Path planning algorithms for autonomous navigation of a non-holonomic robot in unstructured environments

openPath planning is a crucial aspect of autonomous robot navigation, enabling robots to efficiently and safely navigate through complex environments. This thesis focuses on autonomous navigation for robots in dynamic and uncertain environments. In particular, the project aims to analyze the localization and path planning problems. A fundamental review of the existing literature on path planning algorithms has been carried on. Various factors affecting path planning, such as sensor data fusion, map representation, and motion constraints, are also analyzed. Thanks to the collaboration with E80 Group S.p.A., the project has been developed using ROS (Robot Operating System) on a Clearpath Dingo-O, an indoor mobile robot. To address the challenges posed by unstructured and dynamic environments, ROS follows a combined approach of using a global planner and a local planner. The global planner generates a high-level path, considering the overall environment, while the local planner handles real-time adjustments to avoid moving obstacles and optimize the trajectory. This thesis describes the role of the global planner in a ROS-framework. Performance benchmarking of traditional algorithms like Dijkstra and A*, as well as other techniques, is fundamental in order to understand the limits of these methods. In the end, the Hybrid A* algorithm is introduced as a promising approach for addressing the issues of unstructured environments for autonomous navigation of a non-holonomic robot. The core concepts and implementation details of the algorithm are discussed, emphasizing its ability to efficiently explore continuous state spaces and generate drivable paths.The effectiveness of the proposed path planning algorithms is evaluated through extensive simulations and real-world experiments using the mobile platform. Performance metrics such as path length, execution time, and collision avoidance are analyzed to assess the efficiency and reliability of the algorithms.Path planning is a crucial aspect of autonomous robot navigation, enabling robots to efficiently and safely navigate through complex environments. This thesis focuses on autonomous navigation for robots in dynamic and uncertain environments. In particular, the project aims to analyze the localization and path planning problems. A fundamental review of the existing literature on path planning algorithms has been carried on. Various factors affecting path planning, such as sensor data fusion, map representation, and motion constraints, are also analyzed. Thanks to the collaboration with E80 Group S.p.A., the project has been developed using ROS (Robot Operating System) on a Clearpath Dingo-O, an indoor mobile robot. To address the challenges posed by unstructured and dynamic environments, ROS follows a combined approach of using a global planner and a local planner. The global planner generates a high-level path, considering the overall environment, while the local planner handles real-time adjustments to avoid moving obstacles and optimize the trajectory. This thesis describes the role of the global planner in a ROS-framework. Performance benchmarking of traditional algorithms like Dijkstra and A*, as well as other techniques, is fundamental in order to understand the limits of these methods. In the end, the Hybrid A* algorithm is introduced as a promising approach for addressing the issues of unstructured environments for autonomous navigation of a non-holonomic robot. The core concepts and implementation details of the algorithm are discussed, emphasizing its ability to efficiently explore continuous state spaces and generate drivable paths.The effectiveness of the proposed path planning algorithms is evaluated through extensive simulations and real-world experiments using the mobile platform. Performance metrics such as path length, execution time, and collision avoidance are analyzed to assess the efficiency and reliability of the algorithms

