8,034 research outputs found
The meaning of meaning-fallibilism
Much discussion of meaning by philosophers over the last 300 years has been predicated on a Cartesian first-person authority (i.e. âinfallibilismâ) with respect to what oneâs terms mean. However this has problems making sense of the way the meanings of scientific terms develop, an increase in scientific knowledge over and above scientistsâ ability to quantify over new entities. Although a recent conspicuous embrace of rigid designation has broken up traditional meaning-infallibilism to some extent, this new dimension to the meaning of terms such as âwaterâ is yet to receive a principled epistemological undergirding (beyond the deliverances of âintuitionâ with respect to certain somewhat unusual possible worlds).
Charles Peirceâs distinctive, naturalistic philosophy of language is mined to provide a more thoroughly fallibilist, and thus more realist, approach to meaning, with the requisite epistemology. Both his pragmatism and his triadic account of representation, it is argued, produce an original approach to meaning, analysing it in processual rather than objectual terms, and opening a distinction between âmeaning for usâ, the meaning a term has at any given time for any given community and âmeaning simpliciterâ, the way use of a given term develops over time (often due to a posteriori input from the world which is unable to be anticipated in advance). This account provocatively undermines a certain distinction between âsemanticsâ and âontologyâ which is often taken for granted in discussions of realism
A semiotic polyocular framework for multidisciplinary research in relation to multifunctional farming and rural development
The concept of multifunctional farming rises out of a problematization of the role of agriculture in society and, in particular, in relation to rural development. Hitherto multifunctional farming has primarily been used as a notion on the relationship between agriculture and society concerning the range of commodity and non-commodity goods that farms provide for society. But the agro-economic achievements together with societal development have led to a point where praxis is questioned and discourse potentially reopened. In an indirect way, the notion of multifunctionality reflects, that aspects not captured by the distinction between commodity and non-commodity need to be reintroduced.
This paper offers a new framework (theoretical and methodical) suggesting a poly-ocular multidisciplinary approach and constructivist semiotic understanding of multifunctionality, which supports dialogue and interactions between the approaches, involved. Each research perspective has its own construction of the object of âfarmingâ and the âenvironmentâ of farming; and thereby also its own perception of the functions and problems of farming. It therefore comes as no surprise that problems of communication are experienced between different perspectives, or that confusion on shared notions can cause frustrations and difficulties for multidisciplinary studies of multifunctionality. The present framework introduces a notion of multifunctionality, which enables the explicit handling of different perspectives by way of a distinction between the âimmediate objectâ, as it appears to the observer, and the âdynamical objectâ, which represents the potentiality of the object in itself. From such semiotic point of view, the notion of multifunctionality becomes genuinely multidisciplinary. Multifunctionality cannot be reduced and included in one perspective, but has to be observed as a second order observation that involves reflexive communication between different perspectives and disciplines
Research Methods for Non-Representational Approaches of Organizational Complexity. The Dialogical and Mediated Inquiry
This paper explores the methodological implications of non-representational approaches of organizational complexity. Representational theories focus on the syntactic complexity of systems, whereas organizing processes are predominantly characterized by semantic and pragmatic forms of complexity. After underlining the contribution of non-representational approaches to the study of organizations, the paper warns against the risk of confining the critique of representational frameworks to paradoxical dichotomies like intuition versus reflexive thought or theorizing versus experimenting. To sort out this difficulty, it is suggested to use a triadic theory of interpretation, and more particularly the concepts of semiotic mediation, inquiry and dialogism. Semiotic mediation dynamically links situated experience and generic classes of meanings. Inquiry articulates logical thinking, narrative thinking and experimenting. Dialogism conceptualizes the production of meaning through the situated interactions of actors. A methodological approach based on those concepts, âthe dialogical and mediated inquiryâ (DMI), is proposed and experimented in a case study about work safety in the construction industry. This interpretive view requires complicating the inquiring process rather than the mirroring models of reality. In DMI, the inquiring process is complicated by establishing pluralist communities of inquiry in which different perspectives challenge each other. Finally the paper discusses the specific contribution of this approach compared with other qualitative methods and its present limits.Activity; Dialogism; Inquiry; Interpretation; Pragmatism; Research Methods; Semiotic Mediation; Work Safety
Theorising and practitioners in HRD: the role of abductive reasoning
