Practical Fine-grained Privilege Separation in Multithreaded Applications

An inherent security limitation with the classic multithreaded programming model is that all the threads share the same address space and, therefore, are implicitly assumed to be mutually trusted. This assumption, however, does not take into consideration of many modern multithreaded applications that involve multiple principals which do not fully trust each other. It remains challenging to retrofit the classic multithreaded programming model so that the security and privilege separation in multi-principal applications can be resolved. This paper proposes ARBITER, a run-time system and a set of security primitives, aimed at fine-grained and data-centric privilege separation in multithreaded applications. While enforcing effective isolation among principals, ARBITER still allows flexible sharing and communication between threads so that the multithreaded programming paradigm can be preserved. To realize controlled sharing in a fine-grained manner, we created a novel abstraction named ARBITER Secure Memory Segment (ASMS) and corresponding OS support. Programmers express security policies by labeling data and principals via ARBITER's API following a unified model. We ported a widely-used, in-memory database application (memcached) to ARBITER system, changing only around 100 LOC. Experiments indicate that only an average runtime overhead of 5.6% is induced to this security enhanced version of application

Memory Subsystems for Security, Consistency, and Scalability

In response to the continuous demand for the ability to process ever larger datasets, as well as discoveries in next-generation memory technologies, researchers have been vigorously studying memory-driven computing architectures that shall allow data-intensive applications to access enormous amounts of pooled non-volatile memory. As applications continue to interact with increasing amounts of components and datasets, existing systems struggle to eÿciently enforce the principle of least privilege for security. While non-volatile memory can retain data even after a power loss and allow for large main memory capacity, programmers have to bear the burdens of maintaining the consistency of program memory for fault tolerance as well as handling huge datasets with traditional yet expensive memory management interfaces for scalability. Today’s computer systems have become too sophisticated for existing memory subsystems to handle many design requirements. In this dissertation, we introduce three memory subsystems to address challenges in terms of security, consistency, and scalability. Specifcally, we propose SMVs to provide threads with fne-grained control over access privileges for a partially shared address space for security, NVthreads to allow programmers to easily leverage nonvolatile memory with automatic persistence for consistency, and PetaMem to enable memory-centric applications to freely access memory beyond the traditional process boundary with support for memory isolation and crash recovery for security, consistency, and scalability

Downright : a framework and toolchain for privilege handling

© 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.We propose Downright, a novel framework based on Seccomp, Berkeley Packet Filter, and PTrace, that makes it possible to equip new and existing C applications with a request broker architecture. An extensive configuration language allows AppArmor-like configuration that supports programmers in building rules for system call parameter validation and result sanitization. Access to these privileged function calls can be restricted both within Linux kernel and user spaces. Downright's main strength compared to related approaches is that it implements a complete mediation request broker architecture, in which all system calls are vetted before execution, either by the kernel or by a request broker, which runs as another process. This isolates the main program from many failures due to programming bugs and attacks, which would have to pass not only the attacked program, but the request broker also. We argue that this makes acquiring and releasing elevated privileges easier and safer. Downright eliminates the need to write Seccomp programs, instead allowing policies to be expressed declaratively through a rich policy language. We demonstrate the viability of this approach by instrumenting nginx, an industrial-strength web server and reverse proxy. While this instrumentation takes only a single line of code, we argue that even this effort can be avoided by suitable C runtime code. We show that Downright's overhead is substantial, halving nginx's perfomance, but propose measures for optimisation

Protection Structures in Multithreaded Systems

We consider a single-address-space system which implements a form of segmentation with paging within the framework of the multithreaded model of program execution. A salient problem of a system of this type is the definition of the set of mechanisms enforcing memory protection. We present a paradigm for the protection system design that is based on the well-known concepts of protection domains and access rights. The resulting environment guarantees an effective separation of the memory resources of the different processes, whose loosely coupled interactions correspond to explicit actions of information sharing. Within the boundaries of a single multithreaded process, a less-stringent protection requirement is to confine the consequences of a programming error in the thread that originated the error. These results are obtained by taking advantage of techniques of symmetric-key cryptography to represent access privileges in memory at the level of the single pages that form a segment

AppGuard — fine-grained policy enforcement for untrusted android applications

Android’s success makes it a prominent target for malicious software. However, the user has very limited control over security-relevant operations. This work presents AppGuard, a powerful and flexible security system that overcomes these deficiencies. It enforces user-defined security policies on untrusted Android applications without requiring any changes to a smartphone’s firmware, root access, or the like. Finegrained and stateful security policies are expressed in a formal specification language, which also supports secrecy requirements. Our system offers complete mediation of security-relevant methods based on calleesite inline reference monitoring and supports widespread deployment. In the experimental analysis we demonstrate the removal of permissions for overly curious apps as well as how to defend against several recent real-world attacks on Android phones. Our technique exhibits very little space and runtime overhead. The utility of AppGuard has already been demonstrated by more than 1,000,000 downloads