Plug and Play Robust Distributed Control with Ellipsoidal Parametric Uncertainty System

We consider a continuous linear time invariant system with ellipsoidal parametric uncertainty structured into subsystems. Since the design of a local controller uses only information on a subsystem and its neighbours, we combine the plug and play idea and robust distributed control to propose one distributed control strategy for linear system with ellipsoidal parametric uncertainty. Firstly for linear system with ellipsoidal parametric uncertainty, a necessary and sufficient condition for robust state feedback control is proposed by means of linear matrix inequality. If this necessary and sufficient condition is satisfied, this robust state feedback gain matrix can be easily derived to guarantee robust stability and prescribed closed loop performance. Secondly the plug and play idea is introduced in the design process. Finally by one example of aircraft flutter model parameter identification, the efficiency of the proposed control strategy can be easily realized

Robust control of systems with real parameter uncertainty and unmodelled dynamics

During this research period we have made significant progress in the four proposed areas: (1) design of robust controllers via H infinity optimization; (2) design of robust controllers via mixed H2/H infinity optimization; (3) M-delta structure and robust stability analysis for structured uncertainties; and (4) a study on controllability and observability of perturbed plant. It is well known now that the two-Riccati-equation solution to the H infinity control problem can be used to characterize all possible stabilizing optimal or suboptimal H infinity controllers if the optimal H infinity norm or gamma, an upper bound of a suboptimal H infinity norm, is given. In this research, we discovered some useful properties of these H infinity Riccati solutions. Among them, the most prominent one is that the spectral radius of the product of these two Riccati solutions is a continuous, nonincreasing, convex function of gamma in the domain of interest. Based on these properties, quadratically convergent algorithms are developed to compute the optimal H infinity norm. We also set up a detailed procedure for applying the H infinity theory to robust control systems design. The desire to design controllers with H infinity robustness but H(exp 2) performance has recently resulted in mixed H(exp 2) and H infinity control problem formulation. The mixed H(exp 2)/H infinity problem have drawn the attention of many investigators. However, solution is only available for special cases of this problem. We formulated a relatively realistic control problem with H(exp 2) performance index and H infinity robustness constraint into a more general mixed H(exp 2)/H infinity problem. No optimal solution yet is available for this more general mixed H(exp 2)/H infinity problem. Although the optimal solution for this mixed H(exp 2)/H infinity control has not yet been found, we proposed a design approach which can be used through proper choice of the available design parameters to influence both robustness and performance. For a large class of linear time-invariant systems with real parametric perturbations, the coefficient vector of the characteristic polynomial is a multilinear function of the real parameter vector. Based on this multilinear mapping relationship together with the recent developments for polytopic polynomials and parameter domain partition technique, we proposed an iterative algorithm for coupling the real structured singular value

A Quantitative Feedback Theory FCS Design for the Subsonic Envelope of the Vista F-16 Including Configuration Variation and Aerodynamic Control Effector Failures

Fault tolerant flight control systems for combat aircraft are an alternative to excessively redundant aircraft designs or reconfigurable control laws. However, due to the range of flight conditions within a combat aircraft\u27s operational flight envelope, the variety of its configurations, and the unavailability of an aerodynamic data base for damaged aircraft, designing fault tolerant systems is a complicated endeavor. Quantitative Feedback Theory is a robust control design technique especially well-suited to manage the structured parametric uncertainty inherent in this problem, and consequently is applied as the primary design tool for this research. Furthermore, realistic failure models are developed for the VISTA F-16 and physical saturation constraints are applied to the control effectors. The ensuing fault tolerant design is subjected to realistic control inputs and validated with the applicable MILSTD specifications

An application of mu-synthesis for control of a small air vehicle and simulation results