A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications

[EN] Humanoid robots, unmanned rovers, entertainment pets, drones, and so on are great examples of mobile robots. They can be distinguished from other robots by their ability to move autonomously, with enough intelligence to react and make decisions based on the perception they receive from the environment. Mobile robots must have some source of input data, some way of decoding that input, and a way of taking actions (including its own motion) to respond to a changing world. The need to sense and adapt to an unknown environment requires a powerful cognition system. Nowadays, there are mobile robots that can walk, run, jump, and so on like their biological counterparts. Several fields of robotics have arisen, such as wheeled mobile robots, legged robots, flying robots, robot vision, artificial intelligence, and so on, which involve different technological areas such as mechanics, electronics, and computer science. In this article, the world of mobile robots is explored including the new trends. These new trends are led by artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, network communication, cooperative work, nanorobotics, friendly human-robot interfaces, safe human-robot interaction, and emotion expression and perception. Furthermore, these news trends are applied to different fields such as medicine, health care, sports, ergonomics, industry, distribution of goods, and service robotics. These tendencies will keep going their evolution in the coming years.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, which has funded the DPI2013-44227-R project.Rubio Montoya, FJ.; Valero Chuliá, FJ.; Llopis Albert, C. (2019). A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 16(2):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419839596S122162Brunete, A., Ranganath, A., Segovia, S., de Frutos, J. P., Hernando, M., & Gambao, E. (2017). Current trends in reconfigurable modular robots design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 14(3), 172988141771045. doi:10.1177/1729881417710457Bajracharya, M., Maimone, M. W., & Helmick, D. (2008). Autonomy for Mars Rovers: Past, Present, and Future. Computer, 41(12), 44-50. doi:10.1109/mc.2008.479Carsten, J., Rankin, A., Ferguson, D., & Stentz, A. (2007). Global Path Planning on Board the Mars Exploration Rovers. 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference. doi:10.1109/aero.2007.352683Grotzinger, J. P., Crisp, J., Vasavada, A. R., Anderson, R. C., Baker, C. J., Barry, R., … Wiens, R. C. (2012). Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 5-56. doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2Khatib, O., Yeh, X., Brantner, G., Soe, B., Kim, B., Ganguly, S., … Creuze, V. (2016). Ocean One: A Robotic Avatar for Oceanic Discovery. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(4), 20-29. doi:10.1109/mra.2016.2613281Ceccarelli, M. (2012). Notes for a History of Grasping Devices. Mechanisms and Machine Science, 3-16. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4664-3_1Campion, G., & Chung, W. (2008). Wheeled Robots. Springer Handbook of Robotics, 391-410. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_18Ferriere, L., Raucent, B., & Campion, G. (s. f.). Design of omnimobile robot wheels. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1996.509271Campion, G., Bastin, G., & Dandrea-Novel, B. (1996). Structural properties and classification of kinematic and dynamic models of wheeled mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(1), 47-62. doi:10.1109/70.481750Bałchanowski, J. (2012). Mobile Wheel-Legged Robot: Researching of Suspension Leveling System. Mechanisms and Machine Science, 3-12. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5125-5_1Williams, R. L., Carter, B. E., Gallina, P., & Rosati, G. (2002). Dynamic model with slip for wheeled omnidirectional robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(3), 285-293. doi:10.1109/tra.2002.1019459Chan, R. P. M., Stol, K. A., & Halkyard, C. R. (2013). Review of modelling and control of two-wheeled robots. Annual Reviews in Control, 37(1), 89-103. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.03.004Kim, H., & Kim, B. K. (2014). Online Minimum-Energy Trajectory Planning and Control on a Straight-Line Path for Three-Wheeled Omnidirectional Mobile Robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(9), 4771-4779. doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2293706Carbone, G., & Ceccarelli, M. (2005). Legged Robotic Systems. Cutting Edge Robotics. doi:10.5772/4669Chestnutt, J., Lau, M., Cheung, G., Kuffner, J., Hodgins, J., & Kanade, T. (s. f.). Footstep Planning for the Honda ASIMO Humanoid. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.2005.1570188Arikawa, K., & Hirose, S. (s. f.). Development of quadruped walking robot TITAN-VIII. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS ’96. doi:10.1109/iros.1996.570670Kurazume, R., Byong-won, A., Ohta, K., & Hasegawa, T. (s. f.). Experimental study on energy efficiency for quadruped walking vehicles. Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453). doi:10.1109/iros.2003.1250697Hirose, S., Fukuda, Y., Yoneda, K., Nagakubo, A., Tsukagoshi, H., Arikawa, K., … Hodoshima, R. (2009). Quadruped walking robots at Tokyo Institute of Technology. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 16(2), 104-114. doi:10.1109/mra.2009.932524Stoica, A., Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M., & Pisla, D. (2010). Cassino Hexapod : Experiences and new leg design. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR). doi:10.1109/aqtr.2010.5520756Bares, J. E., & Wettergreen, D. S. (1999). Dante II: Technical Description, Results, and Lessons Learned. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(7), 621-649. doi:10.1177/02783649922066475Schiele, A., Romstedt, J., Lee, C., Henkel, H., Klinkner, S., Bertrand, R., … Michaelis, H. (2008). NanoKhod Exploration Rover - A Rugged Rover Suited for Small, Low-Cost, Planetary Lander Mission. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 15(2), 96-107. doi:10.1109/mra.2008.917888Takayama, T., & Hirose, S. (2003). Development of Souryu I & II -Connected Crawler Vehicle for Inspection of Narrow and Winding Space. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 15(1), 61-69. doi:10.20965/jrm.2003.p0061Cuesta, F., & Ollero, A. (2005). Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. doi:10.1007/b14079Ohya, I., Kosaka, A., & Kak, A. (1998). Vision-based navigation by a mobile robot with obstacle avoidance using single-camera vision and ultrasonic sensing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(6), 969-978. doi:10.1109/70.736780Desouza, G. N., & Kak, A. C. (2002). Vision for mobile robot navigation: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(2), 237-267. doi:10.1109/34.982903Borenstein, J., Everett, H. R., Feng, L., & Wehe, D. (1997). Mobile robot positioning: Sensors and techniques. Journal of Robotic Systems, 14(4), 231-249. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4563(199704)14:43.0.co;2-rBetke, M., & Gurvits, L. (1997). Mobile robot localization using landmarks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 13(2), 251-263. doi:10.1109/70.563647Kuffner, J., Nishiwaki, K., Kagami, S., Inaba, M., & Inoue, H. (2005). Motion Planning for Humanoid Robots. Robotics Research. The Eleventh International Symposium, 365-374. doi:10.1007/11008941_39Lee, Y.-J., & Bien, Z. (2002). Path planning for a quadruped robot: an artificial field approach. Advanced Robotics, 16(7), 609-627. doi:10.1163/15685530260390746Petres, C., Pailhas, Y., Patron, P., Petillot, Y., Evans, J., & Lane, D. (2007). Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(2), 331-341. doi:10.1109/tro.2007.895057P. Raja. (2012). Optimal path planning of mobile robots: A review. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 7(9). doi:10.5897/ijps11.1745Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968). A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 100-107. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136Lozano-Pérez, T., & Wesley, M. A. (1979). An algorithm for planning collision-free paths among polyhedral obstacles. Communications of the ACM, 22(10), 560-570. doi:10.1145/359156.359164Lozano-Perez. (1983). Spatial Planning: A Configuration Space Approach. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-32(2), 108-120. doi:10.1109/tc.1983.1676196Brooks, R. A. (1983). Solving the find-path problem by good representation of free space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(2), 190-197. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313112Schwartz, J. T., & Sharir, M. (1983). On the «piano movers» problem. II. General techniques for computing topological properties of real algebraic manifolds. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 4(3), 298-351. doi:10.1016/0196-8858(83)90014-3Kavraki LE. Random networks in configurations space for fast path planning. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1994.Kavraki, L. E., Latombe, J.-C., Motwani, R., & Raghavan, P. (1998). Randomized Query Processing in Robot Path Planning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 57(1), 50-60. doi:10.1006/jcss.1998.1578Hsu, D., Kindel, R., Latombe, J.-C., & Rock, S. (2002). Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 21(3), 233-255. doi:10.1177/027836402320556421Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996). Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(4), 566-580. doi:10.1109/70.508439Rubio, F., Valero, F., Sunyer, J., & Mata, V. (2009). Direct step‐by‐step method for industrial robot path planning. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 36(6), 594-607. doi:10.1108/01439910910994669Howard, T. M., & Kelly, A. (2007). Optimal Rough Terrain Trajectory Generation for Wheeled Mobile Robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 26(2), 141-166. doi:10.1177/0278364906075328Valero FJ. Planificación de trayectorias libres de obstáculos para un manipulador plano. Doctoral Thesis, UPV, Spain, 1990.Valero, F., Mata, V., Cuadrado, J. I., & Ceccarelli, M. (1996). A formulation for path planning of manipulators in complex environments by using adjacent configurations. Advanced Robotics, 11(1), 33-56. doi:10.1163/156855397x00038Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017Garcia, M. A. P., Montiel, O., Castillo, O., Sepúlveda, R., & Melin, P. (2009). Path planning for autonomous mobile robot navigation with ant colony optimization and fuzzy cost function evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 9(3), 1102-1110. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.02.014Miao, H., & Tian, Y.-C. (2013). Dynamic robot path planning using an enhanced simulated annealing approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 222, 420-437. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.07.022Bobrow, J. E., Dubowsky, S., & Gibson, J. S. (1985). Time-Optimal Control of Robotic Manipulators Along Specified Paths. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 4(3), 3-17. doi:10.1177/027836498500400301Kang Shin, & McKay, N. (1985). Minimum-time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(6), 531-541. doi:10.1109/tac.1985.1104009Kyriakopoulos, K. J., & Saridis, G. N. (s. f.). Minimum jerk path generation. Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1988.12075Constantinescu, D., & Croft, E. A. (2000). Smooth and time-optimal trajectory planning for industrial manipulators along specified paths. Journal of Robotic Systems, 17(5), 233-249. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4563(200005)17:53.0.co;2-yGasparetto, A., & Zanotto, V. (2010). Optimal trajectory planning for industrial robots. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(4), 548-556. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.11.001JIANGdagger, Z.-P., & NIJMEIJER, H. (1997). Tracking Control of Mobile Robots: A Case Study in Backstepping**This paper was not presented at any IFAC meeting. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Alberto Isidori under the direction of Editor Tamer Başar. Automatica, 33(7), 1393-1399. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(97)00055-1Klosowski, J. T., Held, M., Mitchell, J. S. B., Sowizral, H., & Zikan, K. (1998). Efficient collision detection using bounding volume hierarchies of k-DOPs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 4(1), 21-36. doi:10.1109/2945.675649Mirtich B. V-Clip: fast and robust polyhedral collision detection. Technical Report TR97-05, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory, 1997.Mohamed, E. F., El-Metwally, K., & Hanafy, A. R. (2011). An improved Tangent Bug method integrated with artificial potential field for multi-robot path planning. 2011 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. doi:10.1109/inista.2011.5946136Seder, M., & Petrovic, I. (2007). Dynamic window based approach to mobile robot motion control in the presence of moving obstacles. Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.2007.363613Simmons, R. (s. f.). The curvature-velocity method for local obstacle avoidance. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1996.51102

