19 research outputs found
Mim-Width II. The Feedback Vertex Set Problem
Under embargo until: 2020-07-18We give a first polynomial-time algorithm for (WEIGHTED) FEEDBACK VERTEX SET on graphs of bounded maximum induced matching width (mim-width). Explicitly, given a branch decomposition of mim-width w, we give an nO(w)-time algorithm that solves FEEDBACK VERTEX SET. This provides a unified polynomial-time algorithm for many well-known classes, such as INTERVAL graphs, PERMUTATION graphs, and LEAF POWER graphs (given a leaf root), and furthermore, it gives the first polynomial-time algorithms for other classes of bounded mim-width, such as CIRCULAR PERMUTATION and CIRCULAR k-TRAPEZOID graphs (given a circular k-trapezoid model) for fixed k. We complement our result by showing that FEEDBACK VERTEX SET is W[1]-hard when parameterized by w and the hardness holds even when a linear branch decomposition of mim-width w is given.acceptedVersio
Mim-Width III. Graph powers and generalized distance domination problems
We generalize the family of (Ď,Ď) problems and locally checkable vertex partition problems to their distance versions, which naturally captures well-known problems such as Distance-r Dominating Set and Distance-r Independent Set. We show that these distance problems are in XP parameterized by the structural parameter mim-width, and hence polynomial-time solvable on graph classes where mim-width is bounded and quickly computable, such as k-trapezoid graphs, Dilworth k-graphs, (circular) permutation graphs, interval graphs and their complements, convex graphs and their complements, k-polygon graphs, circular arc graphs, complements of d-degenerate graphs, and H-graphs if given an H-representation. We obtain these results by showing that taking any power of a graph never increases its mim-width by more than a factor of two. To supplement these findings, we show that many classes of (Ď,Ď) problems are W[1]-hard parameterized by mimwidth + solution size. We show that powers of graphs of tree-width w â 1 or path-width w and powers of graphs of clique-width w have mim-width at most w. These results provide new classes of bounded mim-width. We prove a slight strengthening of the first statement which implies that, surprisingly, Leaf Power graphs which are of importance in the field of phylogenetic studies have mim-width at most 1.publishedVersio
Classification of OBDD Size for Monotone 2-CNFs
We introduce a new graph parameter called linear upper maximum induced matching width lu-mim width, denoted for a graph G by lu(G). We prove that the smallest size of the obdd for ?, the monotone 2-cnf corresponding to G, is sandwiched between 2^{lu(G)} and n^{O(lu(G))}. The upper bound is based on a combinatorial statement that might be of an independent interest. We show that the bounds in terms of this parameter are best possible.
The new parameter is closely related to two existing parameters: linear maximum induced matching width (lmim width) and linear special induced matching width (lsim width). We prove that lu-mim width lies strictly in between these two parameters, being dominated by lsim width and dominating lmim width. We conclude that neither of the two existing parameters can be used instead of lu-mim width to characterize the size of obdds for monotone 2-cnfs and this justifies introduction of the new parameter
On the Hardness of Generalized Domination Problems Parameterized by Mim-Width
For nonempty ?, ? ? ?, a vertex set S in a graph G is a (?, ?)-dominating set if for all v ? S, |N(v) ? S| ? ?, and for all v ? V(G) ? S, |N(v) ? S| ? ?. The Min/Max (?,?)-Dominating Set problems ask, given a graph G and an integer k, whether G contains a (?, ?)-dominating set of size at most k and at least k, respectively. This framework captures many well-studied graph problems related to independence and domination. Bui-Xuan, Telle, and Vatshelle [TCS 2013] showed that for finite or co-finite ? and ?, the Min/Max (?,?)-Dominating Set problems are solvable in XP time parameterized by the mim-width of a given branch decomposition of the input graph. In this work we consider the parameterized complexity of these problems and obtain the following: For minimization problems, we complete several scattered W[1]-hardness results in the literature to a full dichotomoy into polynomial-time solvable and W[1]-hard cases, and for maximization problems we obtain the same result under the additional restriction that ? and ? are finite sets. All W[1]-hard cases hold assuming that a linear branch decomposition of bounded mim-width is given, and with the solution size being an additional part of the parameter. Furthermore, for all W[1]-hard cases we also rule out f(w)n^o(w/log w)-time algorithms assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, where f is any computable function, n is the number of vertices and w the mim-width of the given linear branch decomposition of the input graph
Blazing a Trail via Matrix Multiplications: A Faster Algorithm for Non-Shortest Induced Paths
For vertices and of an -vertex graph , a -trail of is
an induced -path of that is not a shortest -path of . Berger,
Seymour, and Spirkl [Discrete Mathematics 2021] gave the previously only known
polynomial-time algorithm, running in time, to either output a
-trail of or ensure that admits no -trail. We reduce the
complexity to the time required to perform a poly-logarithmic number of
multiplications of Boolean matrices, leading to a largely
improved -time algorithm.Comment: 18 pages, 6 figures, a preliminary version appeared in STACS 202
Contracting to a Longest Path in H-Free Graphs
The Path Contraction problem has as input a graph G and an integer k and is to decide if G can be modified to the k-vertex path P_k by a sequence of edge contractions. A graph G is H-free for some graph H if G does not contain H as an induced subgraph. The Path Contraction problem restricted to H-free graphs is known to be NP-complete if H = claw or H = P? and polynomial-time solvable if H = P?. We first settle the complexity of Path Contraction on H-free graphs for every H by developing a common technique. We then compare our classification with a (new) classification of the complexity of the problem Long Induced Path, which is to decide for a given integer k, if a given graph can be modified to P_k by a sequence of vertex deletions. Finally, we prove that the complexity classifications of Path Contraction and Cycle Contraction for H-free graphs do not coincide. The latter problem, which has not been fully classified for H-free graphs yet, is to decide if for some given integer k, a given graph contains the k-vertex cycle C_k as a contraction