Parametric linear programming and anti-cycling pivoting rules

Bibliography: p. 13.Support in part from the Systems Theory and Operations Research Division of the National Science Foundation. ECS-83/6224 Support in part by Presidential Young Investigator grant of the National Science Foundation. 8451517-ECSby T.L. Magnanti and J.B. Orlin

Parametric Linear Programming and Anti-Cycling Pivoting Rules

The traditional perturbution (or lexicographic) methods for resolving degeneracy in linear programming impose decision rules that eliminate ties in the simplex ratio rule and, therefore,restrict the choice of exiting basic variables. Bland's combinatorial pivoting rule also restricts the choice of exiting variables. Using ideas from parametric linear programming, we develop anti-cycling pivoting rules that do not limit the choice of exiting variables beyond the simplex ratio rule. That is, any variable that ties for the ratio rule can leave the basis. A similar approach gives pivoting rules for the dual simplex method that do not restrict the choice of entering variables

Criss-cross methods: A fresh view on pivot algorithms

Criss-cross methods are pivot algorithms that solve linear programming problems in one phase starting with any basic solution. The first finite criss-cross method was invented by Chang, Terlaky and Wang independently. Unlike the simplex method that follows a monotonic edge path on the feasible region, the trace of a criss-cross method is neither monotonic (with respect to the objective function) nor feasibility preserving. The main purpose of this paper is to present mathematical ideas and proof techniques behind finite criss-cross pivot methods. A recent result on the existence of a short admissible pivot path to an optimal basis is given, indicating shortest pivot paths from any basis might be indeed short for criss-cross type algorithms. The origins and the history of criss-cross methods are also touched upo

The existence of a strongly polynomial time simplex method

It is well known how to clarify whether there is a polynomial time simplex algorithm for linear programming (LP) is the most challenging open problem in optimization and discrete geometry. This paper gives a affirmative answer to this open question by the use of the parametric analysis technique that we recently proposed. We show that there is a simplex algorithm whose number of pivoting steps does not exceed the number of variables of a LP problem.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figur

Experiments with Active-Set LP Algorithms Allowing Basis Deficiency

n interesting question for linear programming (LP) algorithms is how to deal with solutions in which the number of nonzero variables is less than the number of rows of the matrix in standard form. An approach is that of basis deficiency-allowing (BDA) simplex variations, which work with a subset of independent columns of the coefficient matrix in standard form, wherein the basis is not necessarily represented by a square matrix. We describe one such algorithm with several variants. The research question deals with studying the computational behaviour by using small, extreme cases. For these instances, we must wonder which parameter setting or variants are more appropriate. We compare the setting of two nonsimplex active-set methods with Holmström’s TomLab LpSimplex v3.0 commercial sparse primal simplex commercial implementation. All of them update a sparse QR factorization in Matlab. The first two implementations require fewer iterations and provide better solution quality and running time.This work has been funded by grant PID2021-123278OB-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. Partial funding for open access charge: Universidad de Málag

Criss-cross methods: a fresh view on pivot algorithms

Criss-cross methods are pivot algorithms that solve linear programming problems in one phase starting with any basic solution. The first finite criss-cross method was invented by Chang, Terlaky and Wang independently. Unlike the simplex method that follows a monotonic edge path on the feasible region, the trace of a criss-cross method is neither monotonic (with respect to the objective function) nor feasibility preserving. The main purpose of this paper is to present mathematical ideas and proof techniques behind finite criss-cross pivot methods. A recent result on the existence of a short admissible pivot path to an optimal basis is given, indicating shortest pivot paths from any basis might be indeed short for criss-cross type algorithms. The origins and the history of criss-cross methods are also touched upon

Row generation techniques for approximate solution of linear programming problems

