161 research outputs found

    Spatio-temporal constraints for emissivity and surface temperature retrieval: Preliminary results and comparisons for SEVIRI and IASI observation

    Get PDF
    Infrared instrumentation on geostationary satellites is now rapidly approaching the spectral quality and accuracy of modern sensors flying on polar platforms. Currently, the core of EUMETSAT geostationary meteorological programme is the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG). However, EUMETSAT is preparing for the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG). The capability of geostationary satellites to resolve the diurnal cycle and hence to provide time-resolved sequences or times series of observations is a source of information which could suitably constrain the derivation of geophysical parameters. Nowadays, also because of lack of time continuity, when dealing with observations from polar platforms, the problem of deriving geophysical parameters is normally solved by considering each single observation as independent of past and future events. For historical reason, the same approach is currently pursued with geostationary observations, which are still being dealt with as they were with polar observations. In this study we show some preliminary results on emissivity and surface temperature retrieval for SEVIRI observations, using the Kalman filter methodology (KF) and compare the retrievals with those obtained using IASI observations co-localized with SEVIRI ones using the times accumulation approach (Optimal Estimation OE). The Sahara desert was chosen as target area, and both SEVIRI and IASI data (infrared radiances and cloud mask) were acquired. The time period considered is that of July 2010 (the whole month). ECMWF analyses for the same date and target area have also been acquired, which comprise Ts, T(p), O(p), Q(p) for the canonical hours 0:00, 6:00, 12:00 and 18:00. Moreover, for the purpose of developing a suitable background for emissivity, the Global Infrared Land Surface Emissivity database developed at CIMSS, University of Wisconsin, derived by MODIS observations was used and was available from the year 2003 till 2011. Concerning the performance of the two methodologies, the retrieval of skin temperature is almost equivalent. The agreement between OE and KF is fairly good if compared with ECMWF analysis for sea surface, while for land surface, OE and KF agree fairly well with ECMWF during the night, but at midday ECMWF shows a cold bias of 10 K and more. For emissivity the comparison with the UW/BFEMIS database for the same date and location is fairly good for both methods

    Surface Emissivity Retrieved with Satellite Ultraspectral IR Measurements for Monitoring Global Change

    Get PDF
    Surface and atmospheric thermodynamic parameters retrieved with advanced ultraspectral remote sensors aboard Earth observing satellites are critical to general atmospheric and Earth science research, climate monitoring, and weather prediction. Ultraspectral resolution infrared radiance obtained from nadir observations provide atmospheric, surface, and cloud information. Presented here is the global surface IR emissivity retrieved from Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) measurements under "clear-sky" conditions. Fast radiative transfer models, applied to the cloud-free (or clouded) atmosphere, are used for atmospheric profile and surface parameter (or cloud parameter) retrieval. The inversion scheme, dealing with cloudy as well as cloud-free radiances observed with ultraspectral infrared sounders, has been developed to simultaneously retrieve atmospheric thermodynamic and surface (or cloud microphysical) parameters. Rapidly produced surface emissivity is initially evaluated through quality control checks on the retrievals of other impacted atmospheric and surface parameters. Surface emissivity and surface skin temperature from the current and future operational satellites can and will reveal critical information on the Earth s ecosystem and land surface type properties, which can be utilized as part of long-term monitoring for the Earth s environment and global climate change

