Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection

[EN] Random events make multiobjective programming solutions vulnerable to changes in input data. In many cases statistically quantifiable information on variability of relevant parameters may not be available for decision making. This situation gives rise to the problem of obtaining solutions based on subjective beliefs and a priori risk aversion to random changes. To solve this problem, we propose to replace the traditional weighted goal programming achievement function with a new function that considers the decision maker's perception of the randomness associated with implementing the solution through the use of a penalty term. This new function also implements the level of a priori risk aversion based around the decision maker's beliefs and perceptions. The proposed new formulation is illustrated by means of a variant of the mean absolute deviation portfolio selection model. As a result, difficulties imposed by the absence of statistical information about random events can be encompassed by a modification of the achievement function to pragmatically consider subjective beliefs.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. s This work is devoted to the memory of Professor Enrique Ballestero for his selfess dedication to it.Bravo Selles, M.; Jones, D.; Pla Santamaría, D.; Salas-Molina, F. (2022). Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection. Operational Research (Online). 22(5):5685-5706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-022-00713-156855706225Abdelaziz FB, Aouni B, El Fayedh R (2007) Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1811–1823Abdelaziz FB, El Fayedh R, Rao A (2009) A discrete stochastic goal program for portfolio selection: the case of united arab emirates equity market. INFOR Inf Syst Op Res 47(1):5–13Aouni B, La Torre D (2010) A generalized stochastic goal programming model. Appl Math Comput 215(12):4347–4357Aouni B, Ben Abdelaziz F, La Torre D (2012) The stochastic goal programming model: theory and applications. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 19(5–6):185–200Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Academic Bookstore, HelsinkiBallestero E (1997) Utility functions: a compromise programming approach to specification and optimization. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6(1):11–16Ballestero E (2001) Stochastic goal programming: a mean-variance approach. Eur J Op Res 131(3):476–481Ballestero E, Pla-Santamaria D (2004) Selecting portfolios for mutual funds. Omega 32(5):385–394Ballestero E, Romero C (1998) Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economic problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtBallestero E, Bravo M, Pérez-Gladish B, Arenas-Parra M, Pla-Santamaria D (2012) Socially responsible investment: a multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. Eur J Op Res 216(2):487–494Bhamra HS, Uppal R (2006) The role of risk aversion and intertemporal substitution in dynamic consumption-portfolio choice with recursive utility. J Econ Dyn Control 30(6):967–991Bilbao-Terol A, Jiménez M, Arenas-Parra M (2016) A group decision making model based on goal programming with fuzzy hierarchy: an application to regional forest planning. Ann Op Res 245(1–2):137–162Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Slowiński R (2008) Multiobjective optimization: interactive and evolutionary approaches. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinBravo M, Gonzalez I (2009) Applying stochastic goal programming: a case study on water use planning. Eur J Op Res 196(3):1123–1129Charnes A, Collomb B (1972) Optimal economic stabilization policy: linear goal-programming models. Soc-Econ Plan Sci 6:431–435Charnes A, Cooper WW (1957) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Manag Sci 4(1):38–91Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1955) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151Cheridito P, Summer C (2006) Utility maximization under increasing risk aversion in one-period models. Finance Stoch 10(1):147–158Choobineh M, Mohagheghi S (2016) A multi-objective optimization framework for energy and asset management in an industrial microgrid. J Clean Prod 139:1326–1338Debreu G (1960) Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Standford University Press, StandfordDíaz-Madroñero M, Mula J, Jiménez M (2014) Fuzzy goal programming for material requirements planning under uncertainty and integrity conditions. Int J Prod Res 52(23):6971–6988Elbasha EH (2005) Risk aversion and uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: the expected-utility, moment-generating function approach. Health Econ 14(5):457–470Ewald CO, Yang Z (2008) Utility based pricing and exercising of real options under geometric mean reversion and risk aversion toward idiosyncratic risk. Math Methods Op Res 68(1):97–123Gass SI (1986) A