The predictions of the theory take the form of probability
distributions for the outcome of experiments, which makes it testable. In
addition, it may be possible to rule it out by comparing its a priori
predictions for the observable attributes of nature (the particle masses, the
dimensionality of spacetime, etc) with what is observed.Comment: 29 pages, revised to match version published in Annals of Physics.
The New Scientist article and color figures are available at
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~max/toe_frames.html or from [email protected]
Don't interpret focus : why a presuppositional account of focus fails, and how a presuppositional account of givenness works
This paper advances a purely presuppositional analysis of intonation. I first show that a inspiring recent article by Geurts and van der Sandt (Theoretical Linguistics, 2004) that pursues the same goal cannot account for multiple foci. Then, I show that if it is assumed that destressed rather than focussed material is semantically marked, multiple foci are accounted for correctly
Systems biology in animal sciences
Systems biology is a rapidly expanding field of research and is applied in a number of biological disciplines. In animal sciences, omics approaches are increasingly used, yielding vast amounts of data, but systems biology approaches to extract understanding from these data of biological processes and animal traits are not yet frequently used. This paper aims to explain what systems biology is and which areas of animal sciences could benefit from systems biology approaches. Systems biology aims to understand whole biological systems working as a unit, rather than investigating their individual components. Therefore, systems biology can be considered a holistic approach, as opposed to reductionism. The recently developed âomicsâ technologies enable biological sciences to characterize the molecular components of life with ever increasing speed, yielding vast amounts of data. However, biological functions do not follow from the simple addition of the properties of system components, but rather arise from the dynamic interactions of these components. Systems biology combines statistics, bioinformatics and mathematical modeling to integrate and analyze large amounts of data in order to extract a better understanding of the biology from these huge data sets and to predict the behavior of biological systems. A âsystemâ approach and mathematical modeling in biological sciences are not new in itself, as they were used in biochemistry, physiology and genetics long before the name systems biology was coined. However, the present combination of mass biological data and of computational and modeling tools is unprecedented and truly represents a major paradigm shift in biology. Significant advances have been made using systems biology approaches, especially in the field of bacterial and eukaryotic cells and in human medicine. Similarly, progress is being made with âsystem approachesâ in animal sciences, providing exciting opportunities to predict and modulate animal traits
- âŠ