Purpose â The purpose of this paper is to argue that abductive reasoning is a typical but usually unrecognised process used by HRD scholars and practitioners alike. Design/methodology/approach â This is a conceptual paper that explores recent criticism of traditional views of theory-building, based on the privileging of scientific theorising, which has led to a relevance gap between scholars and practitioners. The work of Charles Sanders Peirce and the varieties of an abductive reasoning process are considered. Findings â Abductive reasoning, which precedes induction and deduction, provide a potential connection with HRD practitioners who face difficult problems. Two types of abductive reasoning are explored â existential and analogic. Both offer possibilities for theorising with HRD practitioners. A range of methods for allowing abduction to become more evident with practitioners are presented. The authors consider how abduction can be used in engaged and participative research strategies. Research limitations/implications â While this is a conceptual paper, it does suggest implications for engagement and participation in theorising with HRD practitioners. Practical implications â Abductive reasoning adds to the repertoire of HRD scholars and practitioners. Originality/value â The paper elucidates the value of abductive reasoning and points to how it can become an integral element of theory building in HRD
Ontologies on the semantic web
As an informational technology, the World Wide Web has enjoyed spectacular success. In just ten years it has transformed the way information is produced, stored, and shared in arenas as diverse as shopping, family photo albums, and high-level academic research. The âSemantic Webâ was touted by its developers as equally revolutionary but has not yet achieved anything like the Webâs exponential uptake. This 17 000 word survey article explores why this might be so, from a perspective that bridges both philosophy and IT
Academic practice as explanatory framework: reconceptualising international student academic engagement and university teaching
This paper joins growing interest in the concept of practice, and uses it to reconceptualise international student engagement with the demands of study at an Australian university. Practice foregrounds institutional structures and student agency and brings together psychologically- and socially-oriented perspectives on international student learning approaches. Utilising discourse theory, practice is defined as habitual and individual instances of socially-contextualised configurations of elements such as actions and interactions, roles and relations, identities, objects, values, and language. In the university context, academic practice highlights the institutionally-sanctioned ways of knowing, doing and being that constitute academic tasks. The concept is applied here to six international studentsâ âreadingsâ of and strategic responses to academic work in a Master of Education course. It is argued that academic practice provides a comprehensive framework for explaining the interface between university academic requirements and international student learning, and the crucial role that teaching has in facilitating the experience
Exploring the role of objects in the transformation of logics: a practice perspective
This article aims to examine the role of objects in the transformation of logics (Thornton & Ocasio, 2008) at the practice level. In particular, it explores how financial actors use, transform and are constrained by their 'market devices' - defined as a range of instruments, models and tools used by financial markets (Callon, Millo, & Muniesa, 2007) - when aiming to (re)design their logics and practices towards more sustainability. It develops a theoretical model based on ever expanding, institutional theory by combining it with practice theories. In particular, the article argues that actors transform their practices, logics and objects, by transforming an epistemic object through a collective inquiry. Empirical support is drawn from a three-year ethnography study of a French asset management company that attempted to (re)design its equity investment process, following new demands for Socially Responsible Investment (SRI). Research methods combine participative observation, semi-structured interviews and documentary evidence. Theoretical andmethodological contributions are outlined for both institutional and practice theories.Inquiry ; Logics ; Objects ; Practices ; Pragmatism
History friendly simulations for modelling industrial dynamics
simulation, models, industrial dynamics
WHAT IS INFORMATION SUCH THAT THERE CAN BE INFORMATION SYSTEMS?
Information systems, as a discipline, is concerned with the generation, storage and transmission of
information, generally by technological means. As such, it would seem to be fundamental that it has
a clear and agreed conceptualization of its core subject matter â namely âinformationâ. Yet, we
would claim, this is clearly not the case. As McKinney and Yoos point out, in a recent survey of the
term information within information systems: âThis is the IS predicament â using information as a
ubiquitous label whose meaning is almost never specified. Virtually all the extant IS literature fails to
explicitly specify meaning for the very label that identifies it.â We live in an information age and the
vast majority of information (whatever it may be) is made available through a wide range of
computer systems and one would expect therefore that information systems would in fact be one of
the leading disciplines of the times rather than one that appears to hide itself in the shadows.
Governments nowadays routinely utilize many academic experts to advise them in a whole range of
areas but how many IS professors ever get asked? So, the primary purpose of this paper is to
stimulate a debate within IS to discuss, and try to establish, a secure foundation for the discipline in
terms of its fundamental concept â information. The structure of the paper is that we will firstly
review the theories of information used (generally implicitly) within IS. Then we will widen the
picture to consider the range of theories available more broadly within other disciplines. We will
then suggest a particular approach that we consider most fruitful and discuss some of the major
contentious issues. We will illustrate the theories with examples from IS
- âŠ