    IASI ์ผ์ฐจ๋ณ€๋ถ„๋ฒ• ์ž๋ฃŒ๋™ํ™” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋‚ด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์‚ฐ์ถœ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์˜ˆ๋ณด ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ง€๊ตฌํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ์†๋ณ‘์ฃผ.The Unified Model (UM) data assimilation system incorporates a one-dimensional variational (1D-Var) analysis of cloud variables for hyperspectral infrared sounders that allows the assimilation of radiances in cloudy areas. For the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) radiance assimilation in the UM, a first guess pair of cloud top pressure (CTP) and cloud fraction (CF) is estimated using the minimum residual (MR) method, which simultaneously obtains CTP and CF by minimizing radiances difference between observation and model simulation. In this study, specific pairs of CTP and CF yielding the smallest 1D-Var temperature and humidity analysis error were found from the ECMWF short-range forecast based IASI simulated radiances and background states, and defined as optimum cloud parameters. Compared to the optimum results, it is noted that the MR method tends to overestimate cloud top height while underestimating cloud fraction. This fact necessitates an improved cloud retrieval for better 1D-Var analysis performance. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach was taken to estimate CTP as close as possible to the optimum value, based on the hypothesis that CTP and CF closer to the optimum values will bring in better 1D-Var results. The ANN-based cloud retrievals indicated that CTP and CF biases and root mean square errors against the optimum values shown in the MR method are much reduced. The resultant 1D-Var analysis with new first guess based on the ANN method showed that the errors of temperature and moisture in the mid-troposphere are reduced, due to the use of larger volume of cloud-affected infrared radiances. Furthermore, the computational time can be substantially reduced as much as 1.85% by the ANN method, compared to the MR method. The evaluation of the ANN method in the UM global weather forecasting system demonstrated that it helps to use more infrared radiances in the cloudy-sky data assimilation. Although its impact on the UM global temperature and moisture forecasts was found to be near neutral, it has been demonstrated that the UM global precipitation forecasts and tropical cyclone forecast, which occur mostly around cloud regions, can be improved by the ANN method.๊ธฐ์ƒ์ฒญ ํ˜„์—… ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ๋ธ (Unified Model) ๋‚ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋™ํ™” ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘, ์ ์™ธ ์ดˆ๋ถ„๊ด‘ ์„ผ์„œ์ธ IASI (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer) ๊ด€์ธก์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ 1D-Var ๊ณผ์ • ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๋Š” Cloudy 1D-Var ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(Pavelin et al., 2008)์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. Cloudy 1D-Var ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„๋ณ€์ˆ˜(์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„, ์šด๋Ÿ‰)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์ง€์—ญ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋™ํ™”์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„์™€ ์šด๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. Cloudy 1D-Var ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์—์„œ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์ธ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„์™€ ์šด๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ๊ฐ’์€ minimum residual (MR) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(Eyre and Menzel, 1989)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ด€์ธก ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์žฅ์ด ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ECMWF ๋‹จ๊ธฐ์˜ˆ๋ณด์žฅ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ IASI ๋ชจ์˜ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์žฅ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ตœ์ข… ์˜จ๋„ ์Šต๋„ ๋ถ„์„์žฅ์˜ ์—๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด์–ด ์ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„, ์šด๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์˜ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ MR ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ณ ๋„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ธต์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์˜จ์Šต๋„ 1D-Var ๋ถ„์„์žฅ์˜ ์—๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜จ์Šต๋„ 1D-Var ๋ถ„์„์žฅ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , IASI ์ ์™ธ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์žฅ์„ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•ด๋‚ด๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง(ANN; Artificial Neural Network) ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ANN ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„, ์šด๋Ÿ‰์ด ์•ž์„œ ์ •์˜ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„, ์šด๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ฑ„๋„๋“ค์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋™ํ™” ๊ณผ์ • ๋‚ด์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ธฐ์กด MR ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ 1D-Var ์˜จ์Šต๋„ ๋ถ„์„์žฅ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ธต์—์„œ ์˜จ์Šต๋„ ๋ถ„์„์žฅ์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ , ํŠนํžˆ ์ค‘์ธต์—์„œ ์˜จ๋„ ์—๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ 10% ๊ฐ€๋Ÿ‰ ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ANN ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์šด๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ธฐ์กด MR ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ 1.85%๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ์žฅ์ ๊นŒ์ง€ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ANN ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์‹ค์ œ UM ๋‚ด์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ์‹œ์ผœ ๋ณด์•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋•Œ๋„ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ MR ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ์šด์ •๊ณ ๋„๋ณด๋‹ค ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์ง€์—ญ IASI ์ ์™ธ ์ดˆ๋ถ„๊ด‘ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋™ํ™” ๊ณผ์ • ๋‚ด์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ANN ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜์˜ˆ๋ณด ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์žฅ ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ๋ณด์žฅ ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ์ฃผ๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ๋„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ „ ์ง€๊ตฌ์  ์˜จ์Šต๋„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์žฅ ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ๋ณด ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฃผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ์ง€์—ญ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์—์„œ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋‚ ์”จ ํ˜„์ƒ์ธ ๊ฐ•์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ด๋Œ€ ์ €๊ธฐ์••์˜ ์˜ˆ๋ณด์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ANN ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 2. Background and theory 6 2.1. IASI hyperspectral measurement 6 2.2. Theoretical background 10 2.3. Radiance simulation in Radiative Transfer Model 12 3. IASI 1D-Var assimilation 14 3.1. Retrieval of cloud top pressure and cloud fraction 14 3.2. 1D-Var analysis 20 4. Preparation of simulation dataset 21 4.1. ECMWF short-range forecast 21 4.2. Simulation of IASI radiances 25 4.3. Simulation of UM background profiles 32 5. Assessment of pre-developed methods with simulation dataset 35 5.1. Pre-developed cloudy-sky radiance assimilation 35 5.2. Assessment of the pre-developed assimilation method 37 6. Development of a new cloud parameters retrieval method 40 6.1. Definition of 'Optimum CTP' 40 6.2. Evaluation of original retrieval method 48 6.3. New retrieval method with an ANN approach 54 7. Assessment of ANN retrieval method in the 1D-Var analysis 58 7.1. Simulation Framework 58 7.2. Experiments with the UM NWP system 73 8. Impact study of ANN method on the UM forecast 83 8.1. Assessment of experiments in the UM NWP system 85 8.2. Impact on the precipitation forecast 92 8.3. Impact of tropical cyclone forecast 97 9. Summary and discussion 110 References 116 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 121 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ธ€ 124Docto

