387 research outputs found
Beyond Language Equivalence on Visibly Pushdown Automata
We study (bi)simulation-like preorder/equivalence checking on the class of
visibly pushdown automata and its natural subclasses visibly BPA (Basic Process
Algebra) and visibly one-counter automata. We describe generic methods for
proving complexity upper and lower bounds for a number of studied preorders and
equivalences like simulation, completed simulation, ready simulation, 2-nested
simulation preorders/equivalences and bisimulation equivalence. Our main
results are that all the mentioned equivalences and preorders are
EXPTIME-complete on visibly pushdown automata, PSPACE-complete on visibly
one-counter automata and P-complete on visibly BPA. Our PSPACE lower bound for
visibly one-counter automata improves also the previously known DP-hardness
results for ordinary one-counter automata and one-counter nets. Finally, we
study regularity checking problems for visibly pushdown automata and show that
they can be decided in polynomial time.Comment: Final version of paper, accepted by LMC
Branching Bisimilarity of Normed BPA Processes is in NEXPTIME
Branching bisimilarity on normed BPA processes was recently shown to be
decidable by Yuxi Fu (ICALP 2013) but his proof has not provided any upper
complexity bound. We present a simpler approach based on relative prime
decompositions that leads to a nondeterministic exponential-time algorithm;
this is close to the known exponential-time lower bound.Comment: This is the same text as in July 2014, but only with some
acknowledgment added due to administrative need
Equivalence of Deterministic One-Counter Automata is NL-complete
We prove that language equivalence of deterministic one-counter automata is
NL-complete. This improves the superpolynomial time complexity upper bound
shown by Valiant and Paterson in 1975. Our main contribution is to prove that
two deterministic one-counter automata are inequivalent if and only if they can
be distinguished by a word of length polynomial in the size of the two input
automata
Decidability of a temporal logic problem for Petri nets
AbstractThe paper solves an open problem from [4] by showing a decision algorithm for a temporal logic language L(Q′, GF). It implies the decidability of the problem of the existence of an infinite weakly fair occurence sequence for a given Petri net; thereby an open problem from [2] is solved
Game Characterization of Probabilistic Bisimilarity, and Applications to Pushdown Automata
We study the bisimilarity problem for probabilistic pushdown automata (pPDA)
and subclasses thereof. Our definition of pPDA allows both probabilistic and
non-deterministic branching, generalising the classical notion of pushdown
automata (without epsilon-transitions). We first show a general
characterization of probabilistic bisimilarity in terms of two-player games,
which naturally reduces checking bisimilarity of probabilistic labelled
transition systems to checking bisimilarity of standard (non-deterministic)
labelled transition systems. This reduction can be easily implemented in the
framework of pPDA, allowing to use known results for standard
(non-probabilistic) PDA and their subclasses. A direct use of the reduction
incurs an exponential increase of complexity, which does not matter in deriving
decidability of bisimilarity for pPDA due to the non-elementary complexity of
the problem. In the cases of probabilistic one-counter automata (pOCA), of
probabilistic visibly pushdown automata (pvPDA), and of probabilistic basic
process algebras (i.e., single-state pPDA) we show that an implicit use of the
reduction can avoid the complexity increase; we thus get PSPACE, EXPTIME, and
2-EXPTIME upper bounds, respectively, like for the respective non-probabilistic
versions. The bisimilarity problems for OCA and vPDA are known to have matching
lower bounds (thus being PSPACE-complete and EXPTIME-complete, respectively);
we show that these lower bounds also hold for fully probabilistic versions that
do not use non-determinism
Bisimulation Equivalence of First-Order Grammars is ACKERMANN-Complete
Checking whether two pushdown automata with restricted silent actions are
weakly bisimilar was shown decidable by S\'enizergues (1998, 2005). We provide
the first known complexity upper bound for this famous problem, in the
equivalent setting of first-order grammars. This ACKERMANN upper bound is
optimal, and we also show that strong bisimilarity is primitive-recursive when
the number of states of the automata is fixed
On the Home-Space Problem for Petri Nets and its Ackermannian Complexity
A set of configurations H is a home-space for a set of configurations X of a
Petri net if every configuration reachable from (any configuration in) X can
reach (some configuration in) H. The semilinear home-space problem for Petri
nets asks, given a Petri net and semilinear sets of configurations X, H, if H
is a home-space for X. In 1989, David de Frutos Escrig and Colette Johnen
proved that the problem is decidable when X is a singleton and H is a finite
union of linear sets with the same periods. In this paper, we show that the
general (semilinear) problem is decidable. This result is obtained by proving a
duality between the reachability problem and the non-home-space problem. In
particular, we prove that for any Petri net and any semilinear set of
configurations H we can effectively compute a semilinear set C of
configurations, called a non-reachability core for H, such that for every set X
the set H is not a home-space for X if, and only if, C is reachable from X. We
show that the established relation to the reachability problem yields the
Ackermann-completeness of the (semilinear) home-space problem. For this we also
show that, given a Petri net with an initial marking, the set of minimal
reachable markings can be constructed in Ackermannian time
- …