Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing

The contents and structure of semantic memory have been the focus of much recent research, with major advances in the development of distributional models, which use word co-occurrence information as a window into the semantics of language. In parallel, connectionist modeling has extended our knowledge of the processes engaged in semantic activation. However, these two lines of investigation have rarely been brought together. Here, we describe a processing model based on distributional semantics in which activation spreads throughout a semantic network, as dictated by the patterns of semantic similarity between words. We show that the activation profile of the network, measured at various time points, can successfully account for response times in lexical and semantic decision tasks, as well as for subjective concreteness and imageability ratings. We also show that the dynamics of the network is predictive of performance in relational semantic tasks, such as similarity/relatedness rating. Our results indicate that bringing together distributional semantic networks and spreading of activation provides a good fit to both automatic lexical processing (as indexed by lexical and semantic decisions) as well as more deliberate processing (as indexed by ratings), above and beyond what has been reported for previous models that take into account only similarity resulting from network structure

Computational explorations of semantic cognition

Motivated by the widespread use of distributional models of semantics within the cognitive science community, we follow a computational modelling approach in order to better understand and expand the applicability of such models, as well as to test potential ways in which they can be improved and extended. We review evidence in favour of the assumption that distributional models capture important aspects of semantic cognition. We look at the models’ ability to account for behavioural data and fMRI patterns of brain activity, and investigate the structure of model-based, semantic networks. We test whether introducing affective information, obtained from a neural network model designed to predict emojis from co-occurring text, can improve the performance of linguistic and linguistic-visual models of semantics, in accounting for similarity/relatedness ratings. We find that adding visual and affective representations improves performance, especially for concrete and abstract words, respectively. We describe a processing model based on distributional semantics, in which activation spreads throughout a semantic network, as dictated by the patterns of semantic similarity between words. We show that the activation profile of the network, measured at various time points, can account for response time and accuracies in lexical and semantic decision tasks, as well as for concreteness/imageability and similarity/relatedness ratings. We evaluate the differences between concrete and abstract words, in terms of the structure of the semantic networks derived from distributional models of semantics. We examine how the structure is related to a number of factors that have been argued to differ between concrete and abstract words, namely imageability, age of acquisition, hedonic valence, contextual diversity, and semantic diversity. We use distributional models to explore factors that might be responsible for the poor linguistic performance of children suffering from Developmental Language Disorder. Based on the assumption that certain model parameters can be given a psychological interpretation, we start from “healthy” models, and generate “lesioned” models, by manipulating the parameters. This allows us to determine the importance of each factor, and their effects with respect to learning concrete vs abstract words

How does rumination impact cognition? A first mechanistic model.

Rumination is a process of uncontrolled, narrowly-foused neg- ative thinking that is often self-referential, and that is a hall- mark of depression. Despite its importance, little is known about its cognitive mechanisms. Rumination can be thought of as a specific, constrained form of mind-wandering. Here, we introduce a cognitive model of rumination that we devel- oped on the basis of our existing model of mind-wandering. The rumination model implements the hypothesis that rumina- tion is caused by maladaptive habits of thought. These habits of thought are modelled by adjusting the number of memory chunks and their associative structure, which changes the se- quence of memories that are retrieved during mind-wandering, such that during rumination the same set of negative memo- ries is retrieved repeatedly. The implementation of habits of thought was guided by empirical data from an experience sam- pling study in healthy and depressed participants. On the ba- sis of this empirically-derived memory structure, our model naturally predicts the declines in cognitive task performance that are typically observed in depressed patients. This study demonstrates how we can use cognitive models to better un- derstand the cognitive mechanisms underlying rumination and depression

Attention Restraint, Working Memory Capacity, and Mind Wandering: Do Emotional Valence or Intentionality Matter?

Attention restraint appears to mediate the relationship between working memory capacity (WMC) and mind wandering (Kane et al., 2016). Prior work has identifed two dimensions of mind wandering—emotional valence and intentionality. However, less is known about how WMC and attention restraint correlate with these dimensions. Te current study examined the relationship between WMC, attention restraint, and mind wandering by emotional valence and intentionality. A confrmatory factor analysis demonstrated that WMC and attention restraint were strongly correlated, but only attention restraint was related to overall mind wandering, consistent with prior fndings. However, when examining the emotional valence of mind wandering, attention restraint and WMC were related to negatively and positively valenced, but not neutral, mind wandering. Attention restraint was also related to intentional but not unintentional mind wandering. Tese results suggest that WMC and attention restraint predict some, but not all, types of mind wandering