Effects Comparison of Different Resilience Enhancing Strategies for Municipal Water Distribution Network: A Multidimensional Approach

Water distribution network (WDN) is critical to the city service, economic rehabilitation, public health, and safety. Reconstructing the WDN to improve its resilience in seismic disaster is an important and ongoing issue. Although a considerable body of research has examined the effects of different reconstruction strategies on seismic resistance, it is still hard for decision-makers to choose optimal resilience enhancing strategy. Taking the pipeline ductile retrofitting and network meshed expansion as demonstration, we proposed a feasible framework to contrast the resilience enhancing effects of two reconstruction strategies—units retrofitting strategy and network optimization strategy—in technical and organizational dimension. We also developed a new performance response function (PRF) which is based on network equilibrium theory to conduct the effects comparison in integrated technical and organizational dimension. Through the case study of municipal WDN in Lianyungang, China, the comparison results were thoroughly shown and the holistic decision-making support was provided

Improving the resilience of post-disaster water distribution systems using a dynamic optimization framework

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Improving the resilience of water distribution systems (WDSs) to handle natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes) is a critical step towards sustainable urban water management. This requires the water utility to be able to respond quickly to such disaster events and in an organized manner, to prioritize the use of available resources to restore service rapidly whilst minimizing the negative impacts. Many methods have been developed to evaluate the WDS resilience, but few efforts are made so far to improve resilience of a post-disaster WDS through identifying optimal sequencing of recovery actions. To address this gap, a new dynamic optimization framework is proposed here where the resilience of a post-disaster WDS is evaluated using six different metrics. A tailored Genetic Algorithm is developed to solve the complex optimization problem driven by these metrics. The proposed framework is demonstrated using a real-world WDS with 6,064 pipes. Results obtained show that the proposed framework successfully identifies near-optimal sequencing of recovery actions for this complex WDS. The gained insights, conditional on the specific attributes of the case study, include: (i) the near-optimal sequencing of recovery strategy heavily depends on the damage properties of the WDS, (ii) replacements of damaged elements tend to be scheduled at the intermediate-late stages of the recovery process due to their long operation time, and (iii) interventions to damaged pipe elements near critical facilities (e.g., hospitals) should not be necessarily the first priority to recover due to complex hydraulic interactions within the WDS

Critical Infrastructures: Enhancing Preparedness & Resilience for the Security of Citizens and Services Supply Continuity: Proceedings of the 52nd ESReDA Seminar Hosted by the Lithuanian Energy Institute & Vytautas Magnus University

Critical Infrastructures Preparedness and Resilience is a major societal security issue in modern society. Critical Infrastructures (CIs) provide vital services to modern societies. Some CIs’ disruptions may endanger the security of the citizen, the safety of the strategic assets and even the governance continuity. The European Safety, Reliability and Data Association (ESReDA) as one of the most active EU networks in the field has initiated a project group on the “Critical Infrastructure/Modelling, Simulation and Analysis – Data”. The main focus of the project group is to report on the state of progress in MS&A of the CIs preparedness & resilience with a specific focus on the corresponding data availability and relevance. In order to report on the most recent developments in the field of the CIs preparedness & resilience MS&A and the availability of the relevant data, ESReDA held its 52nd Seminar on the following thematic: “Critical Infrastructures: Enhancing Preparedness & Resilience for the security of citizens and services supply continuity”. The 52nd ESReDA Seminar was a very successful event, which attracted about 50 participants from industry, authorities, operators, research centres, academia and consultancy companies.JRC.G.10-Knowledge for Nuclear Security and Safet

Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

[EN] The paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.Paez, D.; Filion, Y.; Castro-Gama, M.; Quintiliani, C.; Santopietro, S.; Sweetapple, C.; Meng, F.... (2020). Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 146(8):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239S1131468Balut A. R. Brodziak J. Bylka and P. Zakrzewski. 2018. “Battle of post-disaster response and restauration (BPDRR).” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Bibok A. 2018. “Near-optimal restoration scheduling of damaged drinking water distribution systems using machine learning.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Castro-Gama M. C. Quintiliani and S. Santopietro. 2018. “After earthquake post-disaster response using a many-objective approach a greedy and engineering interventions.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Cimellaro, G. P., Tinebra, A., Renschler, C., & Fragiadakis, M. (2016). New Resilience Index for Urban Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(8). doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001433Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1), 21-27. doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964Creaco, E., Franchini, M., & Alvisi, S. (2010). Optimal Placement of Isolation Valves in Water Distribution Systems Based on Valve Cost and Weighted Average Demand Shortfall. Water Resources Management, 24(15), 4317-4338. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9661-5Deb, K., Mohan, M., & Mishra, S. (2005). Evaluating the ε-Domination Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for a Quick Computation of Pareto-Optimal Solutions. Evolutionary Computation, 13(4), 501-525. doi:10.1162/106365605774666895Deuerlein J. D. Gilbert E. Abraham and O. Piller. 2018. “A greedy scheduling of post-disaster response and restoration using pressure-driven models and graph segment analysis.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Deuerlein, J. W. (2008). Decomposition Model of a General Water Supply Network Graph. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(6), 822-832. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:6(822)Di Nardo, A., Di Natale, M., Giudicianni, C., Santonastaso, G. F., & Savic, D. (2018). Simplified Approach to Water Distribution System Management via Identification of a Primary Network. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(2), 04017089. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000885Eliades D. G. M. Kyriakou S. Vrachimis and M. M. Polycarpou. 2016. “EPANET-MATLAB toolkit: An open-source software for interfacing EPANET with MATLAB.” In Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Computing and Control for the Water Industry (CCWI) 8. The Hague The Netherlands: International Water Conferences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.831493.Fragiadakis, M., Christodoulou, S. E., & Vamvatsikos, D. (2013). Reliability Assessment of Urban Water Distribution Networks Under Seismic Loads. Water Resources Management, 27(10), 3739-3764. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0378-0Gilbert, D., Abraham, E., Montalvo, I., & Piller, O. (2017). Iterative Multistage Method for a Large Water Network Sectorization into DMAs under Multiple Design Objectives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143(11), 04017067. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000835Hill, D., Kerkez, B., Rasekh, A., Ostfeld, A., Minsker, B., & Banks, M. K. (2014). Sensing and Cyberinfrastructure for Smarter Water Management: The Promise and Challenge of Ubiquity. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(7), 01814002. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000449Hwang, H. H. M., Lin, H., & Shinozuka, M. (1998). Seismic Performance Assessment of Water Delivery Systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4(3), 118-125. doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(1998)4:3(118)Li Y. J. Gao C. Jian C. Ou and S. Hu. 2018. “A two-stage post-disaster response and restoration method for the water distribution system.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Liu, W., Zhao, Y., & Li, J. (2014). Seismic functional reliability analysis of water distribution networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), 363-375. doi:10.1080/15732479.2014.887121Luong, H. T., & Nagarur, N. N. (2005). Optimal Maintenance Policy and Fund Allocation in Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131(4), 299-306. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2005)131:4(299)MacQueen J. B. 1967. “Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations.” In Vol. 1 of Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 281–297. Berkeley: University of California Press.Mahmoud, H. A., Kapelan, Z., & Savić, D. (2018). Real-Time Operational Response Methodology for Reducing Failure Impacts in Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(7), 04018029. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000956Meng, F., Fu, G., Farmani, R., Sweetapple, C., & Butler, D. (2018). Topological attributes of network resilience: A study in water distribution systems. Water Research, 143, 376-386. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.048Ostfeld, A., Uber, J. G., Salomons, E., Berry, J. W., Hart, W. E., Phillips, C. A., … Walski, T. (2008). The Battle of the Water Sensor Networks (BWSN): A Design Challenge for Engineers and Algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 134(6), 556-568. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2008)134:6(556)Paez D. Y. Filion and M. Hulley. 2018a. “Battle of post-disaster response and restoration (BPDRR)—Problem description and rules.” Accessed June 14 2019. https://www.queensu.ca/wdsa-ccwi2018/problem-description-and-files.Paez, D., Suribabu, C. R., & Filion, Y. (2018). Method for Extended Period Simulation of Water Distribution Networks with Pressure Driven Demands. Water Resources Management, 32(8), 2837-2846. doi:10.1007/s11269-018-1961-1Salcedo C. A. Aguilar P. Cuero S. Gonzalez S. Muñoz J. Pérez A. Posada J. Robles and K. Vargas. 2018. “Determination of the hydraulic restoration capacity of b-city involving a multi-criteria decision support model.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Santonastaso G. F. E. Creaco A. Di Nardo and M. Di Natale. 2018. “Post-disaster response and restauration of B-town network based on primary network.” In Vol. 1 of Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Sophocleous S. E. Nikoloudi H. A. Mahmoud K. Woodward and M. Romano. 2018. “Simulation-based framework for the restoration of earthquake-damaged water distribution networks using a genetic algorithm.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Sweetapple C. F. Meng R. Farmani G. Fu and D. Butler. 2018. “A heuristic approach to water network post-disaster response and restoration.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems.Tabucchi, T., Davidson, R., & Brink, S. (2010). Simulation of post-earthquake water supply system restoration. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 27(4), 263-279. doi:10.1080/10286600902862615Taormina, R., Galelli, S., Tippenhauer, N. O., Salomons, E., Ostfeld, A., Eliades, D. G., … Ohar, Z. (2018). Battle of the Attack Detection Algorithms: Disclosing Cyber Attacks on Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(8), 04018048. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000969Walski, T. M. (1993). Water distribution valve topology for reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 42(1), 21-27. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(93)90051-yWang, Y., Au, S.-K., & Fu, Q. (2010). Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Water Supply Systems. Earthquake Spectra, 26(1), 257-274. doi:10.1193/1.3276900Yoo, D. G., Kang, D., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Optimal design of water supply networks for enhancing seismic reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 146, 79-88. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.001Zhang Q. F. Zheng K. Diao B. Ulanicki and Y. Huang. 2018. “Solving the battle of post-disaster response and restauration (BPDRR) problem with the aid of multi-phase optimization framework.” In Proc. 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. 14. Kingston Canada: Open Journal Systems

