36 research outputs found

    Laplacian Distribution and Domination

    Get PDF
    Let mG(I)m_G(I) denote the number of Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph GG in an interval II, and let γ(G)\gamma(G) denote its domination number. We extend the recent result mG[0,1)γ(G)m_G[0,1) \leq \gamma(G), and show that isolate-free graphs also satisfy γ(G)mG[2,n]\gamma(G) \leq m_G[2,n]. In pursuit of better understanding Laplacian eigenvalue distribution, we find applications for these inequalities. We relate these spectral parameters with the approximability of γ(G)\gamma(G), showing that γ(G)mG[0,1)∉O(logn)\frac{\gamma(G)}{m_G[0,1)} \not\in O(\log n). However, γ(G)mG[2,n](c+1)γ(G)\gamma(G) \leq m_G[2, n] \leq (c + 1) \gamma(G) for cc-cyclic graphs, c1c \geq 1. For trees TT, γ(T)mT[2,n]2γ(G)\gamma(T) \leq m_T[2, n] \leq 2 \gamma(G)

    An inertial lower bound for the chromatic number of a graph

    Full text link
    Let χ(G\chi(G) and χf(G)\chi_f(G) denote the chromatic and fractional chromatic numbers of a graph GG, and let (n+,n0,n)(n^+ , n^0 , n^-) denote the inertia of GG. We prove that: 1 + \max\left(\frac{n^+}{n^-} , \frac{n^-}{n^+}\right) \le \chi(G) \mbox{ and conjecture that } 1 + \max\left(\frac{n^+}{n^-} , \frac{n^-}{n^+}\right) \le \chi_f(G) We investigate extremal graphs for these bounds and demonstrate that this inertial bound is not a lower bound for the vector chromatic number. We conclude with a discussion of asymmetry between n+n^+ and nn^-, including some Nordhaus-Gaddum bounds for inertia

    On incidence energy of a graph

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe Laplacian-energy like invariant LEL(G) and the incidence energy IE(G) of a graph are recently proposed quantities, equal, respectively, to the sum of the square roots of the Laplacian eigenvalues, and the sum of the singular values of the incidence matrix of the graph G. However, IE(G) is closely related with the eigenvalues of the Laplacian and signless Laplacian matrices of G. For bipartite graphs, IE=LEL. We now point out some further relations for IE and LEL: IE can be expressed in terms of eigenvalues of the line graph, whereas LEL in terms of singular values of the incidence matrix of a directed graph. Several lower and upper bounds for IE are obtained, including those that pertain to the line graph of G. In addition, Nordhaus–Gaddum-type results for IE are established

    Bounds of the Spectral Radius and the Nordhaus-Gaddum Type of the Graphs

    Get PDF
    The Laplacian spectra are the eigenvalues of Laplacian matrix L(G)=D(G)-A(G), where D(G) and A(G) are the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of a graph G, respectively, and the spectral radius of a graph G is the largest eigenvalue of A(G). The spectra of the graph and corresponding eigenvalues are closely linked to the molecular stability and related chemical properties. In quantum chemistry, spectral radius of a graph is the maximum energy level of molecules. Therefore, good upper bounds for the spectral radius are conducive to evaluate the energy of molecules. In this paper, we first give several sharp upper bounds on the adjacency spectral radius in terms of some invariants of graphs, such as the vertex degree, the average 2-degree, and the number of the triangles. Then, we give some numerical examples which indicate that the results are better than the mentioned upper bounds in some sense. Finally, an upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type is obtained for the sum of Laplacian spectral radius of a connected graph and its complement. Moreover, some examples are applied to illustrate that our result is valuable

    Bounds on Kemeny's constant of a graph and the Nordhaus-Gaddum problem

    Full text link
    We study Nordhaus-Gaddum problems for Kemeny's constant K(G)\mathcal{K}(G) of a connected graph GG. We prove bounds on min{K(G),K(G)}\min\{\mathcal{K}(G),\mathcal{K}(\overline{G})\} and the product K(G)K(G)\mathcal{K}(G)\mathcal{K}(\overline{G}) for various families of graphs. In particular, we show that if the maximum degree of a graph GG on nn vertices is nO(1)n-O(1) or nΩ(n)n-\Omega(n), then min{K(G),K(G)}\min\{\mathcal{K}(G),\mathcal{K}(\overline{G})\} is at most O(n)O(n)

    Beyond graph energy: norms of graphs and matrices

    Full text link
    In 1978 Gutman introduced the energy of a graph as the sum of the absolute values of graph eigenvalues, and ever since then graph energy has been intensively studied. Since graph energy is the trace norm of the adjacency matrix, matrix norms provide a natural background for its study. Thus, this paper surveys research on matrix norms that aims to expand and advance the study of graph energy. The focus is exclusively on the Ky Fan and the Schatten norms, both generalizing and enriching the trace norm. As it turns out, the study of extremal properties of these norms leads to numerous analytic problems with deep roots in combinatorics. The survey brings to the fore the exceptional role of Hadamard matrices, conference matrices, and conference graphs in matrix norms. In addition, a vast new matrix class is studied, a relaxation of symmetric Hadamard matrices. The survey presents solutions to just a fraction of a larger body of similar problems bonding analysis to combinatorics. Thus, open problems and questions are raised to outline topics for further investigation.Comment: 54 pages. V2 fixes many typos, and gives some new materia

    New upper bounds for Laplacian energy

    Get PDF
    Abstract We obtain upper bounds and Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results for the Laplacian energy. The bounds in terms of the number of vertices are asymptotically best possible

    Proximity and Remoteness in Graphs: a survey

    Full text link
    The proximity π=π(G)\pi = \pi (G) of a connected graph GG is the minimum, over all vertices, of the average distance from a vertex to all others. Similarly, the maximum is called the remoteness and denoted by ρ=ρ(G)\rho = \rho (G). The concepts of proximity and remoteness, first defined in 2006, attracted the attention of several researchers in Graph Theory. Their investigation led to a considerable number of publications. In this paper, we present a survey of the research work.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1204.1184 by other author
    corecore