Ankara : The Department of Industrial Engineering and the Institute of Engineering and Science of Bilkent University, 2010.Thesis (Master's) -- Bilkent University, 2010.Includes bibliographical references leaves 69-77.In this study, row generation techniques are applied on general linear programming problems with a very large number of constraints with respect to the problem dimension. A lower bound is obtained for the change in the objective value caused by the generation of a specific row. To achieve row selection that results in a large shift in the feasible region and the objective value at each row generation iteration, the lower bound is used in the comparison of row generation candidates. For a warm-start to the solution procedure, an effective selection of the subset of constraints that constitutes the initial LP is considered. Several strategies are discussed to form such a small subset of constraints so as to obtain an initial solution close to the feasible region of the original LP. Approximation schemes are designed and compared to make possible the termination of row generation at a solution in the proximity of an optimal solution of the input LP. The row generation algorithm presented in this study, which is enhanced with a warm-start strategy and an approximation scheme is implemented and tested for computation time and the number of rows generated. Two efficient primal simplex method variants are used for benchmarking computation times, and the row generation algorithm appears to perform better than at least one of them especially when number of constraints is large.Paç, A BurakM.S

Two dimensional search algorithms for linear programming

Linear programming is one of the most important classes of optimization problems. These mathematical models have been used by academics and practitioners to solve numerous real world applications. Quickly solving linear programs impacts decision makers from both the public and private sectors. Substantial research has been performed to solve this class of problems faster, and the vast majority of the solution techniques can be categorized as one dimensional search algorithms. That is, these methods successively move from one solution to another solution by solving a one dimensional subspace linear program at each iteration. This dissertation proposes novel algorithms that move between solutions by repeatedly solving a two dimensional subspace linear program. Computational experiments demonstrate the potential of these newly developed algorithms and show an average improvement of nearly 25% in solution time when compared to the corresponding one dimensional search version. This dissertation\u27s research creates the core concept of these two dimensional search algorithms, which is a fast technique to determine an optimal basis and an optimal solution to linear programs with only two variables. This method, called the slope algorithm, compares the slope formed by the objective function with the slope formed by each constraint to determine a pair of constraints that intersect at an optimal basis and an optimal solution. The slope algorithm is implemented within a simplex framework to perform two dimensional searches. This results in the double pivot simplex method. Differently than the well-known simplex method, the double pivot simplex method simultaneously pivots up to two basic variables with two nonbasic variables at each iteration. The theoretical computational complexity of the double pivot simplex method is identical to the simplex method. Computational results show that this new algorithm reduces the number of pivots to solve benchmark instances by approximately 40% when compared to the classical implementation of the simplex method, and 20% when compared to the primal simplex implementation of CPLEX, a high performance mathematical programming solver. Solution times of some random linear programs are also improved by nearly 25% on average. This dissertation also presents a novel technique, called the ratio algorithm, to find an optimal basis and an optimal solution to linear programs with only two constraints. When the ratio algorithm is implemented within a simplex framework to perform two dimensional searches, it results in the double pivot dual simplex method. In this case, the double pivot dual simplex method behaves similarly to the dual simplex method, but two variables are exchanged at every step. Two dimensional searches are also implemented within an interior point framework. This dissertation creates a set of four two dimensional search interior point algorithms derived from primal and dual affine scaling and logarithmic barrier search directions. Each iteration of these techniques quickly solves a two dimensional subspace linear program formed by the intersection of two search directions and the feasible region of the linear program. Search directions are derived by orthogonally partitioning the objective function vector, which allows these novel methods to improve the objective function value at each step by at least as much as the corresponding one dimensional search version. Computational experiments performed on benchmark linear programs demonstrate that these two dimensional search interior point algorithms improve the average solution time by approximately 12% and the average number of iterations by 15%. In conclusion, this dissertation provides a change of paradigm in linear programming optimization algorithms. Implementing two dimensional searches within both a simplex and interior point framework typically reduces the computational time and number of iterations to solve linear programs. Furthermore, this dissertation sets the stage for future research topics in multidimensional search algorithms to solve not only linear programs but also other critical classes of optimization methods. Consequently, this dissertation\u27s research can become one of the first steps to change how commercial and open source mathematical programming software will solve optimization problems