20,752 research outputs found
Hardness of approximation for quantum problems
The polynomial hierarchy plays a central role in classical complexity theory.
Here, we define a quantum generalization of the polynomial hierarchy, and
initiate its study. We show that not only are there natural complete problems
for the second level of this quantum hierarchy, but that these problems are in
fact hard to approximate. Using these techniques, we also obtain hardness of
approximation for the class QCMA. Our approach is based on the use of
dispersers, and is inspired by the classical results of Umans regarding
hardness of approximation for the second level of the classical polynomial
hierarchy [Umans, FOCS 1999]. The problems for which we prove hardness of
approximation for include, among others, a quantum version of the Succinct Set
Cover problem, and a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem with hybrid
classical-quantum ground states.Comment: 21 pages, 1 figure, extended abstract appeared in Proceedings of the
39th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP),
pages 387-398, Springer, 201
Synchronization Problems in Automata without Non-trivial Cycles
We study the computational complexity of various problems related to
synchronization of weakly acyclic automata, a subclass of widely studied
aperiodic automata. We provide upper and lower bounds on the length of a
shortest word synchronizing a weakly acyclic automaton or, more generally, a
subset of its states, and show that the problem of approximating this length is
hard. We investigate the complexity of finding a synchronizing set of states of
maximum size. We also show inapproximability of the problem of computing the
rank of a subset of states in a binary weakly acyclic automaton and prove that
several problems related to recognizing a synchronizing subset of states in
such automata are NP-complete.Comment: Extended and corrected version, including arXiv:1608.00889.
Conference version was published at CIAA 2017, LNCS vol. 10329, pages
188-200, 201
Composition problems for braids: Membership, Identity and Freeness
In this paper we investigate the decidability and complexity of problems related to braid composition. While all known problems for a class of braids with three strands, , have polynomial time solutions we prove that a very natural question for braid composition, the membership problem, is NP-complete for braids with only three strands. The membership problem is decidable in NP for , but it becomes harder for a class of braids with more strands. In particular we show that fundamental problems about braid compositions are undecidable for braids with at least five strands, but decidability of these problems for remains open. Finally we show that the freeness problem for semigroups of braids from is also decidable in NP. The paper introduces a few challenging algorithmic problems about topological braids opening new connections between braid groups, combinatorics on words, complexity theory and provides solutions for some of these problems by application of several techniques from automata theory, matrix semigroups and algorithms
Beyond Language Equivalence on Visibly Pushdown Automata
We study (bi)simulation-like preorder/equivalence checking on the class of
visibly pushdown automata and its natural subclasses visibly BPA (Basic Process
Algebra) and visibly one-counter automata. We describe generic methods for
proving complexity upper and lower bounds for a number of studied preorders and
equivalences like simulation, completed simulation, ready simulation, 2-nested
simulation preorders/equivalences and bisimulation equivalence. Our main
results are that all the mentioned equivalences and preorders are
EXPTIME-complete on visibly pushdown automata, PSPACE-complete on visibly
one-counter automata and P-complete on visibly BPA. Our PSPACE lower bound for
visibly one-counter automata improves also the previously known DP-hardness
results for ordinary one-counter automata and one-counter nets. Finally, we
study regularity checking problems for visibly pushdown automata and show that
they can be decided in polynomial time.Comment: Final version of paper, accepted by LMC
Deterministic Automata for Unordered Trees
Automata for unordered unranked trees are relevant for defining schemas and
queries for data trees in Json or Xml format. While the existing notions are
well-investigated concerning expressiveness, they all lack a proper notion of
determinism, which makes it difficult to distinguish subclasses of automata for
which problems such as inclusion, equivalence, and minimization can be solved
efficiently. In this paper, we propose and investigate different notions of
"horizontal determinism", starting from automata for unranked trees in which
the horizontal evaluation is performed by finite state automata. We show that a
restriction to confluent horizontal evaluation leads to polynomial-time
emptiness and universality, but still suffers from coNP-completeness of the
emptiness of binary intersections. Finally, efficient algorithms can be
obtained by imposing an order of horizontal evaluation globally for all
automata in the class. Depending on the choice of the order, we obtain
different classes of automata, each of which has the same expressiveness as
CMso.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Preimage problems for deterministic finite automata
Given a subset of states of a deterministic finite automaton and a word
, the preimage is the subset of all states mapped to a state in by the
action of . We study three natural problems concerning words giving certain
preimages. The first problem is whether, for a given subset, there exists a
word \emph{extending} the subset (giving a larger preimage). The second problem
is whether there exists a \emph{totally extending} word (giving the whole set
of states as a preimage)---equivalently, whether there exists an
\emph{avoiding} word for the complementary subset. The third problem is whether
there exists a \emph{resizing} word. We also consider variants where the length
of the word is upper bounded, where the size of the given subset is restricted,
and where the automaton is strongly connected, synchronizing, or binary. We
conclude with a summary of the complexities in all combinations of the cases
- …