On Optimization Modulo Theories, MaxSMT and Sorting Networks

Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) is an extension of SMT which allows for finding models that optimize given objectives. (Partial weighted) MaxSMT --or equivalently OMT with Pseudo-Boolean objective functions, OMT+PB-- is a very-relevant strict subcase of OMT. We classify existing approaches for MaxSMT or OMT+PB in two groups: MaxSAT-based approaches exploit the efficiency of state-of-the-art MAXSAT solvers, but they are specific-purpose and not always applicable; OMT-based approaches are general-purpose, but they suffer from intrinsic inefficiencies on MaxSMT/OMT+PB problems. We identify a major source of such inefficiencies, and we address it by enhancing OMT by means of bidirectional sorting networks. We implemented this idea on top of the OptiMathSAT OMT solver. We run an extensive empirical evaluation on a variety of problems, comparing MaxSAT-based and OMT-based techniques, with and without sorting networks, implemented on top of OptiMathSAT and {\nu}Z. The results support the effectiveness of this idea, and provide interesting insights about the different approaches.Comment: 17 pages, submitted at Tacas 1

Artificial Intelligence for Automated Design of Elevator Systems

Configuration and design of complex products represents a challenge in many application fields. The designer must take into account many different aspects and make decisions typically driven by experience while taking into account performance constraints and costs. Methods and tools for design automation represents a viable solution to such complex decision problems, giving also the possibility to optimize the performance of the final product on particular context-driven aspects. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can help in dealing with complexity and enhance the current tools by supplying solutions in feasible time. My research is concerned with the development and testing of different artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automate the design of elevators. Elevator design is a problem with many interesting aspects like the need to deal with a hybrid search state space (continuous and discrete variables) constrained by design requirements and safety regulations. The study, design and integration of AI techniques in this particular application field can provide the end user with design automation tools that output feasible solutions within acceptable computation times. My research considered AI techniques such as special-purpose heuristic search, genetic algorithms and constraint satisfaction to solve elevator configuration problems. I tested them considering different setups and parts of the whole design process. I have also implemented a tool L IFT C REATE , available as a web application. L IFT C REATE leverages the findings of my research to automate the design of elevators and, to the best of my knowledge, there is currently no similar tool publicly available from either academia or industry that provides the same level of design automation

Refined Core Relaxations for Core-Guided Maximum Satisfiability Algorithms

The so-called declarative approach has proven to be a viable paradigm for solving various real-world NP-hard optimization problems in practice. In the declarative approach, the problem at hand is encoded using a mathematical constraint language, and an algorithm for the specific language is employed to obtain optimal solutions to an instance of the problem. One of the most viable declarative optimization paradigms of the last years is maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) with propositional logic as the constraint language. So-called core-guided MaxSAT algorithms are arguably one of the most effective MaxSAT-solving paradigms in practice today. Core-guided algorithms iteratively detect and rule out (relax) sources of inconsistencies (so-called unsatisfiable cores) in the instance being solved. Especially effective are recent algorithmic variants of the core-guided approach which employ so-called soft cardinality constraints for ruling out inconsistencies. In this thesis, we present a structure-sharing technique for the cardinality-based core relaxation steps performed by core-guided MaxSAT solvers. The technique aims at reducing the inherent growth in the size of the propositional formula resulting from the core relaxation steps. Additionally, it enables more efficient reasoning over the relationships between different cores. We empirically evaluate the proposed technique on two different core-guided algorithms and provide open-source implementations of our solvers employing the technique. Our results show that the proposed structure-sharing can improve the performance of the algorithms both in theory and in practice

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 10980 and 10981 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2018, held in Oxford, UK, in July 2018. The 52 full and 13 tool papers presented together with 3 invited papers and 2 tutorials were carefully reviewed and selected from 215 submissions. The papers cover a wide range of topics and techniques, from algorithmic and logical foundations of verification to practical applications in distributed, networked, cyber-physical, and autonomous systems. They are organized in topical sections on model checking, program analysis using polyhedra, synthesis, learning, runtime verification, hybrid and timed systems, tools, probabilistic systems, static analysis, theory and security, SAT, SMT and decisions procedures, concurrency, and CPS, hardware, industrial applications

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 11561 and 11562 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2019, held in New York City, USA, in July 2019. The 52 full papers presented together with 13 tool papers and 2 case studies, were carefully reviewed and selected from 258 submissions. The papers were organized in the following topical sections: Part I: automata and timed systems; security and hyperproperties; synthesis; model checking; cyber-physical systems and machine learning; probabilistic systems, runtime techniques; dynamical, hybrid, and reactive systems; Part II: logics, decision procedures; and solvers; numerical programs; verification; distributed systems and networks; verification and invariants; and concurrency

Solving Optimization Problems via Maximum Satisfiability : Encodings and Re-Encodings

NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems are commonly encountered in numerous different domains. As such efficient methods for solving instances of such problems can save time, money, and other resources in several different applications. This thesis investigates exact declarative approaches to combinatorial optimization within the maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) paradigm, using propositional logic as the constraint language of choice. Specifically we contribute to both MaxSAT solving and encoding techniques. In the first part of the thesis we contribute to MaxSAT solving technology by developing solver independent MaxSAT preprocessing techniques that re-encode MaxSAT instances into other instances. In order for preprocessing to be effective, the total time spent re-encoding the original instance and solving the new instance should be lower than the time required to directly solve the original instance. We show how the recently proposed label-based framework for MaxSAT preprocessing can be efficiently integrated with state-of-art MaxSAT solvers in a way that improves the empirical performance of those solvers. We also investigate the theoretical effect that label-based preprocessing has on the number of iterations needed by MaxSAT solvers in order to solve instances. We show that preprocessing does not improve best-case performance (in the number of iterations) of MaxSAT solvers, but can improve the worst-case performance. Going beyond previously proposed preprocessing rules we also propose and evaluate a MaxSAT-specific preprocessing technique called subsumed label elimination (SLE). We show that SLE is theoretically different from previously proposed MaxSAT preprocessing rules and that using SLE in conjunction with other preprocessing rules improves empirical performance of several MaxSAT solvers. In the second part of the thesis we propose and evaluate new MaxSAT encodings to two important data analysis tasks: correlation clustering and bounded treewidth Bayesian network learning. For both problems we empirically evaluate the resulting MaxSAT-based solution approach with other exact algorithms for the problems. We show that, on many benchmarks, the MaxSAT-based approach is faster and more memory efficient than other exact approaches. For correlation clustering, we also show that the quality of solutions obtained using MaxSAT is often significantly higher than the quality of solutions obtained by approximative (inexact) algorithms. We end the thesis with a discussion highlighting possible further research directions.Kombinatorinen optimointi on laajasti tutkittu matematiikan ja tietojenkäsittelytieteen osa-alue. Kombinatorisissa optimointiongelmissa diskreetin ratkaisujen joukon yli määritelty kustannusfunktio määrittää kunkin ratkaisun hyvyyden. Tehtävänä on löytää sallittujen ratkaisujen joukosta kustannusfunktion mukaan paras mahdollinen. Esimerkiksi niin sanotussa kauppamatkustajan ongelmassa annettuna joukko kaupunkeja tavoitteena on löytää lyhin mahdollinen reitti, jota kulkemalla voidaan käydä kaikissa kaupungeissa. Kauppamatkustajan ongelma sekä monet muut kombinatoriset optimointiongelmat ovat laskennallisesti haastavia, tarkemmin ilmaistuna NP-vaikeita. Haastavia kombinatorisia optimointiongelmia