A Comprehensive Overview of Classical and Modern Route Planning Algorithms for Self-Driving Mobile Robots

Mobile robots are increasingly being applied in a variety of sectors, including agricultural, firefighting, and search and rescue operations. Robotics and autonomous technology research and development have played a major role in making this possible. Before a robot can reliably and effectively navigate a space without human aid, there are still several challenges to be addressed. When planning a path to its destination, the robot should be able to gather information from its surroundings and take the appropriate actions to avoid colliding with obstacles along the way. The following review analyses and compares 200 articles from two databases, Scopus and IEEE Xplore, and selects 60 articles as references from those articles. This evaluation focuses mostly on the accuracy of the different path-planning algorithms. Common collision-free path planning methodologies are examined in this paper, including classical or traditional and modern intelligence techniques, as well as both global and local approaches, in static and dynamic environments. Classical or traditional methods, such as Roadmaps (Visibility Graph and Voronoi Diagram), Potential Fields, and Cell Decomposition, and modern methodologies such as heuristic-based (Dijkstra Method, A* Algorithms, and D* Algorithms), metaheuristics algorithms (such as PSO, Bat Algorithm, ACO, and Genetic Algorithm), and neural systems such as fuzzy neural networks or fuzzy logic (FL) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are described in this report. In this study, we outline the ideas, benefits, and downsides of modeling and path-searching technologies for a mobile robot