process for determining priorities and weights for large-scale linear goal programmes. J Op Res Soc 37(8):779–785Ghahtarani A, Najafi AA (2013) Robust goal programming for multi-objective portfolio selection problem. Econ Model 33:588–592Gollier C (2001) The economics of risk and time. MIT press, CambridgeGonzález-Pachón J, Romero C (2016) Bentham, Marx and Rawls ethical principles: in search for a compromise. Omega 62:47–51González-Pachón J, Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2019) A multi-criteria approach for assigning weights in voting systems. Soft Comput 23(17):8181–8186Grigoroudis E, Orfanoudaki E, Zopounidis C (2012) Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: a multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega 40(1):104–119Hanks RW, Weir JD, Lunday BJ (2017) Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets. Eur J Op Res 262(2):636–646Ignizio JP (1999) Illusions of optimality. Eng Optim 31(6):749–761Jiménez M, Bilbao-Terol A, Arenas-Parra M (2018) A model for solving incompatible fuzzy goal programming: an application to portfolio selection. Int Trans Op Res 25(3):887–912Johansson-Stenman O (2010) Risk aversion and expected utility of consumption over time. Games Econ Behav 68(1):208–219Jones D (2011) A practical weight sensitivity algorithm for goal and multiple objective programming. Eur J Op Res 213(1):238–245Jones D, Tamiz M (2010) Practical goal programming. Springer, New YorkKallberg JG, Ziemba WT (1983) Comparison of alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems. Manag Sci 29(11):1257–1276Kihlstrom R (2009) Risk aversion and the elasticity of substitution in general dynamic portfolio theory: consistent planning by forward looking, expected utility maximizing investors. J Math Econ 45(9–10):634–663Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, Granger BE, Bussonnier M, Frederic J, Kelley K, Hamrick JB, Grout J, Corlay S, et al (2016) Jupyter notebooks-a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: ELPUB, pp. 87–90Konno H, Yamazaki H (1991) Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to tokyo stock market. Manag Sci 37(5):519–531Kraft D (1988) A software package for sequential quadratic programming. Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raumfahrt 28Krantz D, Luce D, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of measurement: geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations. Academic Press, New YorkKuchta D (2004) Robust goal programming. Control Cybern 33(3):501–510Langlais E (2005) Willingness to pay for risk reduction and risk aversion without the expected utility assumption. Theory Decis 59(1):43–50Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91Masri H (2017) A multiple stochastic goal programming approach for the agent portfolio selection problem. Ann Op Res 251(1–2):179–192Matthews LR, Guzman YA, Floudas CA (2018) Generalized robust counterparts for constraints with bounded and unbounded uncertain parameters. Comput Chem Eng 116:451–467McCarl BA, Bessler DA (1989) Estimating an upper bound on the pratt risk a version coefficient when the utility function is unknown. Aust J Agric Econ 33:56Messaoudi L, Aouni B, Rebai A (2017) Fuzzy chance-constrained goal programming model for multi-attribute financial portfolio selection. Ann Op Res 251(1–2):193–204Miettinen K, Ruiz F, Wierzbicki AP (2008) Introduction to multiobjective optimization: interactive approaches. In: Multiobjective Optimization. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–57Muñoz MM, Ruiz F (2009) ISTMO: an interval reference point-based method for stochastic multiobjective programming problems. Eur J Op Res 197(1):25–35Muñoz MM, Luque M, Ruiz F (2010) Interest: a reference-point-based interactive procedure for stochastic multiobjective programming problems. OR Spectr 32(1):195–210Oliveira R, Zanella A, Camanho AS (2019) The assessment of corporate social responsibility: the construction of an industry ranking and identification of potential for improvement. Eur J Op Res 278(2):498–513Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1–2):122–136Romero C (1991) Handbook of critical issues in goal programming. Pergamon Press, OxfordSalas-Molina F, Rodríguez-Aguilar JA, Pla-Santamaria D (2018) Boundless multiobjective models for cash management. Eng Econ 63(4):363–381Schechter L (2007) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration exercise. J Risk Uncertain 35(1):67–76Tamiz M, Jones D (1996) Goal programming and pareto efficiency. J Inf Optim Sci 17(2):291–307Tsionas MG (2019) Multi-objective optimization using statistical models. Eur J Op Res 276(1):364–378Woerheide W, Persson D (1993) An index of portfolio diversification. Financ Serv Rev 2(2):73–85Xu Y, Yeh CH (2012) An integrated approach to evaluation and planning of best practices. Omega 40(1):65–78Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–35