    GEWEX water vapor assessment (G-VAP): final report

    Get PDF
    Este es un informe dentro del Programa para la Investigaciรณn del Clima Mundial (World Climate Research Programme, WCRP) cuya misiรณn es facilitar el anรกlisis y la predicciรณn de la variabilidad de la Tierra para proporcionar un valor aรฑadido a la sociedad a nivel prรกctica. La WCRP tiene varios proyectos centrales, de los cuales el de Intercambio Global de Energรญa y Agua (Global Energy and Water Exchanges, GEWEX) es uno de ellos. Este proyecto se centra en estudiar el ciclo hidrolรณgico global y regional, asรญ como sus interacciones a travรฉs de la radiaciรณn y energรญa y sus implicaciones en el cambio global. Dentro de GEWEX existe el proyecto de Evaluaciรณn del Vapor de Agua (VAP, Water Vapour Assessment) que estudia las medidas de concentraciones de vapor de agua en la atmรณsfera, sus interacciones radiativas y su repercusiรณn en el cambio climรกtico global.El vapor de agua es, de largo, el gas invernadero mรกs importante que reside en la atmรณsfera. Es, potencialmente, la causa principal de la amplificaciรณn del efecto invernadero causado por emisiones de origen humano (principalmente el CO2). Las medidas precisas de su concentraciรณn en la atmรณsfera son determinantes para cuantificar este efecto de retroalimentaciรณn positivo al cambio climรกtico. Actualmente, se estรก lejos de tener medidas de concentraciones de vapor de agua suficientemente precisas para sacar conclusiones significativas de dicho efecto. El informe del WCRP titulado "GEWEX water vapor assessment. Final Report" detalla el estado actual de las medidas de las concentraciones de vapor de agua en la atmรณsfera. AEMET ha colaborado en la generaciรณn de este informe y tiene a unos de sus miembros, Xavier Calbet, como co-autor de este informe

    Innovative Techniques for the Retrieval of Earthโ€™s Surface and Atmosphere Geophysical Parameters: Spaceborne Infrared/Microwave Combined Analyses

    Get PDF
    With the advent of the first satellites for Earth Observation: Landsat-1 in July 1972 and ERS-1 in May 1991, the discipline of environmental remote sensing has become, over time, increasingly fundamental for the study of phenomena characterizing the planet Earth. The goal of environmental remote sensing is to perform detailed analyses and to monitor the temporal evolution of different physical phenomena, exploiting the mechanisms of interaction between the objects that are present in an observed scene and the electromagnetic radiation detected by sensors, placed at a distance from the scene, operating at different frequencies. The analyzed physical phenomena are those related to climate change, weather forecasts, global ocean circulation, greenhouse gas profiling, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, soil subsidence, and the effects of rapid urbanization processes. Generally, remote sensing sensors are of two primary types: active and passive. Active sensors use their own source of electromagnetic radiation to illuminate and analyze an area of interest. An active sensor emits radiation in the direction of the area to be investigated and then detects and measures the radiation that is backscattered from the objects contained in that area. Passive sensors, on the other hand, detect natural electromagnetic radiation (e.g., from the Sun in the visible band and the Earth in the infrared and microwave bands) emitted or reflected by the object contained in the observed scene. The scientific community has dedicated many resources to developing techniques to estimate, study and analyze Earthโ€™s geophysical parameters. These techniques differ for active and passive sensors because they depend strictly on the type of the measured physical quantity. In my P.h.D. work, inversion techniques for estimating Earthโ€™s surface and atmosphere geophysical parameters will be addressed, emphasizing methods based on machine learning (ML). In particular, the study of cloud microphysics and the characterization of Earthโ€™s surface changes phenomenon are the critical points of this work

