4,161 research outputs found
A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory
This paper surveys quantum learning theory: the theoretical aspects of
machine learning using quantum computers. We describe the main results known
for three models of learning: exact learning from membership queries, and
Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) and agnostic learning from classical or
quantum examples.Comment: 26 pages LaTeX. v2: many small changes to improve the presentation.
This version will appear as Complexity Theory Column in SIGACT News in June
2017. v3: fixed a small ambiguity in the definition of gamma(C) and updated a
referenc
Implementable Quantum Classifier for Nonlinear Data
In this Letter, we propose a quantum machine learning scheme for the
classification of classical nonlinear data. The main ingredients of our method
are variational quantum perceptron (VQP) and a quantum generalization of
classical ensemble learning. Our VQP employs parameterized quantum circuits to
learn a Grover search (or amplitude amplification) operation with classical
optimization, and can achieve quadratic speedup in query complexity compared to
its classical counterparts. We show how the trained VQP can be used to predict
future data with {query} complexity. Ultimately, a stronger nonlinear
classifier can be established, the so-called quantum ensemble learning (QEL),
by combining a set of weak VQPs produced using a subsampling method. The
subsampling method has two significant advantages. First, all weak VQPs
employed in QEL can be trained in parallel, therefore, the query complexity of
QEL is equal to that of each weak VQP multiplied by . Second, it
dramatically reduce the {runtime} complexity of encoding circuits that map
classical data to a quantum state because this dataset can be significantly
smaller than the original dataset given to QEL. This arguably provides a most
satisfactory solution to one of the most criticized issues in quantum machine
learning proposals. To conclude, we perform two numerical experiments for our
VQP and QEL, implemented by Python and pyQuil library. Our experiments show
that excellent performance can be achieved using a very small quantum circuit
size that is implementable under current quantum hardware development.
Specifically, given a nonlinear synthetic dataset with features for each
example, the trained QEL can classify the test examples that are sampled away
from the decision boundaries using single and two qubits quantum gates
with accuracy.Comment: 9 page
Two new results about quantum exact learning
We present two new results about exact learning by quantum computers. First,
we show how to exactly learn a -Fourier-sparse -bit Boolean function from
uniform quantum examples for that function. This
improves over the bound of uniformly random classical
examples (Haviv and Regev, CCC'15). Our main tool is an improvement of Chang's
lemma for the special case of sparse functions. Second, we show that if a
concept class can be exactly learned using quantum membership
queries, then it can also be learned using classical membership queries. This improves the
previous-best simulation result (Servedio and Gortler, SICOMP'04) by a -factor.Comment: v3: 21 pages. Small corrections and clarification
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
Recently, increased computational power and data availability, as well as
algorithmic advances, have led machine learning techniques to impressive
results in regression, classification, data-generation and reinforcement
learning tasks. Despite these successes, the proximity to the physical limits
of chip fabrication alongside the increasing size of datasets are motivating a
growing number of researchers to explore the possibility of harnessing the
power of quantum computation to speed-up classical machine learning algorithms.
Here we review the literature in quantum machine learning and discuss
perspectives for a mixed readership of classical machine learning and quantum
computation experts. Particular emphasis will be placed on clarifying the
limitations of quantum algorithms, how they compare with their best classical
counterparts and why quantum resources are expected to provide advantages for
learning problems. Learning in the presence of noise and certain
computationally hard problems in machine learning are identified as promising
directions for the field. Practical questions, like how to upload classical
data into quantum form, will also be addressed.Comment: v3 33 pages; typos corrected and references adde
Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithms
In learning theory, the VC dimension of a
concept class is the most common way to measure its "richness." In the PAC
model \Theta\Big(\frac{d}{\eps} + \frac{\log(1/\delta)}{\eps}\Big)
examples are necessary and sufficient for a learner to output, with probability
, a hypothesis that is \eps-close to the target concept . In
the related agnostic model, where the samples need not come from a , we
know that \Theta\Big(\frac{d}{\eps^2} + \frac{\log(1/\delta)}{\eps^2}\Big)
examples are necessary and sufficient to output an hypothesis whose
error is at most \eps worse than the best concept in .
Here we analyze quantum sample complexity, where each example is a coherent
quantum state. This model was introduced by Bshouty and Jackson, who showed
that quantum examples are more powerful than classical examples in some
fixed-distribution settings. However, Atici and Servedio, improved by Zhang,
showed that in the PAC setting, quantum examples cannot be much more powerful:
the required number of quantum examples is
\Omega\Big(\frac{d^{1-\eta}}{\eps} + d + \frac{\log(1/\delta)}{\eps}\Big)\mbox{
for all }\eta> 0. Our main result is that quantum and classical sample
complexity are in fact equal up to constant factors in both the PAC and
agnostic models. We give two approaches. The first is a fairly simple
information-theoretic argument that yields the above two classical bounds and
yields the same bounds for quantum sample complexity up to a \log(d/\eps)
factor. We then give a second approach that avoids the log-factor loss, based
on analyzing the behavior of the "Pretty Good Measurement" on the quantum state
identification problems that correspond to learning. This shows classical and
quantum sample complexity are equal up to constant factors.Comment: 31 pages LaTeX. Arxiv abstract shortened to fit in their
1920-character limit. Version 3: many small changes, no change in result
Learning DNFs under product distributions via {\mu}-biased quantum Fourier sampling
We show that DNF formulae can be quantum PAC-learned in polynomial time under
product distributions using a quantum example oracle. The best classical
algorithm (without access to membership queries) runs in superpolynomial time.
Our result extends the work by Bshouty and Jackson (1998) that proved that DNF
formulae are efficiently learnable under the uniform distribution using a
quantum example oracle. Our proof is based on a new quantum algorithm that
efficiently samples the coefficients of a {\mu}-biased Fourier transform.Comment: 17 pages; v3 based on journal version; minor corrections and
clarification
Learning with Errors is easy with quantum samples
Learning with Errors is one of the fundamental problems in computational
learning theory and has in the last years become the cornerstone of
post-quantum cryptography. In this work, we study the quantum sample complexity
of Learning with Errors and show that there exists an efficient quantum
learning algorithm (with polynomial sample and time complexity) for the
Learning with Errors problem where the error distribution is the one used in
cryptography. While our quantum learning algorithm does not break the LWE-based
encryption schemes proposed in the cryptography literature, it does have some
interesting implications for cryptography: first, when building an LWE-based
scheme, one needs to be careful about the access to the public-key generation
algorithm that is given to the adversary; second, our algorithm shows a
possible way for attacking LWE-based encryption by using classical samples to
approximate the quantum sample state, since then using our quantum learning
algorithm would solve LWE
- âŠ