k-Tuple_Total_Domination_in_Inflated_Graphs

The inflated graph $G_{I}$ of a graph $G$ with $n(G)$ vertices is obtained from $G$ by replacing every vertex of degree $d$ of $G$ by a clique, which is isomorph to the complete graph $K_{d}$, and each edge $(x_{i},x_{j})$ of $G$ is replaced by an edge $(u,v)$ in such a way that $u\in X_{i}$, $v\in X_{j}$, and two different edges of $G$ are replaced by non-adjacent edges of $G_{I}$. For integer $k\geq 1$, the $k$-tuple total domination number $\gamma_{\times k,t}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a $k$-tuple total dominating set of $G$, which is a set of vertices in $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least $k$ vertices in it. For existing this number, must the minimum degree of $G$ is at least $k$. Here, we study the $k$-tuple total domination number in inflated graphs when $k\geq 2$. First we prove that $n(G)k\leq \gamma_{\times k,t}(G_{I})\leq n(G)(k+1)-1$, and then we characterize graphs $G$ that the $k$-tuple total domination number number of $G_I$ is $n(G)k$ or $n(G)k+1$. Then we find bounds for this number in the inflated graph $G_I$, when $G$ has a cut-edge $e$ or cut-vertex $v$, in terms on the $k$-tuple total domination number of the inflated graphs of the components of $G-e$ or $v$-components of $G-v$, respectively. Finally, we calculate this number in the inflated graphs that have obtained by some of the known graphs

Edge Roman domination on graphs

An edge Roman dominating function of a graph $G$ is a function $f\colon E(G) \rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ satisfying the condition that every edge $e$ with $f(e)=0$ is adjacent to some edge $e'$ with $f(e')=2$. The edge Roman domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma'_R(G)$, is the minimum weight $w(f) = \sum_{e\in E(G)} f(e)$ of an edge Roman dominating function $f$ of $G$. This paper disproves a conjecture of Akbari, Ehsani, Ghajar, Jalaly Khalilabadi and Sadeghian Sadeghabad stating that if $G$ is a graph of maximum degree $\Delta$ on $n$ vertices, then $\gamma_R'(G) \le \lceil \frac{\Delta}{\Delta+1} n \rceil$. While the counterexamples having the edge Roman domination numbers $\frac{2\Delta-2}{2\Delta-1} n$, we prove that $\frac{2\Delta-2}{2\Delta-1} n + \frac{2}{2\Delta-1}$ is an upper bound for connected graphs. Furthermore, we provide an upper bound for the edge Roman domination number of $k$-degenerate graphs, which generalizes results of Akbari, Ehsani, Ghajar, Jalaly Khalilabadi and Sadeghian Sadeghabad. We also prove a sharp upper bound for subcubic graphs. In addition, we prove that the edge Roman domination numbers of planar graphs on $n$ vertices is at most $\frac{6}{7}n$, which confirms a conjecture of Akbari and Qajar. We also show an upper bound for graphs of girth at least five that is 2-cell embeddable in surfaces of small genus. Finally, we prove an upper bound for graphs that do not contain $K_{2,3}$ as a subdivision, which generalizes a result of Akbari and Qajar on outerplanar graphs

The k-tuple domination number revisited

The following fundamental result for the domination number γ (G) of a graph G was proved by Alon and Spencer, Arnautov, Lovász and Payan: γ (G) ≤ frac(ln (δ + 1) + 1, δ + 1) n, where n is the order and δ is the minimum degree of vertices of G. A similar upper bound for the double domination number was found by Harant and Henning [J. Harant, M.A. Henning, On double domination in graphs, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 25 (2005) 29-34], and for the triple domination number by Rautenbach and Volkmann [D. Rautenbach, L. Volkmann, New bounds on the k-domination number and the k-tuple domination number, Appl. Math. Lett. 20 (2007) 98-102], who also posed the interesting conjecture on the k-tuple domination number: for any graph G with δ ≥ k - 1, γ× k (G) ≤ frac(ln (δ - k + 2) + ln (over(d, ̂)k - 1 + over(d, ̂)k - 2) + 1, δ - k + 2) n, where over(d, ̂)m = ∑i = 1n ((di; m)) / n is the m-degree of G. This conjecture, if true, would generalize all the mentioned upper bounds and improve an upper bound proved in [A. Gagarin, V. Zverovich, A generalised upper bound for the k-tuple domination number, Discrete Math. (2007), in press (doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.07.033)]. In this paper, we prove the Rautenbach-Volkmann conjecture. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

DOWNHILL DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

A path π = (v1, v2, . . . , vk+1) iun a graph G = (V, E) is a downhill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(vi) ≥ deg(vi+1), where deg(vi) denotes the degree of vertex vi ∈ V. The downhill domination number equals the minimum cardinality of a set S ⊆ V having the property that every vertex v ∈ V lies on a downhill path originating from some vertex in S. We investigate downhill domination numbers of graphs and give upper bounds. In particular, we show that the downhill domination number of a graph is at most half its order, and that the downhill domination number of a tree is at most one third its order. We characterize the graphs obtaining each of these bounds

General Bounds on the Downhill Domination Number in Graphs.

A path π = (v1, v2,...vk+1) in a graph G = (V,E) is a downhill path if for every i, 1 \u3c i \u3c k, deg(vi) \u3e deg(vi+1), where deg(vi) denotes the degree of vertex vi ∊ V. The downhill domination number equals the minimum cardinality of a set S ⊂ V having the property that every vertex v ∊ V lies on a downhill path originating from some vertex in S. We investigate downhill domination numbers of graphs and give upper bounds. In particular, we show that the downhill domination number of a graph is at most half its order, and that the downhill domination number of a tree is at most one third its order. We characterize the graphs obtaining each of these bounds

Uphill & Downhill Domination in Graphs and Related Graph Parameters.

Placing degree constraints on the vertices of a path allows the definitions of uphill and downhill paths. Specifically, we say that a path π = v1, v2,...vk+1 is a downhill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(vi) ≥ deg(vi+1). Conversely, a path π = u1, u2,...uk+1 is an uphill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(ui) ≤ deg(ui+1). We investigate graphical parameters related to downhill and uphill paths in graphs. For example, a downhill path set is a set P of vertex disjoint downhill paths such that every vertex v ∈ V belongs to at least one path in P, and the downhill path number is the minimum cardinality of a downhill path set of G. For another example, the downhill domination number of a graph G is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every vertex in V lies on a downhill path from some vertex in S. The uphill domination number is defined as expected. We determine relationships among these invariants and other graphical parameters related to downhill and uphill paths. We also give a polynomial time algorithm to find a minimum downhill dominating set and a minimum uphill dominating set for any graph