Is Mitral Valve Repair Safe Procedure in Elderly Patients?

The aim of this randomized, prospective, study was to evaluate postoperative hospital mortality and morbidity after mitral valve repair by comparing two surgical techniques for resolving mitral valve insufficiency in elderly patients. In comparison were: mitral valve repair vs. mitral valve replacement in patients older than 70 years. In period from January 1st 2006 until August 30th 2009. Eighty patients with mitral valve disease, isolated or associated with other co morbidities, were scheduled for mitral valve repair or mitral valve replacement in our institution. Patients were randomized in two groups, one scheduled for mitral valve repair and another one for mitral valve replacement using the envelope method with random numbers. Results show no difference in hospital mortality and morbidity postoperatively in both groups. In group undergoing valve replacement we had one significant complication of ventricle rupture in emphatically calcified posterior part of mitral valve annulus. In conclusion we found no distinction in postoperative hospital mortality and morbidity after using one of two surgical techniques

Preoperative predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction

Objective: Late outcome after mitral valve repair was examined to define preoperative predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction. Methods: One hundred and eighty-nine patients, 112 with preoperative sinus rhythm and 72 with preoperative chronic or intermittent atrial fibrillation, were followed for 12.2±10 years after valve repair. Clinic, hemodynamic end echocardiographic data were entered into Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meyer analysis to assess predictors for recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. Results: Univariate and multivariate predictors for recurrent atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve reconstruction were preoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.0001), preoperative antiarrhythmic drug treatment (P=0.005), heart rate (P=0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.01) and increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness (P=0.05). Patients>57.5 years with a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥23mm Hg and a history of preoperative antiarrhythmic drug treatment had an odds ratio of 53.33 (95% confidence limits 6.12-464.54) for atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. Conclusion: Older patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, antiarrhythmic treatment or an elevated pulmonary artery pressure may present atrial fibrillation late after successful mitral valve repair. They could be considered for combined mitral valve reconstruction and surgery for atrial fibrillation even though sinus rhythm is present preoperativel

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery II: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Management.

Techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement continue to evolve. This expert opinion, the second of a 3-part series, outlines current best practices for nonrobotic, minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, and for postoperative care after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

The Prevalence and Impact of Obesity on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair using MitraClip - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2016 to 2020.

Background: Low Body Mass Index (BMI) is associated with poor outcomes in patients who undergo various cardiac interventions. Studies on patients with elevated BMI have produced mixed results. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of obesity on the in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip in the United States. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016-2020) was analyzed to identify patients who underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip. Patients less than 18 years, with protein-energy malnutrition and rapid weight loss, were excluded. Our final study population was classified into Obese (BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m2) and Non-obese (Normal/Overweight) (BMI 0f 18.5 -29.9 Kg/m2) cohorts based on their Body Mass Index (BMI). The primary outcomes were the prevalence of obesity and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the rate of periprocedural complications, including cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury. Result: 40,950 patients underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip) during our study period. 7.8% were identified as obese. Obese patients were more likely to be female (50.6% vs. 43.9%, p Conclusions: Our study suggests obesity does not influence short-term in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip

The Neochord Procedure After Failed Surgical Mitral Valve Repair

Surgical mitral valve reintervention is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and repeat repair is not always feasible. We examine the clinical outcomes of the NeoChord procedure after failed conventional mitral valve repair. A total of 312 patients were treated with the NeoChord repair procedure between January 2014 and December 2018 at 5 European centers. Clinical and echocardiographic data were reviewed to identify patients who had a prior surgical mitral valve repair procedure. The primary endpoint (Patient Success) was a composite of placement of at least 2 neochordae and end-procedure mitral valve regurgitation (MR) ≤ mild, freedom from death, stroke, structural or functional procedure failure (MR > moderate), procedure or device-related unplanned procedures, cardiac-related rehospitalization, or worsening NYHA functional class at 1 and 2-year FU. Fifteen (15) patients were identified who required reoperation for failed surgical mitral valve repair. Mean time-to-reoperation was 2.7 years (2.2-6.1). Median intensive care unit stay was 24 hours and median hospitalization time was 7 days (6-8). No in-hospital deaths were observed. At discharge, mitral regurgitation was ≤ mild in 13 patients (86.7%). Patient success and freedom from more than mild MR were 92.3 ± 7.4% and 83.9 ± 10.4% at 1 and 2-year follow-up respectively. One high-risk patient presented with severe recurrent MR and died during surgical reintervention due to an acute aortic dissection. Selected patients can be successfully treated with the NeoChord procedure after failed surgical mitral valve repair. These results support a wider adoption of the NeoChord procedure as a first-line minimally invasive, alternative therapy to treat failed mitral valve repair

Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was undertaken to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Specifically, we sought to determine whether the choice of mitral valve procedure affected survival, and discover which patients were predicted to benefit from mitral valve repair and which from replacement.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 218 consecutive patients underwent either mitral valve repair (MVP, n = 112) or mitral valve replacement (MVR, n = 106). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical material, operation methods, echocardiography check during operation and follow-up. Patients details and follow-up outcomes were compared using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No statistical difference was found between the two groups in term of intraoperative data. Early mortality was 3.2% (MVP 2.7% and MVR 3.8%). At discharge, Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were improved more in the MVP group than MVR group (P < 0.05), however, in follow-up no statistically significant difference was observed between the MVR and MVP group (P > 0.05). Follow-up mitral regurgitation grade was significantly improved in the MVR group compared with the MVP group (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were simlar between MVP and MVR group. Logistic regression revealed poor survival was associated with old age(#75), preoperative renal insufficiency and low left ventricular ejection fraction (< 30%).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice in the majority of patients having surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction. Early results of MVP treatment seem to be satisfactory, but several lines of data indicate that mitral valve repair provided less long-term benefit than mitral valve replacement in the LVD patients.</p

Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures

AbstractObjective: This study was carried out to evaluate the long-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation caused by myxomatous disease of the mitral valve and the late effects of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures in this operation. Methods: A total of 324 patients with mitral regurgitation caused by myxomatous disease underwent mitral valve repair from 1981 to 1995; the group comprised 241 men and 83 women whose mean age was 58 ± 14 years. Chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures has been performed in 165 patients since 1985. Most of the patients who had chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures had prolapse of the anterior leaflet or prolapse of both leaflets, whereas most patients who had mitral valve repair without chordal replacement had prolapse of the posterior leaflet. Patients were followed up at annual intervals and had a Doppler echocardiographic study. The follow-up was complete and extended from 6 to 156 months (mean 36 ± 30 months). Results: Two operative and 21 late deaths occurred (14 cardiac and 7 noncardiac). At 10 years the actuarial survival was 75% ± 5%, the freedom from stroke was 94% ± 2%, the freedom from transient ischemic attacks was 92% ± 4%, the freedom from endocarditis was 99% ± 1%, the freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 96% ± 1%, and the freedom from severe mitral regurgitation was 93% ± 3%. Chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures had no effect on any of these end points. Conclusions: Mitral valve repair was feasible in most patients with mitral regurgitation caused by myxomatous disease and it was associated with low rates of valve-related complications. Chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene had no adverse effect on the late outcome and was believed to have increased the probability of mitral valve repair. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1279-86

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery I: Patient Selection, Evaluation, and Planning.

Widespread adoption of minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement may be fostered by practice consensus and standardization. This expert opinion, first of a 3-part series, outlines current best practices in patient evaluation and selection for minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, and discusses preoperative planning for cannulation and myocardial protection

An unusual complication after mitral valve repair

CITATION: Kabwe, L., Weich, H. & Pecoraro, A. 2019. An unusual complication after mitral valve repair. SA Heart Journal, 16(1):50-51. doi:10.24170/16-1-3416.The original publication is available at https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/indexA 22-year-old lady presented to the outpatient department with new onset dyspnoea and effort intolerance. She had a prior history of successful mitral valve repair 5 years previously for symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation, secondary to myxomatous mitral valve prolapse. Clinical examination revealed an undisplaced apex with a parasternal heave (suggestive of right ventricular hypertrophy) and a soft ejection systolic murmur in the pulmonary area. On review of her previous echocardiograms, the pre-surgery apical 4 chamber (Figure 1A) revealed a dilated left ventricle and atrium with normal right heart chambers. Her post-operative echocardiogram (Figure 1B) confirmed successful mitral valve repair with a reduction in left ventricular size and normal right ventricle. A review of her echocardiogram (Figure 1C) at this visit, revealed new right ventricle dilatation with features of diastolic overload. No evidence of tricuspid/pulmonary incompetence was found. Transoesophageal echocardiography (Figure 1D) confirmed a large atrial septal defect (ASD). We concluded that this was an iatrogenic ASD as a complication of mitral valve repair. The ASD was closed percutaneously with an amplatzer device (see online publication for video supplement).https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/article/view/3416Publisher’s versio

Residual mitral regurgitation after repair for posterior leaflet prolapse- Importance of preoperative anterior leaflet tethering

Background Carpentier's techniques for degenerative posterior mitral leaflet prolapse have been established with excellent long‐term results reported. However, residual mitral regurgitation ( MR ) occasionally occurs even after a straightforward repair, though the involved mechanisms are not fully understood. We sought to identify specific preoperative echocardiographic findings associated with residual MR after a posterior mitral leaflet repair. Methods and Results We retrospectively studied 117 consecutive patients who underwent a primary mitral valve repair for isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse including a preoperative 3‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography examination. Twelve had residual MR after the initial repair, of whom 7 required a corrective second pump run, 4 underwent conversion to mitral valve replacement, and 1 developed moderate MR within 1 month. Their preoperative parameters were compared with those of 105 patients who had an uneventful mitral valve repair. There were no hospital deaths. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative anterior mitral leaflet tethering angle as a significant predictor for residual MR (odds ratio, 6.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–33.8; P =0.0049). Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis revealed a cut‐off value of 24.3° (area under the curve, 0.77), indicating that anterior mitral leaflet angle predicts residual MR . In multivariate regression analysis, smaller anteroposterior mitral annular diameter ( P &lt;0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction ( P =0.002) were significantly associated with higher anterior mitral leaflet angle, whereas left ventricular and left atrial dimension had no significant correlation. Conclusions Anterior mitral leaflet tethering in cases of posterior mitral leaflet prolapse has an adverse impact on early results following mitral valve repair. The findings of preoperative 3‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography are important for consideration of a careful surgical strategy. </jats:sec