Logic Programming as Constructivism

The features of logic programming that seem unconventional from the viewpoint of classical logic can be explained in terms of constructivistic logic. We motivate and propose a constructivistic proof theory of non-Horn logic programming. Then, we apply this formalization for establishing results of practical interest. First, we show that 'stratification can be motivated in a simple and intuitive way. Relying on similar motivations, we introduce the larger classes of 'loosely stratified' and 'constructively consistent' programs. Second, we give a formal basis for introducing quantifiers into queries and logic programs by defining 'constructively domain independent* formulas. Third, we extend the Generalized Magic Sets procedure to loosely stratified and constructively consistent programs, by relying on a 'conditional fixpoini procedure

Query Evaluation in Deductive Databases

It is desirable to answer queries posed to deductive databases by computing fixpoints because such computations are directly amenable to set-oriented fact processing. However, the classical fixpoint procedures based on bottom-up processing — the naive and semi-naive methods — are rather primitive and often inefficient. In this article, we rely on bottom-up meta-interpretation for formalizing a new fixpoint procedure that performs a different kind of reasoning: We specify a top-down query answering method, which we call the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Then, we reconsider query evaluation methods for recursive databases. First, we show that the methods based on rewriting on the one hand, and the methods based on resolution on the other hand, implement the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Second, we interpret the rewritings of the Alexander and Magic Set methods as specializations of the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Finally, we argue that such a rewriting is also needed in a database context for implementing efficiently the resolution-based methods. Thus, the methods based on rewriting and the methods based on resolution implement the same top-down evaluation of the original database rules by means of auxiliary rules processed bottom-up

Magic sets with full sharing

In this paper we study the relationship between tabulation and goal-oriented bottom-up evaluation of logic programs. Differences emerge when one tries to identify features of one evaluation method in the other. We show that to obtain the same effect as tabulation in top-down evaluation, one has to perform a careful {\em adornment} in programs to be evaluated bottom-up. Furthermore we propose an efficient algorithm to perform forward subsumption che cking over adorned {\em magic facts}

Taking I/O seriously: resolution reconsidered for disk

Journal ArticleModern compilation techniques can give Prolog programs, in the best cases, a speed comparable to C. However, Prolog has proven to be unacceptable for data-oriented queries for two major reasons: its poor termination and complexity properties for Datalog, and its tuple-at-a-time strategy. A number of tabling frameworks and systems have addressed the first problem, including the XSB system which has achieved Prolog speeds for tabled programs. Yet tabling systems such as XSB continue to use the tuple-at-a-time paradigm. As a result, these systems are not amenable to a tight interconnection with disk-resident data. However, in a tabling framework the difference between tuple-at-a-time behavior and set-at-a-time can be viewed as one of scheduling. Accordingly, we define a breadth-first set-at-a-time tabling strategy and prove it iteration equivalent to a form of semi-naive magic evaluation. That is, we extend the well-known asymptotic results of Seki [10] by proving that each iteration of the tabling strategy produces the same information as semi-naive magic. Further, this set-at-a-time scheduling is amenable to implementation in an engine that uses Prolog compilation. We describe both the engine and its performance, which is comparable with the tuple-at-a-time strategy even for in-memory Datalog queries. Because of its performance and its fine level of integration of Prolog with a database-style search, the set-at-a-time engine appears as an important key to linking logic programming and deductive databases

Depth-bounded bottom-up evaluation of logic programs

AbstractWe present here a depth-bounded bottom-up evaluation algorithm for logic programs. We show that it is sound, complete, and terminating for finite-answer queries if the programs are syntactically restricted to DatalognS, a class of logic programs with limited function symbols. DatalognS is an extension of Datalog capable of representing infinite phenomena. Predicates in DatalognS can have arbitrary unary and limited n-ary function symbols in one distinguished argument. We precisely characterize the computational complexity of depth-bounded evaluation for DatalognS and compare depth-bounded evaluation with other evaluation methods, top-down and Magic Sets among others. We also show that universal safety (finiteness of query answers for any database) is decidable for DatalognS