    Quantifying the Uncertainty of Land Surface Temperature Retrievals From SEVIRI/Meteosat

    Full text link

    Development of Regionally Focused Algorithm for AIRS Temperature and Humidity Retrievals Using a Moving-Window Technique

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ง€๊ตฌํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€, 2017. 8. ์†๋ณ‘์ฃผ.Regionally focused algorithm for Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) temperature and humidity retrievals was developed. We first employed regression model with a moving window technique. This is done by relating the AIRS measurements to temperature and humidity profiles with consideration of regionally and seasonally changing local climatology. Regression coefficients were obtained from four-year (2006-2009) of ECMWF interim data over East Asia and simulated AIRS radiances. Result showing a notable improvement of mean biases, compared to the regression retrieval which does not consider local features, suggests that the moving-window technique can produce better regression retrievals by including the local climatology in the regression model. For further improvement of the regression retrieval, one dimensional variational (1DVAR) physical model was also included in our algorithm. Error covariance matrix for the moving-window regression was obtained by using pre-developed regression retrieval and its error covariance. To assess the performance of 1DVAR using the mowing-window regression as a priori, error statistics of the physical retrievals from clear-sky AIRS measurements during four months of observation (March, June, September, and December of 2010) were comparedthe results obtained using new a priori information were compared with those using a priori information from a global set of training data which are classified into six classes of infrared (IR) window channel brightness temperature. This comparison demonstrated that the physical retrieval from the moving-window regression shows better result in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) improvement. For temperature, RMSE improvements of 0.1 โ€“ 0.2 K and 0.25 โ€“ 0.5 K were achieved over the 150 โ€“ 300 hPa and 900 โ€“ 1000 hPa layers, respectively. For water vapor given as relative humidity, the RMSE was reduced by 1.5 โ€“ 3.5% above the 300 hPa level and by 0.5 โ€“ 1% within the 700 โ€“ 950 hPa layer. As most of improvements due to use of the moving-window technique were shown in situations in which the relationship between measured radiances and atmospheric state is not clear, we investigated a possible use of surface data for further improving AIRS temperature and humidity retrievals over the boundary layer. Surface data were statistically and physically used for our AIRS retrieval algorithm. Results showing reduced RMSEs at both the surface level and the boundary layer, suggest that the use of surface data can help better resolve vertical structure of temperature and moisture near the surface layer by alleviating the influences of incomplete channel weighting function near the surface on the retrieval. In conclusion, developing regionally focused algorithm, the inclusion of climate features in the AIRS retrieval algorithm can result in better temperature and humidity retrievals. Further improvement was also demonstrated by adding surface station data to the channel radiances as pseudo channels. Since the hyperspectral sounder is available on the geostationary platform, the development of regionally focused algorithm could enhance its applicability to enhance our ability to monitor and forecast severe weather.1. Introduction 1 2. Review of previous satellite-based temperature and humidity soundings 7 3. Infrared hyperspectral measurements 18 4. Development of regionally focused regression model 24 4.1. Construction of training data 24 4.2. Moving-window regression model 32 4.3. Detecting clear-sky FOVS from MODIS measurements 35 4.4. Error analysis 37 4.4.1. Validation by using independent simulation dataset 37 4.4.2. Case study 50 4.4.3. Comparison retrievals from real observation with reanalysis data 55 5. Impact of a priori information improvement on accuracy of 1DVAR 62 5.1. 1DVAR model 62 5.1.1. Background error covariance 63 5.1.2. Averaging kernel 68 5.1.3. Residual analysis for convergence criteria and quality control 68 5.2. Error analysis 74 5.2.1. Validation by using independent simulation dataset 74 5.2.2. Case study 83 5.2.3. Comparison retrievals from real observation with reanalysis data 87 6. Synergetic use of AWS data for AIRS T/q retrievals 94 6.1. Impact of AWS data on AIRS T/q soundings: Statistical perspective 98 6.1.1. Pseudo-AWS data for training 98 6.1.2. Retrieval sensitivity related to error of AWS data 101 6.1.3. Change of regression coefficient due to use of AWS data 108 6.1.4. Application 113 6.2. Impact of AWS data on AIRS T/q soundings: Physical perspective 115 6.2.1. 1DVAR with AWS observation 115 6.2.2. Result 117 7. Summary and discussion 120 References 125 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 135Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore