510 research outputs found

    Meet the New Boss ...

    Get PDF

    Meet the New Boss : The New Judicial Center

    Get PDF
    A document entitled ‘Guidelines on Constitutional Litigation’ published in 1988 by the Reagan era Department of Justice is the springboard for Professor Tushnet\u27s discussion of the Supreme Court\u27s new center. The Guidelines urged Department of Justice litigators to foster a nearly exclusive reliance on original understanding in constitutional interpretation and to resort to legislative history only as a last resort. The Guidelines also advised Department of Justice litigators to seek substantive legal changes including more restrictive standing requirements, an end to the creation of unenumerated individual rights, greater constitutional protection of property rights, and greater limits on congressional power. The discussion begins by viewing the Guidelines\u27 characterization of Supreme Court jurisprudence as an indication of the Court\u27s old center. The discussion then examines the Court\u27s subsequent development to reach an understanding of the Court\u27s new center. Professor Tushnet finds that although the Court at times seemed to entertain some views espoused by the Guidelines, the present Court\u27s center is remarkably like the Court\u27s center in 1988. Original understanding remains only one method of constitutional interpretation -not even the most important one - and legislative history continues to play a role in statutory interpretation. Furthermore, changes in Court\u27s jurisprudence involving standing, unenumerated rights, and congressional power remain limited (though there appear to be greater constitutional protections of property rights). The only notable difference is that the present Court has developed doctrines that could swing constitutional interpretation toward the approach taken by the Guidelines should newly appointed Justices want to endorse that approach. But for now the current Court is much the same as before

    Meet the New Boss: An Honors Faculty Member Weathers Administrative Change

    Get PDF
    The author reflects on the role of honors faculty in effectively responding to short- and long-term administrative change, discussing the value of resistance to deleterious administrative decisions and offering advice for successfully navigating cyclical administrative shifts in honors

    Meet the new boss – and imagine a better future

    Get PDF

    JNCHC: Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council; Forum Essays on Regime Change in Honors, Vol. 24, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2023: Complete Issue

    Get PDF
    Contents Call for Papers v Editorial Policy, Deadlines, and Submission Guidelines vii Dedication to James Joseph Buss ix Editor’s Introduction, Ada Long xi Forum Essays on “Regime Change in Honors” A Defiant Honors Response to Regime Change. John Zubizarreta 3 Meet the New Boss: An Honors Faculty Member Weathers Administrative Change, Annmarie Guzy 13 Leveraging Regime Change as an Opportunity to Reimagine, Reset, and Demonstrate Results in Honors, Irina V. Ellison 19 Regime Change as Opportunity: A Case for a Radically Inclusive Response, Massimo Rondolino 25 Honors Flourishing in the Midst of Change, Hao Hong, Robert Glover, Mimi Killinger, and Jordan LaBouff 33 Research Essays Resisting Disciplinarity: Curriculum Mapping and Transdisciplinarity, Megan Snider Bailey 41 Diversity in Honors: Understanding Systemic Biases through Student Narrative, Aman Singla, Minerva Melendrez, Mable T. Thai, Sukhdev S. Mann, Denise Zhong, Kim T. Hoang, Isabella H. Lee, and Andrea V. Aponte 57 Ready for Business: Developing an Online Business Honors Course for Quality, Engagement, and Inclusivity, Kayla N. Sapkota 81 About the Authors 92 NCHC Publication Descriptions and Order Forms 9

    ‘Meet the new boss 
 same as the old boss?’:technology, toil and tension in the agrofuel frontier

    Get PDF
    Agrofuels are increasingly sourced and sold as a socially and environmentally beneficial solution to oil dependence. The promotion of sugar-derived ethanol as a substitute for petroleum has thus been key to state development and international trade policies by Brazil and the European Union, respectively, and subsequent investment by leading energy and food transnational corporations has transformed socio-spatial relations in the new sites of production. Brazilian rural worker testimonies, however, point to large-scale labour exclusion rather than reform and a deepening, rather than disruption, of historic power inequalities in the sector. Labour contestation challenges a converging institutional discourse of responsible technological innovation and social upgrading associated with emerging commodity chains and the ‘green’ economy. Although corporate and statutory response has been market-orientated certification and ‘more technology’ the idea of the ‘techno-institutional fix’ provides a power relation-attentive analysis that invites the further exploration of socially committed alternatives to food and energy production

    Beijing Replaces Washington’s Dominant Position in Latin America: Meet the New Boss. Same as the Old Boss?

    Get PDF
    Ceteris paribus, 2015 onward should be the years of China’s consolidation of its presence in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly in the commodity-exporting MERCOSUR countries. The South American integration process became obsolete and irrelevant. China has gained dominant position in all Southern Cone economies. Domestic policy mistakes will strain China-Latin American relations over time. Latin nationalism and populism politics will resurface. This time against China. The reality is that, in this new century, China is not the problem but rather the only solution for Latin America
    • 

    corecore