Specifying Software Languages: Grammars, Projectional Editors, and Unconventional Approaches

We discuss several approaches for defining software languages, together with Integrated Development Environments for them. Theoretical foundation is grammar-based models: they can be used where proven correctness of specifications is required. From a practical point of view, we discuss how language specification can be made more accessible by focusing on language workbenches and projectional editing, and discuss how it can be formalized. We also give a brief overview of unconventional ideas to language definition, and outline three open problems connected to the approaches we discuss

Subtree replacement systems

Theory and computer applications of subtree replacement system

Translations on a context free grammar

Two schemes for the specification of translations on a context-free grammar are proposed. The first scheme, called a generalized syntax directed translation (GSDT), consists of a context free grammar with a set of semantic rules associated with each production of the grammar. In a GSDT an input word is parsed according to the underlying context free grammar, and at each node of the tree, a finite number of translation strings are computed in terms of the translation strings defined at the descendants of that node. The functional relationship between the length of input and length of output for translations defined by GSDT's is investigated.The second method for the specification of translations is in terms of tree automata—finite automata with output, walking on derivation trees of a context free grammar. It is shown that tree automata provide an exact characterization for those GSDT's with a linear relationship between input and output length

Fault detection and rectification algorithms in a question-answering system

A Malay proverb "jika sesat di hujung jalan, baleklah kepangkal jalan" roughly means "if you get lost at the end of the road, go back to the beginning". In going back to the beginning of the road, we learn our mistakes and hopefully will not repeat the same mistake again. Thus, this work investigates the use of formal logic as a practical tool for reasoning why we could not infer or deduce a correct answer from a question posed to a database. An extension of the Prolog interpreter is written to mechanise a theorem-proving system based on Horn clauses. This extension procedure will form the basis of the question-answering system. Both input into and output from this system is in the form of predicate calculus. This system can answer all four classes of questions as classified by Chang and Lee (1973). [Continues.

Aspects of the theory of syntax Special technical report no. 11

Formulation of transformational grammar - syntax theor