Optimizing resilience decision-support for natural gas networks under uncertainty

2019 Summer.Includes bibliographical references.Community resilience in the aftermath of a hazard requires the functionality of complex, interdependent infrastructure systems become operational in a timely manner to support social and economic institutions. In the context of risk management and community resilience, critical decisions should be made not only in the aftermath of a disaster in order to immediately respond to the destructive event and properly repair the damage, but preventive decisions should to be made in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of hazards prior to their occurrence. This involves significant uncertainty about the basic notion of the hazard itself, and usually involves mitigation strategies such as strengthening components or preparing required resources for post-event repairs. In essence, instances of risk management problems that encourage a framework for coupled decisions before and after events include modeling how to allocate resources before the disruptive event so as to maximize the efficiency for their distribution to repair in the aftermath of the event, and how to determine which network components require preventive investments in order to enhance their performance in case of an event. In this dissertation, a methodology is presented for optimal decision making for resilience assessment, seismic risk mitigation, and recovery of natural gas networks, taking into account their interdependency with some of the other systems within the community. In this regard, the natural gas and electric power networks of a virtual community were modeled with enough detail such that it enables assessment of natural gas network supply at the community level. The effect of the industrial makeup of a community on its natural gas recovery following an earthquake, as well as the effect of replacing conventional steel pipes with ductile HDPE pipelines as an effective mitigation strategy against seismic hazard are investigated. In addition, a multi objective optimization framework that integrates probabilistic seismic risk assessment of coupled infrastructure systems and evolutionary algorithms is proposed in order to determine cost-optimal decisions before and after a seismic event, with the objective of making the natural gas network recover more rapidly, and thus the community more resilient. Including bi-directional interdependencies between the natural gas and electric power network, strategic decisions are pursued regarding which distribution pipelines in the gas network should be retrofitted under budget constraints, with the objectives to minimizing the number of people without natural gas in the residential sector and business losses due to the lack of natural gas in non-residential sectors. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is used in order to propagate uncertainties and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) is adopted in order to capture uncertainties in the seismic hazard with an approach to preserve spatial correlation. A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) approach is utilized to solve the multi-objective optimization problem under study. The results prove the potential of the developed methodology to provide risk-informed decision support, while being able to deal with large-scale, interdependent complex infrastructure considering probabilistic seismic hazard scenarios

Water Systems towards New Future Challenges

This book comprises components associated with smart water which aims at the exploitation and building of more sustainable and technological water networks towards the water–energy nexus and system efficiency. The implementation of modeling frameworks for measuring the performance based on a set of relevant indicators and data applications and model interfaces provides better support for decisions towards greater sustainability and more flexible and safer solutions. The hydraulic, management, and structural models represent the most effective and viable way to predict the behavior of the water networks under a wide range of conditions of demand and system failures. The knowledge of reliable parameters is crucial to develop approach models and, therefore, positive decisions in real time to be implemented in smart water systems. On the other hand, the models of operation in real-time optimization allow us to extend decisions to smart water systems in order to improve the efficiency of the water network and ensure more reliable and flexible operations, maximizing cost, environmental, and social savings associated with losses or failures. The data obtained in real time instantly update the network model towards digital water models, showing the characteristic parameters of pumps, valves, pressures, and flows, as well as hours of operation towards the lowest operating costs, in order to meet the requirement objectives for an efficient system