This paper discusses a nonlinear robust control design procedure to micro air vehicle that combines the singular value (µ) and µ-synthesis technique, which overcomes structured uncertainty of the control plant and is valid over the entire flight envelope. The uncertainty model consists with multiplicative plug-in dynamics disturbances and parametric uncertainty. The uncertainty is conducted with the aircraft aerodynamics characteristics and parameters. These uncertainties are bounded in size based on wind tunnel experiments, flight test and analytical calculations. Furthermore, these investigations allow us to obtain the linearized model of the aircraft called here nominal model

Dynamical Analysis and Robust Control Synthesis for Water Treatment Processes

Nowadays, water demand and water scarcity are very urgent issues due to population growth, drought and poor water quality all over the world. Therefore, water treatment plants are playing a vital role for good living condition of human. Water area needs more concentration study to increase water productivity and decrease water cost. This dissertation presents the analysis and control of water treatment plants using robust control techniques. The applied control algorithms include H∞, gain scheduled and observer-based loop-shaping control technique. They are modern control algorithms and very powerful in robust controlling of systems with uncertainties and disturbances. The water treatment plants include a desalination system and a wastewater process. Since fresh water scarcity is getting more serious, the desalination plants are to produce drinking water and wastewater treatment plants give the reusable water. The desalination system is a RO one used to produce drinking water from seawater and brackish water. The nonlinear behaviors of this system is carefully analyzed before the linearization. Due to the uncertainty caused by concentration polarization, the system is linearized using linear state-space parametric uncertainty framework. The system also suffer from many disturbances which water hammer is one of the most influential one. The mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis control algorithm is applied to control the RO system coping with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises. The wastewater treatment process is an activated sludge process. This biological process use microorganisms to convert organic and certain inorganic matter from wastewater into cell mass. The process is very complex with many coupled biological and chemical reactions. Due to the large variation in the influent flow, the system is modelized and linearized as a linear parametric varying system using affine parameter-dependent representation. Since the influent flow is quickly variable and easily to be measured, the robust gain scheduled robust controller is applied to deal with the large uncertainty caused by the scheduled parameter. This control algorithm often gives better performances than those of general robust H∞ one. In the wastewater treatment plant, there exist an anaerobic digestion, which is controlled by the observer-based loop-shaping algorithm. The simulations show that all the controllers can effectively deal with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises in water treatment plants. They help improve the system performances and safeties, save energy and reduce product water costs. The studies contribute some potential control approaches for water treatment plants, which is currently a very active research area in the world.Contents ······················································································· iv List of Tables ··············································································· viii List of Figures ··············································································· ix Chapter 1. Introduction ···································································· 1 1.1 Reverse osmosis process ···································································· 2 1.2 Activated sludge process ···································································· 6 1.3 Robust H∞ and gain scheduling control ··················································· 10 Chapter 2. Robust H∞ controller ······················································· 13 2.1 Introduction ·················································································· 13 2.2 Uncertainty modelling ······································································ 13 2.2.1 Unstructured uncertainties ···························································· 14 2.2.2 Parametric uncertainties ······························································· 15 2.2.3 Structured uncertainties ································································ 16 2.2.4 Linear fractional transformation ······················································ 16 2.3 Stability criterion ············································································ 17 2.3.1 Small gain theorem ····································································· 17 2.3.2 Structured singular value (muy) synthesis brief definition ·························· 19 2.4 Robustness analysis and controller design ··············································· 20 2.4.1 Forming generalised plant and N-delta structure ····································· 20 2.4.2 Robustness analysis ···································································· 24 2.5 Reduced controller ·········································································· 26 2.5.1 Truncation ··············································································· 27 2.5.2 Residualization ········································································· 29 2.5.3 Balanced realization···································································· 29 2.5.4 Optimal Hankel norm approximation ················································ 31 Chapter 3. Robust gain scheduling controller ······································· 37 3.1 Introduction ·················································································· 37 3.2 Linear parameter varying (LPV) system ·················································· 39 3.3 Matrix Polytope ·············································································· 40 3.4 Polytope and affine parameter-dependent representation ······························· 41 3.4.1 Polytope representation ································································ 41 3.4.2 Affine parameter-dependent representation ········································· 42 3.5 Quadratic stability of LPV systems and quadratic (robust) H∞ performance ········· 43 3.6 Robust gain scheduling ····································································· 44 3.6.1 LPV system linearization ······························································ 44 3.6.2 Polytope-based gain scheduling ······················································ 45 3.6.3 LFT-based gain scheduling ··························································· 48 Chapter 4. Mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis controller applied for a reverse osmosis desalination system ····························································· 52 4.1 RO principles ················································································ 52 4.1.1 Osmosis and reverse osmosis ························································· 52 4.1.2 Dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration ········································ 53 4.2 Membranes ··················································································· 54 4.2.1 Structure and material ································································· 54 4.2.2 Hollow fine fiber membrane module ················································ 55 4.2.3 Spiral wound membrane module ····················································· 57 4.3 Nonlinear RO modelling and analysis ···················································· 58 4.3.1 RO system introduction ······························································· 58 4.3.2 Modelling ··············································································· 60 4.3.3 Nonlinear analysis ······································································ 62 4.3.4 Concentration polarization ···························································· 64 4.4 Water hammer phenomenon ······························································· 66 4.4.1 Water hammer, column separation and vaporous cavitation ······················ 66 4.4.2 Water hammer analysis and simulation ·············································· 69 4.4.3 Prevention of water hammer effect··················································· 78 4.5 RO linearization ············································································· 79 4.5.1 Nominal linearization ·································································· 79 4.5.2 Uncertainty modeling ·································································· 81 4.5.3 Parametric uncertainty linearization ················································· 83 4.6 Robust H∞ controller design for RO system ·············································· 85 4.6.1 Control of uncertain RO system ······················································ 85 4.6.2 Robustness analysis and H∞ controller design ······································ 86 4.7 Simulation result and discussion··························································· 90 4.8 Conclusion ··················································································· 95 Chapter 5. Robust gain scheduling control of activated sludge process ······· 96 5.1 Introduction about activated sludge process ············································· 96 5.1.1 State variables ·········································································· 98 5.1.2 ASM1 processes ······································································ 100 5.1.3 The control problem of activated sludge process ································· 102 5.2 System modelling ········································································· 104 5.3 Model linearization ········································································ 107 5.4 Robust gain-schedule controller design for activated sludge process ··············· 109 5.5 Simulation result and discussion························································· 115 5.6 Conclusion ················································································· 120 Chapter 6. Observer-based loop-shaping control of anaerobic digestion ···· 121 6.1 Introduction ················································································ 121 6.1.1 Control problem in anaerobic digestion ··········································· 122 6.2 System modelling ········································································· 123 6.3 Controller design ·········································································· 124 6.3.1 H∞ loop-shaping controller ························································· 125 6.3.2 Coprime factor uncertainty ·························································· 126 6.3.3 Control synthesis ····································································· 127 6.4 Simulation result ··········································································· 131 6.5 Conclusion ················································································· 133 Chapter 7. Conclusion ··································································· 134 References ·················································································· 136 Appendices ················································································· 144Docto

Stability and Performance Analysis of Systems Under Constraints

All real world control systems must deal with actuator and state constraints. Standard conic sector bounded nonlinearity stability theory provides methods for analyzing the stability and performance of systems under constraints, but it is well-known that these conditions can be very conservative. A method is developed to reduce conservatism in the analysis of constraints by representing them as nonlinear real parametric uncertainty

Crone control of a nonlinear hydraulic actuator

The CRONE control (fractional robust control) of a hydraulic actuator whose dynamic model is nonlinear is presented. An input-output linearization under diffeomorphism and feedback is first achieved for the nominal plant. The relevance of this linearization when the parameters of the plant vary is then analyzed using the Volterra input-output representation in the frequency domain. CRONE control based on complex fractional differentiation is finally applied to control the velocity of the input-output linearized model when parametric variations occur