7,212 research outputs found
The complexity of weighted boolean #CSP*
This paper gives a dichotomy theorem for the complexity of computing the partition
function of an instance of a weighted Boolean constraint satisfaction problem. The problem
is parameterized by a finite set F of nonnegative functions that may be used to assign weights to
the configurations (feasible solutions) of a problem instance. Classical constraint satisfaction problems
correspond to the special case of 0,1-valued functions. We show that computing the partition
function, i.e., the sum of the weights of all configurations, is FP#P-complete unless either (1) every
function in F is of “product type,” or (2) every function in F is “pure affine.” In the remaining cases,
computing the partition function is in P
Constraint satisfaction parameterized by solution size
In the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) corresponding to a constraint
language (i.e., a set of relations) , the goal is to find an assignment
of values to variables so that a given set of constraints specified by
relations from is satisfied. The complexity of this problem has
received substantial amount of attention in the past decade. In this paper we
study the fixed-parameter tractability of constraint satisfaction problems
parameterized by the size of the solution in the following sense: one of the
possible values, say 0, is "free," and the number of variables allowed to take
other, "expensive," values is restricted. A size constraint requires that
exactly variables take nonzero values. We also study a more refined version
of this restriction: a global cardinality constraint prescribes how many
variables have to be assigned each particular value. We study the parameterized
complexity of these types of CSPs where the parameter is the required number
of nonzero variables. As special cases, we can obtain natural and
well-studied parameterized problems such as Independent Set, Vertex Cover,
d-Hitting Set, Biclique, etc.
In the case of constraint languages closed under substitution of constants,
we give a complete characterization of the fixed-parameter tractable cases of
CSPs with size constraints, and we show that all the remaining problems are
W[1]-hard. For CSPs with cardinality constraints, we obtain a similar
classification, but for some of the problems we are only able to show that they
are Biclique-hard. The exact parameterized complexity of the Biclique problem
is a notorious open problem, although it is believed to be W[1]-hard.Comment: To appear in SICOMP. Conference version in ICALP 201
Relating the Time Complexity of Optimization Problems in Light of the Exponential-Time Hypothesis
Obtaining lower bounds for NP-hard problems has for a long time been an
active area of research. Recent algebraic techniques introduced by Jonsson et
al. (SODA 2013) show that the time complexity of the parameterized SAT()
problem correlates to the lattice of strong partial clones. With this ordering
they isolated a relation such that SAT() can be solved at least as fast
as any other NP-hard SAT() problem. In this paper we extend this method
and show that such languages also exist for the max ones problem
(MaxOnes()) and the Boolean valued constraint satisfaction problem over
finite-valued constraint languages (VCSP()). With the help of these
languages we relate MaxOnes and VCSP to the exponential time hypothesis in
several different ways.Comment: This is an extended version of Relating the Time Complexity of
Optimization Problems in Light of the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, appearing
in Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Mathematical
Foundations of Computer Science MFCS 2014 Budapest, August 25-29, 201
Parameterized Complexity Classification for Interval Constraints
Constraint satisfaction problems form a nicely behaved class of problems that
lends itself to complexity classification results. From the point of view of
parameterized complexity, a natural task is to classify the parameterized
complexity of MinCSP problems parameterized by the number of unsatisfied
constraints. In other words, we ask whether we can delete at most
constraints, where is the parameter, to get a satisfiable instance. In this
work, we take a step towards classifying the parameterized complexity for an
important infinite-domain CSP: Allen's interval algebra (IA). This CSP has
closed intervals with rational endpoints as domain values and employs a set
of 13 basic comparison relations such as ``precedes'' or ``during'' for
relating intervals. IA is a highly influential and well-studied formalism
within AI and qualitative reasoning that has numerous applications in, for
instance, planning, natural language processing and molecular biology. We
provide an FPT vs. W[1]-hard dichotomy for MinCSP for all . IA is sometimes extended with unions of the relations in or
first-order definable relations over , but extending our results to these
cases would require first solving the parameterized complexity of Directed
Symmetric Multicut, which is a notorious open problem. Already in this limited
setting, we uncover connections to new variants of graph cut and separation
problems. This includes hardness proofs for simultaneous cuts or feedback arc
set problems in directed graphs, as well as new tractable cases with algorithms
based on the recently introduced flow augmentation technique. Given the
intractability of MinCSP in general, we then consider (parameterized)
approximation algorithms and present a factor- fpt-approximation algorithm
Limits of Preprocessing
We present a first theoretical analysis of the power of polynomial-time
preprocessing for important combinatorial problems from various areas in AI. We
consider problems from Constraint Satisfaction, Global Constraints,
Satisfiability, Nonmonotonic and Bayesian Reasoning. We show that, subject to a
complexity theoretic assumption, none of the considered problems can be reduced
by polynomial-time preprocessing to a problem kernel whose size is polynomial
in a structural problem parameter of the input, such as induced width or
backdoor size. Our results provide a firm theoretical boundary for the
performance of polynomial-time preprocessing algorithms for the considered
problems.Comment: This is a slightly longer version of a paper that appeared in the
proceedings of AAAI 201
- …