19 research outputs found
The signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs without trees
Let be the signless Laplacian matrix of a simple graph of
order , where and are the degree diagonal matrix and the
adjacency matrix of , respectively. In this paper, we present a sharp upper
bound for the signless spectral radius of without any tree and characterize
all extremal graphs which attain the upper bound, which may be regarded as a
spectral extremal version for the famous Erd\H{o}s-S\'{o}s conjecture.Comment: 12 page
Connectivity and spanning trees of graphs
This dissertation focuses on connectivity, edge connectivity and edge-disjoint spanning trees in graphs and hypergraphs from the following aspects.;1. Eigenvalue aspect. Let lambda2(G) and tau( G) denote the second largest eigenvalue and the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees of a graph G, respectively. Motivated by a question of Seymour on the relationship between eigenvalues of a graph G and bounds of tau(G), Cioaba and Wong conjectured that for any integers d, k ≥ 2 and a d-regular graph G, if lambda 2(G)) \u3c d -- 2k-1d+1 , then tau(G) ≥ k. They proved the conjecture for k = 2, 3, and presented evidence for the cases when k ≥ 4. We propose a more general conjecture that for a graph G with minimum degree delta ≥ 2 k ≥ 4, if lambda2(G) \u3c delta -- 2k-1d+1 then tau(G) ≥ k. We prove the conjecture for k = 2, 3 and provide partial results for k ≥ 4. We also prove that for a graph G with minimum degree delta ≥ k ≥ 2, if lambda2( G) \u3c delta -- 2k-1d +1 , then the edge connectivity is at least k. As corollaries, we investigate the Laplacian and signless Laplacian eigenvalue conditions on tau(G) and edge connectivity.;2. Network reliability aspect. With graphs considered as natural models for many network design problems, edge connectivity kappa\u27(G) and maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees tau(G) of a graph G have been used as measures for reliability and strength in communication networks modeled as graph G. Let kappa\u27(G) = max{lcub}kappa\u27(H) : H is a subgraph of G{rcub}. We present: (i) For each integer k \u3e 0, a characterization for graphs G with the property that kappa\u27(G) ≤ k but for any additional edge e not in G, kappa\u27(G + e) ≥ k + 1. (ii) For any integer n \u3e 0, a characterization for graphs G with |V(G)| = n such that kappa\u27(G) = tau( G) with |E(G)| minimized.;3. Generalized connectivity. For an integer l ≥ 2, the l-connectivity kappal( G) of a graph G is defined to be the minimum number of vertices of G whose removal produces a disconnected graph with at least l components or a graph with fewer than l vertices. Let k ≥ 1, a graph G is called (k, l)-connected if kappa l(G) ≥ k. A graph G is called minimally (k, l)-connected if kappal(G) ≥ k but ∀e ∈ E( G), kappal(G -- e) ≤ k -- 1. A structural characterization for minimally (2, l)-connected graphs and some extremal results are obtained. These extend former results by Dirac and Plummer on minimally 2-connected graphs.;4. Degree sequence aspect. An integral sequence d = (d1, d2, ···, dn) is hypergraphic if there is a simple hypergraph H with degree sequence d, and such a hypergraph H is a realization of d. A sequence d is r-uniform hypergraphic if there is a simple r- uniform hypergraph with degree sequence d. It is proved that an r-uniform hypergraphic sequence d = (d1, d2, ···, dn) has a k-edge-connected realization if and only if both di ≥ k for i = 1, 2, ···, n and i=1ndi≥ rn-1r-1 , which generalizes the formal result of Edmonds for graphs and that of Boonyasombat for hypergraphs.;5. Partition connectivity augmentation and preservation. Let k be a positive integer. A hypergraph H is k-partition-connected if for every partition P of V(H), there are at least k(| P| -- 1) hyperedges intersecting at least two classes of P. We determine the minimum number of hyperedges in a hypergraph whose addition makes the resulting hypergraph k-partition-connected. We also characterize the hyperedges of a k-partition-connected hypergraph whose removal will preserve k-partition-connectedness
Random incidence matrices: moments of the spectral density
We study numerically and analytically the spectrum of incidence matrices of
random labeled graphs on N vertices : any pair of vertices is connected by an
edge with probability p. We give two algorithms to compute the moments of the
eigenvalue distribution as explicit polynomials in N and p. For large N and
fixed p the spectrum contains a large eigenvalue at Np and a semi-circle of
"small" eigenvalues. For large N and fixed average connectivity pN (dilute or
sparse random matrices limit), we show that the spectrum always contains a
discrete component. An anomaly in the spectrum near eigenvalue 0 for
connectivity close to e=2.72... is observed. We develop recursion relations to
compute the moments as explicit polynomials in pN. Their growth is slow enough
so that they determine the spectrum. The extension of our methods to the
Laplacian matrix is given in Appendix.
