138 research outputs found
An Optimal Decision Procedure for MPNL over the Integers
Interval temporal logics provide a natural framework for qualitative and
quantitative temporal reason- ing over interval structures, where the truth of
formulae is defined over intervals rather than points. In this paper, we study
the complexity of the satisfiability problem for Metric Propositional Neigh-
borhood Logic (MPNL). MPNL features two modalities to access intervals "to the
left" and "to the right" of the current one, respectively, plus an infinite set
of length constraints. MPNL, interpreted over the naturals, has been recently
shown to be decidable by a doubly exponential procedure. We improve such a
result by proving that MPNL is actually EXPSPACE-complete (even when length
constraints are encoded in binary), when interpreted over finite structures,
the naturals, and the in- tegers, by developing an EXPSPACE decision procedure
for MPNL over the integers, which can be easily tailored to finite linear
orders and the naturals (EXPSPACE-hardness was already known).Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2011, arXiv:1106.081
Decidability of the interval temporal logic ABBar over the natural numbers
In this paper, we focus our attention on the interval temporal logic of the
Allen's relations "meets", "begins", and "begun by" (ABBar for short),
interpreted over natural numbers. We first introduce the logic and we show that
it is expressive enough to model distinctive interval properties,such as
accomplishment conditions, to capture basic modalities of point-based temporal
logic, such as the until operator, and to encode relevant metric constraints.
Then, we prove that the satisfiability problem for ABBar over natural numbers
is decidable by providing a small model theorem based on an original
contraction method. Finally, we prove the EXPSPACE-completeness of the proble
Crossing the Undecidability Border with Extensions of Propositional Neighborhood Logic over Natural Numbers
Propositional Neighborhood Logic (PNL) is an interval temporal logic featuring two modalities corresponding to the relations of right and left neighborhood between two intervals on a linear order (in terms of Allen's relations, meets and met by). Recently, it has been shown that PNL interpreted over several classes of linear orders, including natural numbers, is decidable (NEXPTIME-complete) and that some of its natural extensions preserve decidability. Most notably, this is the case with PNL over natural numbers extended with a limited form of metric constraints and with the future fragment of PNL extended with modal operators corresponding to Allen's relations begins, begun by, and before. This paper aims at demonstrating that PNL and its metric version MPNL, interpreted over natural numbers, are indeed very close to the border with undecidability, and even relatively weak extensions of them become undecidable. In particular, we show that (i) the addition of binders on integer variables ranging over interval lengths makes the resulting hybrid extension of MPNL undecidable, and (ii) a very weak first-order extension of the future fragment of PNL, obtained by replacing proposition letters by a restricted subclass of first-order formulae where only one variable is allowed, is undecidable (in contrast with the decidability of similar first-order extensions of point-based temporal logics)
Complete and Terminating Tableau for the Logic of Proper Subinterval Structures over Dense Orderings
We introduce special pseudo-models for the interval logic of proper subintervals over dense linear orderings. We prove finite model property with respect to such pseudo-models, and using that result we develop a decision procedure based on a sound, complete, and terminating tableau for that logic. The case of proper subintervals is essentially more complicated than the case of strict subintervals, for which we developed a similar tableau-based decision procedure in a recent work
Decidability and complexity of the fragments of the modal logic of Allen's relations over the rationals
Interval temporal logics provide a natural framework for temporal
reasoning about interval structures over linearly
ordered domains, where intervals are taken as first-class
citizens. Their expressive power and computational behaviour
mainly depend on two parameters: the set of modalities they feature and
the linear orders over which they are interpreted. In this paper, we consider
all fragments of Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic hs
with a decidable satisfiability problem over the rationals,
and we provide a complete classification of them in
terms of their expressiveness and computational complexity by solving the last few
open problems
The addition of temporal neighborhood makes the logic of prefixes and sub-intervals EXPSPACE-complete
A classic result by Stockmeyer gives a non-elementary lower bound to the
emptiness problem for star-free generalized regular expressions. This result is
intimately connected to the satisfiability problem for interval temporal logic,
notably for formulas that make use of the so-called chop operator. Such an
operator can indeed be interpreted as the inverse of the concatenation
operation on regular languages, and this correspondence enables reductions
between non-emptiness of star-free generalized regular expressions and
satisfiability of formulas of the interval temporal logic of chop under the
homogeneity assumption. In this paper, we study the complexity of the
satisfiability problem for suitable weakenings of the chop interval temporal
logic, that can be equivalently viewed as fragments of Halpern and Shoham
interval logic. We first consider the logic featuring
modalities , for \emph{begins}, corresponding to the prefix relation on
pairs of intervals, and , for \emph{during}, corresponding to the infix
relation. The homogeneous models of naturally correspond to
languages defined by restricted forms of regular expressions, that use union,
complementation, and the inverses of the prefix and infix relations. Such a
fragment has been recently shown to be PSPACE-complete . In this paper, we
study the extension with the temporal neighborhood modality
(corresponding to the Allen relation \emph{Meets}), and prove that it
increases both its expressiveness and complexity. In particular, we show that
the resulting logic is EXPSPACE-complete.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2109.0832
Undecidability of the Logic of Overlap Relation over Discrete Linear Orderings
5The validity/satisfiability problem for most propositional interval temporal logics is (highly) undecidable, under very weak assumptions on the class of interval structures in which they are interpreted. That, in particular, holds for most fragments of Halpern and Shoham’s interval modal logic HS. Still, decidability
is the rule for the fragments of HS with only one modal operator, based on an Allen’s relation. In this paper, we show that the logic O of the Overlap relation, when interpreted over discrete linear orderings, is an exception. The proof is based on a reduction from the undecidable octant tiling problem. This is one of the sharpest undecidability result for fragments of HS.openopenBRESOLIN Davide; DELLA MONICA Dario; GORANKO Valentin; MONTANARI Angelo; SCIAVICCO GuidoBresolin, Davide; DELLA MONICA, Dario; Goranko, Valentin; Montanari, Angelo; Sciavicco, Guid
The Temporal Logic of two dimensional Minkowski spacetime is decidable
We consider Minkowski spacetime, the set of all point-events of spacetime
under the relation of causal accessibility. That is, can access if an electromagnetic or (slower than light) mechanical signal could be
sent from to . We use Prior's tense language of
and representing causal accessibility and its converse relation. We
consider two versions, one where the accessibility relation is reflexive and
one where it is irreflexive.
In either case it has been an open problem, for decades, whether the logic is
decidable or axiomatisable. We make a small step forward by proving, for the
case where the accessibility relation is irreflexive, that the set of valid
formulas over two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime is decidable, decidability
for the reflexive case follows from this. The complexity of either problem is
PSPACE-complete.
A consequence is that the temporal logic of intervals with real endpoints
under either the containment relation or the strict containment relation is
PSPACE-complete, the same is true if the interval accessibility relation is
"each endpoint is not earlier", or its irreflexive restriction.
We provide a temporal formula that distinguishes between three-dimensional
and two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime and another temporal formula that
distinguishes the two-dimensional case where the underlying field is the real
numbers from the case where instead we use the rational numbers.Comment: 30 page
- …