Review of control algorithms for mobile robotics

This article presents a comprehensive review of control algorithms used in mobile robotics, a field in constant evolution. Mobile robotics has seen significant advances in recent years, driven by the demand for applications in various sectors, such as industrial automation, space exploration, and medical care. The review focuses on control algorithms that address specific challenges in navigation, localization, mapping, and path planning in changing and unknown environments. Classical approaches, such as PID control and methods based on classical control theory, as well as modern techniques, including deep learning and model-based planning, are discussed in detail. In addition, practical applications and remaining challenges in implementing these algorithms in real-world mobile robots are highlighted. Ultimately, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the diversity and complexity of control algorithms in mobile robotics, helping researchers and practitioners to better understand the options available to address specific problems in this exciting area of study.Comment: 8 pages, in Spanis

Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks

In this chapter, we present a literature survey of an emerging, cutting-edge, and multi-disciplinary field of research at the intersection of Robotics and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) which we refer to as Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks (RWSN). We define a RWSN as an autonomous networked multi-robot system that aims to achieve certain sensing goals while meeting and maintaining certain communication performance requirements, through cooperative control, learning and adaptation. While both of the component areas, i.e., Robotics and WSN, are very well-known and well-explored, there exist a whole set of new opportunities and research directions at the intersection of these two fields which are relatively or even completely unexplored. One such example would be the use of a set of robotic routers to set up a temporary communication path between a sender and a receiver that uses the controlled mobility to the advantage of packet routing. We find that there exist only a limited number of articles to be directly categorized as RWSN related works whereas there exist a range of articles in the robotics and the WSN literature that are also relevant to this new field of research. To connect the dots, we first identify the core problems and research trends related to RWSN such as connectivity, localization, routing, and robust flow of information. Next, we classify the existing research on RWSN as well as the relevant state-of-the-arts from robotics and WSN community according to the problems and trends identified in the first step. Lastly, we analyze what is missing in the existing literature, and identify topics that require more research attention in the future

Multirobot heterogeneous control considering secondary objectives

Cooperative robotics has considered tasks that are executed frequently, maintaining the shape and orientation of robotic systems when they fulfill a common objective, without taking advantage of the redundancy that the robotic group could present. This paper presents a proposal for controlling a group of terrestrial robots with heterogeneous characteristics, considering primary and secondary tasks thus that the group complies with the following of a path while modifying its shape and orientation at any time. The development of the proposal is achieved through the use of controllers based on linear algebra, propounding a low computational cost and high scalability algorithm. Likewise, the stability of the controller is analyzed to know the required features that have to be met by the control constants, that is, the correct values. Finally, experimental results are shown with di erent configurations and heterogeneous robots, where the graphics corroborate the expected operation of the proposalThis research was funded by Corporación Ecuatoriana para el Desarrollo de la Investigación y Academia–CEDI

Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Survey

With growing numbers of intelligent autonomous systems in human environments, the ability of such systems to perceive, understand and anticipate human behavior becomes increasingly important. Specifically, predicting future positions of dynamic agents and planning considering such predictions are key tasks for self-driving vehicles, service robots and advanced surveillance systems. This paper provides a survey of human motion trajectory prediction. We review, analyze and structure a large selection of work from different communities and propose a taxonomy that categorizes existing methods based on the motion modeling approach and level of contextual information used. We provide an overview of the existing datasets and performance metrics. We discuss limitations of the state of the art and outline directions for further research.Comment: Submitted to the International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), 37 page