Keywords: random graphs, random matrices, sparse matrices, incidence matrices
spectrum, momentsComment: 39 pages, 9 figures, Latex2e, [v2: ref. added, Sect. 4 modified
On the multiplicity of α as an A_α (Γ)-eigenvalue of signed graphs with pendant vertices
A signed graph is a pair Γ = (G; ), where x = (V (G);E(G)) is a graph and
E(G) -> {+1;−1} is the sign function on the edges of G. For any > [0; 1] we consider the
matrix
Aα(Γ) = αD(G) + (1 −α )A(Γ);
where D(G) is the diagonal matrix of the vertex degrees of G, and A(Γ) is the adjacency
matrix of Γ. Let mAα(Γ) be the multiplicity of α as an A(Γ)-eigenvalue, and let G have
p(G) pendant vertices, q(G) quasi-pendant vertices, and no components isomorphic to K2. It
is proved that
mA(Γ)() = p(G) − q(G)
whenever all internal vertices are quasi-pendant. If this is not the case, it turns out that
mA(Γ)() = p(G) − q(G) +mN(Γ)();
where mN(Γ)() denotes the multiplicity of as an eigenvalue of the matrix N(Γ) obtained
from A(Γ) taking the entries corresponding to the internal vertices which are not quasipendant.
Such results allow to state a formula for the multiplicity of 1 as an eigenvalue of
the Laplacian matrix L(Γ) = D(G) − A(Γ). Furthermore, it is detected a class G of signed
graphs whose nullity – i.e. the multiplicity of 0 as an A(Γ)-eigenvalue – does not depend on the
chosen signature. The class G contains, among others, all signed trees and all signed lollipop
graphs. It also turns out that for signed graphs belonging to a subclass G ` G the multiplicity
of 1 as Laplacian eigenvalue does not depend on the chosen signatures. Such subclass contains
trees and circular caterpillars
Laplacian energy of graphs and digraphs.
Spectral graph theory (Algebraic graph theory) which emerged in 1950s and 1960s is the study of properties of a graph in relationship to the characteristic polynomial, eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices associated to the graph. The major source of research in spectral graph theory has been the study of relationship between the structural and spectral properties of graphs. Another source has research in quantum chemistry. Just as astronomers study stellar spectra to determine the make-up of distant stars, one of the main goals in spectral graph theory is to deduce the principal properties and structure of a graph from its graph spectrum (or from a short list of easily computable invariants). The spectral approach for general graphs is a step in this direction.Digital copy of Thesis.University of Kashmir
Machine Learning Techniques as Applied to Discrete and Combinatorial Structures
Machine Learning Techniques have been used on a wide array of input types: images, sound waves, text, and so forth. In articulating these input types to the almighty machine, there have been all sorts of amazing problems that have been solved for many practical purposes.
Nevertheless, there are some input types which don’t lend themselves nicely to the standard set of machine learning tools we have. Moreover, there are some provably difficult problems which are abysmally hard to solve within a reasonable time frame.
This thesis addresses several of these difficult problems. It frames these problems such that we can then attempt to marry the allegedly powerful utility of existing machine learning techniques to the practical solvability of said problems