Toward optimal multi-objective models of network security: Survey

Information security is an important aspect of a successful business today. However, financial difficulties and budget cuts create a problem of selecting appropriate security measures and keeping networked systems up and running. Economic models proposed in the literature do not address the challenging problem of security countermeasure selection. We have made a classification of security models, which can be used to harden a system in a cost effective manner based on the methodologies used. In addition, we have specified the challenges of the simplified risk assessment approaches used in the economic models and have made recommendations how the challenges can be addressed in order to support decision makers

Automatic inference of fault tree models via multi-objective evolutionary algorithms

Fault tree analysis is a well-known technique in reliability engineering and risk assessment, which supports decision-making processes and the management of complex systems. Traditionally, fault tree (FT) models are built manually together with domain experts, considered a time-consuming process prone to human errors. With Industry 4.0, there is an increasing availability of inspection and monitoring data, making techniques that enable knowledge extraction from large data sets relevant. Thus, our goal with this work is to propose a data-driven approach to infer efficient FT structures that achieve a complete representation of the failure mechanisms contained in the failure data set without human intervention. Our algorithm, the FT-MOEA, based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, enables the simultaneous optimization of different relevant metrics such as the FT size, the error computed based on the failure data set and the Minimal Cut Sets. Our results show that, for six case studies from the literature, our approach successfully achieved automatic, efficient, and consistent inference of the associated FT models. We also present the results of a parametric analysis that tests our algorithm for different relevant conditions that influence its performance, as well as an overview of the data-driven methods used to automatically infer FT models

Towards optimal multi-objective models of network security: survey

Information security is an important aspect of a successful business today. However, financial difficulties and budget cuts create a problem of selecting appropriate security measures and keeping networked systems up and running. Economic models proposed in the literature do not address the challenging problem of security countermeasure selection. We have made a classification of security models, which can be used to harden a system in a cost effective manner based on the methodologies used. In addition, we have specified the challenges of the simplified risk assessment approaches used in the economic models and have made recommendations how the challenges can be addressed in order to support decision makers

A review of portfolio planning: Models and systems

In this chapter, we first provide an overview of a number of portfolio planning models which have been proposed and investigated over the last forty years. We revisit the mean-variance (M-V) model of Markowitz and the construction of the risk-return efficient frontier. A piecewise linear approximation of the problem through a reformulation involving diagonalisation of the quadratic form into a variable separable function is also considered. A few other models, such as, the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), the Weighted Goal Programming (WGP) and the Minimax (MM) model which use alternative metrics for risk are also introduced, compared and contrasted. Recently asymmetric measures of risk have gained in importance; we consider a generic representation and a number of alternative symmetric and asymmetric measures of risk which find use in the evaluation of portfolios. There are a number of modelling and computational considerations which have been introduced into practical portfolio planning problems. These include: (a) buy-in thresholds for assets, (b) restriction on the number of assets (cardinality constraints), (c) transaction roundlot restrictions. Practical portfolio models may also include (d) dedication of cashflow streams, and, (e) immunization which involves duration matching and convexity constraints. The modelling issues in respect of these features are discussed. Many of these features lead to discrete restrictions involving zero-one and general integer variables which make the resulting model a quadratic mixed-integer programming model (QMIP). The QMIP is a NP-hard problem; the algorithms and solution methods for this class of problems are also discussed. The issues of preparing the analytic data (financial datamarts) for this family of portfolio planning problems are examined. We finally present computational results which provide some indication of the state-of-the-art in the solution of portfolio optimisation problems

Stochastic multi-period multi-product multi-objective Aggregate Production Planning model in multi-echelon supply chain

In this paper a multi-period multi-product multi-objective aggregate production planning (APP) model is proposed for an uncertain multi-echelon supply chain considering financial risk, customer satisfaction, and human resource training. Three conflictive objective functions and several sets of real constraints are considered concurrently in the proposed APP model. Some parameters of the proposed model are assumed to be uncertain and handled through a two-stage stochastic programming (TSSP) approach. The proposed TSSP is solved using three multi-objective solution procedures, i.e., the goal attainment technique, the modified ε-constraint method, and STEM method. The whole procedure is applied in an automotive resin and oil supply chain as a real case study wherein the efficacy and applicability of the proposed approaches are illustrated in comparison with existing experimental production planning method

On green routing and scheduling problem

The vehicle routing and scheduling problem has been studied with much interest within the last four decades. In this paper, some of the existing literature dealing with routing and scheduling problems with environmental issues is reviewed, and a description is provided of the problems that have been investigated and how they are treated using combinatorial optimization tools

Water Supply Planning under Interdependence of Actions: Theory and Application

An ongoing water supply planning problem in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, is studied to select the best water supply combination, within a multiple-objective framework, when actions are interdependent. The interdependencies in the problem are described and shown to be essential features. The problem is formulated as a multiple-criteria integer program with interdependent actions. Because of the large number of potential actions and the nonconvexity of the decision space, it is quite difficult to find nondominated subsets of actions. Instead, a modified goal programming technique is suggested to identify promising subsets. The appropriateness of this technique is explained, and the lessons learned in applying it to the Waterloo water supply planning problem are described