esiintyy monilla eri tieteen ja teollisuuden aloilla; esimerkiksi useat koneoppimiseen liittyvät ongelmat voidaan esittää kombinatorisina optimointiongelmina. Kombinatoristen optimointiongelmien moninaisuus motivoi tehokkaiden ratkaisualgoritmien kehitystä. Väitöskirjassa kehitetään deklaratiivisia ratkaisumenetelmiä NP-vaikeille optimointiongelmille. Deklaratiivinen ratkaisumenetelmä olettaa, että ratkaistavalle ongelmalle on olemassa jonkin matemaattisen rajoitekielen rajoitemalli, joka kuvaa kunkin ongelman instanssin joukkona matemaattisia rajoitteita siten, että kunkin rajoiteinstanssin optimaalinen ratkaisu voidaan tulkita alkuperäisen ongelman optimaalisena ratkaisuna. Deklaratiivisessa ratkaisumenetelmässä ratkaistavan optimointiongelman instanssi ratkaistaan kuvaamalla ensin instanssi rajoitemallilla joukoksi rajoitteita ja ratkaisemalla sitten rajoiteinstanssi rajoitekielen ratkaisualgoritmilla. Työssä käytetään lauselogiikkaa rajoitekielenä ja keskitytään lauselogiikan toteutuvuusongelman (SAT) laajennukseen optimointiongelmille. Tätä ongelmaa kutsutaan nimellä MaxSAT. Työssä kehitetään sekä sekä yleisiä MaxSAT-ratkaisumenetelmiä että MaxSAT-malleja tietyille koneoppimiseen liittyville optimointiongelmille. Väitöskirjan keskeiset kontribuutiot esitellään kahdessa osassa. Ensimmäisessä osassa kehitetään MaxSAT-ratkaisumenetelmiä, tarkemmin sanottuna MaxSAT-esikäsittelymenetelmiä. Esikäsittelymenetelmät ovat tehokkaasti laskettavissa olevia päättelysääntöjä (esikäsittelysääntöjä), joita käyttämällä annettuja MaxSAT-instansseja voidaan yksinkertaistaa. Esikäsittelyn tavoitteena on tehdä MaxSAT-instansseista helpommin ratkaistavia käytännössä. Väitöstyössä: i) esitellään tapa integroida keskeiset lauselogiikan toteutuvuusongelman esikäsittelysäännöt nykyaikaisiin MaxSAT-ratkaisualgoritmeihin ii) analysoidaan esikäsittelyn vaikutusta ratkaisualgoritmien käyttäytymiseen ja iii) esitellään uusi MaxSAT-esikäsittelysääntö. Kaikkia kontribuutioita MaxSAT-esikäsittelyyn analysoidaan sekä teoreettisella että kokeellisella tasolla. Kirjan toisessa osassa kehitetään MaxSAT-malleja kahdelle koneoppimiseen liittyvälle optimointiongelmalle: korrelaatioklusteroinnille ja Bayes-verkkojen rakenteenoppimisongelmalle. Kehitettäviä malleja analysoidaan sekä teoreettisesti, että kokeellisesti. Teoreettisella tasolla mallit todistetaan oikeellisiksi. Kokeellisella tasolla osoitetaan, että mallit mahdollistavat alkuperäisten ongelmien instanssien tehokkaan ratkaisemisen aiemmin näille ongelmille esiteltyihin eksakteihin ratkaisualgoritmeihin verrattuna

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS 2022, which was held during April 2-7, 2022, in Munich, Germany, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2022. The 46 full papers and 4 short papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 159 submissions. The proceedings also contain 16 tool papers of the affiliated competition SV-Comp and 1 paper consisting of the competition report. TACAS is a forum for researchers, developers, and users interested in rigorously based tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems. The conference aims to bridge the gaps between different communities with this common interest and to support them in their quest to improve the utility, reliability, exibility, and efficiency of tools and algorithms for building computer-controlled systems

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 11561 and 11562 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2019, held in New York City, USA, in July 2019. The 52 full papers presented together with 13 tool papers and 2 case studies, were carefully reviewed and selected from 258 submissions. The papers were organized in the following topical sections: Part I: automata and timed systems; security and hyperproperties; synthesis; model checking; cyber-physical systems and machine learning; probabilistic systems, runtime techniques; dynamical, hybrid, and reactive systems; Part II: logics, decision procedures; and solvers; numerical programs; verification; distributed systems and networks; verification and invariants; and concurrency